Hua Fei1, Linya Wang1, Qian He1, Wenqing Du1, Qingjun Gu1, Yucheng Pan1. 1. The Laboratory of Architectural Environment and Energy Application Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi Province, China.
Abstract
Energy has become the key material basis of social development. In this work, liquid capric acid-paraffin was evenly adsorbed in the pore structure of expanded graphite (EG) by a physical adsorption method, and the new composite phase change material of capric acid-paraffin/expanded graphite (CA-P/EG) was prepared. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) curves of CA-P/EG composites did not change after 1000 cycles, and there was no new characteristic absorption peak, indicating that CA-P/EG composites have good chemical stability. The results showed that the optimum content of CA-P/EG in a phase change energy storage gypsum board was 20%, and the wet bending strength and compressive strength were 2.42 and 6.45 MPa, respectively. The water absorption was 16.37%, and the apparent density was 1.410 g/cm3. In addition, the melting and freezing temperatures were 26.40 and 23.10 °C, and the latent heats of melting and freezing were 27.20 and 25.69 J/g, respectively. It was found that the gypsum board has excellent thermal stability after 400 times of melting-freezing cycling and that the heat storage capacity increases with the increase of the CA-P/EG content and the thickness of the gypsum board.
Energy has become the key material basis of social development. In this work, liquid capric acid-paraffin was evenly adsorbed in the pore structure of expanded graphite (EG) by a physical adsorption method, and the new composite phase change material of capric acid-paraffin/expanded graphite (CA-P/EG) was prepared. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) curves of CA-P/EG composites did not change after 1000 cycles, and there was no new characteristic absorption peak, indicating that CA-P/EG composites have good chemical stability. The results showed that the optimum content of CA-P/EG in a phase change energy storage gypsum board was 20%, and the wet bending strength and compressive strength were 2.42 and 6.45 MPa, respectively. The water absorption was 16.37%, and the apparent density was 1.410 g/cm3. In addition, the melting and freezing temperatures were 26.40 and 23.10 °C, and the latent heats of melting and freezing were 27.20 and 25.69 J/g, respectively. It was found that the gypsum board has excellent thermal stability after 400 times of melting-freezing cycling and that the heat storage capacity increases with the increase of the CA-P/EG content and the thickness of the gypsum board.
With the continuous
improvement of human requirements for indoor comfort, the corresponding
building energy consumption has also been gradually increasing, and
environmental pollution has become more serious.[1] It is undoubtedly an effective and feasible method to apply
phase change material (PCM) to traditional building materials to produce
phase change energy storage building materials with load-bearing,
energy storage, and temperature control characteristics.[2,3] The method makes full use of clean and renewable energy such as
solar energy and exerts its own characteristics of energy storage
and temperature control, which can effectively increase the thermal
inertia of the enclosure structure, reduce the indoor temperature
fluctuation, and improve the indoor environment comfort. Gypsum has
the advantages of thermal insulation, humidity control, fire prevention,
lightweight, easy processing, and low price and has been widely used
in building various types of light internal and external walls.[4] PCM and gypsum are combined to make a phase change
gypsum board, which can not only retain the advantages of gypsum itself
but also have the characteristics of energy storage and temperature
control of phase change materials.[5−7]However, there are few studies on the preparation
of the phase change gypsum board by the combination of PCM and gypsum.[8−15] Ahmet et al.[16] studied the thermal properties of myristic acid,
palmitic acid, lauric acid, stearic acid, palmitate stearic acid,
and other mixtures to characterize their thermal stabilities. Ahmad
et al.[17] investigated the thermal properties
of energy-saving walls made of different phase change materials and
found that the board filled with polyethylene glycol is more suitable
for a local environment. Fatty acid phase change energy storage materials
and expanded graphite-based composite phase change materials have
good temperature control and energy storage characteristics.[18−20] Zhao et al.[21] studied a kind of polyethylene glycol shape-stabilized
phase change material encapsulated by biological porous carbon with
a honeycomb structure by a vacuum impregnation method, which enhanced
thermal conductivity when used for thermal energy storage. Min et
al.[22] also prepared a novel poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG)-shaped composite phase change material with radial mesoporoussilica spheres for heat storage, which has large latent heat, appropriate
phase change temperature, good thermal reliability, good chemical
compatibility, and thermal stability, and was a promising candidate
material for building heat storage applications. Other studies have
also prepared materials with good properties by appropriate methods.[23,24] A new type of green building energy storage material can be obtained
by combining composite phase change materials and building materials.
When applied in the building envelope, the indoor temperature fluctuation
and the building energy consumption can be reduced and human comfort
can be improved.[25,26] Sari et al.[27] prepared capric acid–myristic acid/cement-form stable
phase change material by the vacuum embedding method. The results
showed that the average temperature difference between a phase change
laboratory and an ordinary laboratory before the end of heating was
0.78 °C, indicating that it has good temperature regulation performance.
Wang et al.[28] found that the addition of
diatomite-based and ceramsite-based thermal storage aggregates significantly
improved the temperature fluctuation and thermal comfort of the laboratory
under hot and cold environments, and the indoor temperature fluctuation
decreased by 5.94 and 5.74 °C, respectively. Therefore, fatty
acid phase change energy storage materials and expanded graphite-based
composite phase change materials have good compatibility with cement,
concrete, and gypsum.[29−33] The composite
phase change energy storage building materials can increase the thermal
inertia of lightweight envelopes, improve indoor comfort, and reduce
building energy consumption.In this work, phase change gypsum
boards were prepared by microencapsulation using capric acid-paraffin/expanded
graphite (CA-P/EG) form stable phase change material with a high energy
storage density and a low cost. The properties were characterized
by a mechanical property test, a water absorption test, scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
Results and Discussion
Thermal Stability Analysis
of
CA-P/EG Composite Phase Change Materials
The accelerated
melting–freezing cycling test for 1000 times was carried out
on CA-P/EG composites, and the thermal conductivity of CA-P/EG composites
was 0.455 W/(m·K). The stabilities of thermal and chemical properties
of CA-P/EG composites after cycling were measured. The experimental
results are shown in Figure . It can be seen from Figure that after 1000 cycles, the melting and freezing temperatures
of CA-P/EG are 27.14 and 23.80 °C, respectively, and the latent
heats of melting and freezing are 130.6 and 126.4 J/g, respectively.
By comparing the phase transformation properties of CA-P/EG before
and after the melting–freezing cycles, it can be found that
the freezing and melting temperatures of CA-P/EG increased by 6.9
and 0.3%, respectively, and the latent heats of freezing and melting
decreased by 5.4 and 9.5%, respectively, which may be due to the degradation
of the chemical structure and the measurement error of DSC. The latent
heat and the temperature of phase transition change slightly, which
indicates that CA-P/EG has good thermal stability.
Figure 1
DSC curves of CA-P and CA-P/EG before
and after thermal cycling.
DSC curves of CA-P and CA-P/EG before
and after thermal cycling.It can be
seen from Figure that
after 1000 melting–freezing cycles, the Fourier transform infrared
(FT-IR) curve of the CA-P/EG composite does not change, nor does it
produce new characteristic absorption peaks; therefore, its chemical
stability is good. According to the test results before and after
CA-P/EG melting–freezing cycles, CA-P/EG has good chemical
and thermal stabilities after 1000 cycles and has application prospects
in building energy-saving, low-temperature solar thermal storage,
and other fields.
Figure 2
FT-IR of CA-P/EG before
and after thermal cycling.
FT-IR of CA-P/EG before
and after thermal cycling.
Mechanical Properties of
the Phase Change Energy Storage Gypsum Board
According to
the standard test for mechanical properties of gypsum,
the mechanical properties of the phase change gypsum board with different
contents are shown in Tables and 2 and Figure . It can be seen that the mechanical properties
of the phase change gypsum board decrease gradually with the increase
of the CA-P/EG content. When the content of CA-P/EG is 10%, the decreasing
speed is faster. The flexural strength decreases from 4.20 to 2.63
MPa, which
is a decrease by 37.4%. The compressive strength decreases from 11.6
to 7.5 MPa, which is a decrease by 35.3%. When the content of CA-P/EG
increased further, the decreasing speed was reduced because the strength
of CA-P/EG is lower than that of gypsum, and CA-P/EG fills the pores
of gypsum, prevents the hydration of gypsum, and reduces the mechanical
properties of gypsum. However, the flexural strength and compressive
strength of the phase change gypsum board with different contents
are more than 2 and 4 MPa, which meet the application requirements
of the construction industry.
Table 1
Flexural Strength
Test Data of the Phase Change Gypsum Board
flexural strength (MPa)
CA-P/EG (wt %)
1
2
3
average value
maximum relative deviation
modified flexural strength (MPa)
0
4.10
4.45
4.05
4.20
5.9% < 10%
4.20
5
3.45
3.25
3.20
3.30
4.5% < 10%
3.30
10
2.55
2.65
2.70
2.63
3.0% < 10%
2.63
15
2.70
2.55
2.45
2.57
5.1% < 10%
2.57
20
2.50
2.35
2.40
2.42
3.3% < 10%
2.42
Table 2
Compressive Strength
Test Data of
the Phase Change Gypsum Board
compressive strength (MPa)
CA-P/EG (wt %)
1
2
3
4
5
6
average value
maximum relative deviation
corrected compressive strength (MPa)
0
11
10.7
10.5
12.3
12.7
12.3
11.6
9.5% < 10%
11.6
5
8.9
9.2
8.4
8.7
7.3
8.7
8.5
14% > 10%, 8.5% < 10%
8.8
10
7.4
7.7
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.2
7.5
4% < 10%
7.5
15
6.7
6.7
6.9
6.8
7.0
6.7
6.8
3% < 10%
6.8
20
6.5
6.6
6.2
6.6
6.5
6.3
6.45
4% < 10%
6.45
Figure 3
Mechanical property curves
of the standard phase change gypsum board.
Mechanical property curves
of the standard phase change gypsum board.
Water
Absorption Performance of the Phase Change Energy Storage
Gypsum Board
The water absorption properties of the phase
change gypsum board with different contents are shown in Table and Figure . It can be seen from Figure that with the increase
of the CA-P/EG content, the water absorption property of the phase
change gypsum board first increases briefly and then decreases continuously.
When the content of CA-P/EG is 5%, the water absorption performance
is the best, which is due to the dry density of the phase change gypsum
board and the increase of overall porosity. However, good water absorption
performance significantly reduces the strength and structure of gypsum.
At the same time, the water absorption rate decreases from 18.07 to
16.37% when the content of CA-P/EG is 20%, which is a decrease by
9.4%. The water absorption performance is the worst. The reason for
this may be that with the increase of the CA-P/EG content, the pores
of gypsum are gradually filled by CA-P/EG to prevent water immersion.
Table 3
Water Absorption
of the Phase Change Gypsum Board
water absorption (%)
CA-P/EG (wt %)
1
2
3
average value
maximum
relative deviation
modified water absorption
(%)
0
18.1
17.7
18.4
18.07
2.0% < 10%
18.07
5
19.0
18.4
18.7
18.70
1.6% < 10%
18.70
10
18.6
16.6
18.7
17.97
7.6% < 10%
17.97
15
17.5
17.5
17.4
17.47
0.4% < 10%
17.47
20
16.5
16.4
16.2
16.37
1.0% < 10%
16.37
Figure 4
Water absorption
curve of the phase change gypsum board.
Water absorption
curve of the phase change gypsum board.
Apparent Density Analysis
of the Phase Change Energy Storage Gypsum Board
Table shows the apparent
density of the phase change energy storage gypsum board with different
contents. It can be seen from Table that the apparent density of the phase change gypsum
board decreases with the increase of the CA-P/EG content; when the
content of CA-P/EG is 5, 10, 15, and 20%, the porosity of the phase
change energy storage gypsum board decreases by 5.8, 8.4, 17.2, and
21.8%, respectively. This indicates that CA-P/EG is evenly filled
in the pores of the gypsum board, its influence on the total volume
of the gypsum board is small, the dry density of CA-P/EG is lower
than that of gypsum, and that the quality of the phase change energy
storage gypsum board per unit volume decreases.
Table 4
Apparent Density
of the Phase Change
Gypsum Board
apparent density (g/cm)
CA-P/EG (wt %)
1
2
3
average value
maximum
relative deviation
modified apparent
density (g/cm3)
0
1.812
1.802
1.794
1.803
0.5% < 10%
1.803
5
1.715
1.701
1.682
1.699
1.0% < 10%
1.699
10
1.655
1.629
1.668
1.651
1.3% < 10%
1.651
15
1.418
1.576
1.486
1.493
5.6% < 10%
1.493
20
1.426
1.380
1.423
1.410
2.1% < 10%
1.410
Microstructural Analysis of the
Phase Change Energy Storage Gypsum Board
Figure shows the SEM images of the
CA-P/EG composite phase change material, the common gypsum board,
and the phase change gypsum board with a CA-P/EG content of 20%. It
can be observed from Figure a that the surface of CA-P/EG becomes relatively smooth and
dense. It can be seen from Figure b that gypsum boards are interlaced in lamellar and
flaky forms with a large number of pores in the interior. As can be
seen from Figure c,
the pores of the phase change gypsum board are uniformly filled with
it due to the addition of the CA-P/EG composite phase change material,
and the appearance becomes dense and compact, which confirms the above
conclusion that the water absorption performance of the phase change
gypsum board gradually becomes poor, and the apparent density gradually
decreases.
Figure 5
SEM images
of an ordinary
gypsum board and the phase change gypsum board ((a), CA-P/EG; (b),
common gypsum board; and (c), phase change energy storage gypsum board).
Figure 7
Mass loss of the CA-P/EG
phase change gypsum board before and after
thermal cycling.
SEM images
of an ordinary
gypsum board and the phase change gypsum board ((a), CA-P/EG; (b),
common gypsum board; and (c), phase change energy storage gypsum board).
Thermal
Performance of the Phase Change Energy Storage Gypsum Board
Figure shows the
DSC curve of the phase change gypsum board with the CA-P/EG content
of 20%. It can be seen from Figure that the melting temperature (Tm) and the melting latent heat (Hm) of the phase change gypsum board are 26.40 °C and 27.20 J/g,
respectively, and the freezing temperature (Tf) and the freezing latent heat (Hf) are 23.10 °C and 25.69 J/g, respectively. Compared with the
thermal properties of CA-P/EG, it can be found that the melting temperature
of CA-P/EG decreases by 2.4%, while the freezing temperature increases
by 3.8%. However, it is still in the required temperature range in
the field of building energy-saving, which may be due to the force
generated by gypsum pores, which needs to be overcome by CA-P/EG in
the processes of melting and freezing. In addition, the latent heats
of melting and freezing of the phase change energy storage gypsum
board are far less than those of CA-P/EG, but it can still meet the
requirements of building energy conservation. This is due to the fact
that the latent heat of the phase change energy storage gypsum board
is proportional to the content of CA-P/EG.
Figure 6
DSC diagram of the phase
change gypsum board.
DSC diagram of the phase
change gypsum board.
Thermal
Stability Analysis of the Phase Change
Energy Storage Gypsum Board (BCESGB)
Thermal stability is
not only an important index to evaluate the service life of phase
change energy storage building materials but also an important factor
affecting their performance. Figure shows the mass loss rate curve
of the phase change gypsum board with different contents of CA-P/EG.
It can be seen from Figure that the mass loss of the phase change gypsum board first
increases and then gradually tends to be constant. Moreover, the higher
the content of CA-P/EG, the greater the leakage rate. When the content
of CA-P/EG is 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20%, the mass loss rate is 0.19, 0.53,
0.57, 0.72, and 0.86%, respectively, which are all less than 1%. This
is because gypsum has a pore structure that can inhibit the seepage
of phase change materials. The leakage of the gypsum sample is not
obvious, indicating that the thermal cycle stability of the phase
change gypsum board is good. The DSC curve of the phase change gypsum
board with a CA-P/EG content of 20% after thermal cycling is shown
in Figure . It can
be seen from Figure that after 400 melting–freezing cycles, the freezing and
melting temperatures of the composite are reduced by 0.53 and 0.10
°C, respectively, and the latent heats of freezing and melting
are reduced by about 4.0 and 4.6%, respectively; the changes of the
latent heat and the temperature are very small, which indicates that
the prepared phase change gypsum board has good thermal stability.
Figure 8
DSC diagram
of the phase change gypsum board before and after thermal cycling.
Mass loss of the CA-P/EG
phase change gypsum board before and after
thermal cycling.DSC diagram
of the phase change gypsum board before and after thermal cycling.
Heat Storage Performance
of the Phase Change Energy Storage Gypsum Board
Heat storage
performance is important to evaluate the use effect of phase change
energy storage building materials.[34−36]Figure shows the temperature curve of the phase change gypsum board with
different contents of CA-P/EG. It can be seen from Figure that the internal and external
surface temperatures of the gypsum board keep increasing until they
tend to become constant under the irradiation of an 800 W far-infrared
heater. At the beginning of heating, the temperature curves of the
phase change gypsum board and the pure gypsum board are basically
consistent due to the good heat effect; the latent heat causes the
phase change of the gypsum board, and a lot of heat is absorbed and
stored in the middle period of the temperature increase, which reduces
the heat conduction per unit time and the temperature fluctuation
amplitude and produces an obvious inflection point in the temperature-change
curve. In the late heating period, the inner and outer surface temperatures
of the gypsum boards changed rapidly until they were consistent with
the ambient temperature. At the same time, the thermal hysteresis
phenomenon occurred, which was obvious with the increase of the CA-P/EG
content. When the inner surface temperature of the pure gypsum board
and the phase change gypsum board reaches 32 °C, the time required
for the phase change energy storage gypsum board with the CA-P/EG
contents of 5, 10, 15, and 20% is 170, 260, 430, and 540 s longer
than that for the pure gypsum board, respectively. This indicates
that the higher the content of CA-P/EG, the slower the rate of temperature
rise and the stronger the heat storage capacity. After the far-infrared
heater is turned off, the temperature of the inner and the outer surface
of the gypsum board decreases gradually until it is close to the ambient
temperature. When the inner surface temperature of the pure gypsum
board drops to 20 °C, the time required is 2520 s. The time consumed
by the phase change energy storage gypsum board with the CA-P/EG contents
of 5, 10, 15, and 20% is 660, 910, 1265, and 1375 s longer than that
by the pure gypsum board, respectively, as a result of the latent
heat effect of phase change, indicating that the higher the content
of CA-P/EG, the more obvious the thermal hysteresis, the lower the
rate of temperature reduction, and the stronger the capacity of heat
storage and temperature regulation.
Figure 9
Temperature-change curves
of the CA-P/EG phase change gypsum board with different contents.
((a) Pure gypsum board, (b) the 5% phase change gypsum board, (c)
the 10% phase change gypsum board, (d) the 15% phase change gypsum
board, and (e) the 20% phase change gypsum board).
Temperature-change curves
of the CA-P/EG phase change gypsum board with different contents.
((a) Pure gypsum board, (b) the 5% phase change gypsum board, (c)
the 10% phase change gypsum board, (d) the 15% phase change gypsum
board, and (e) the 20% phase change gypsum board).The temperature difference
curves of the external and internal surfaces of the CA-P/EG phase
change energy storage gypsum board with different contents are shown
in Figure . The
temperature difference curves of the five kinds of gypsum boards are
basically consistent, and with the increase of the CA-P/EG content,
the maximum temperature difference between the outer and inner surfaces
of the gypsum board increases gradually. The maximum temperature difference
of the pure gypsum board is 4.1 °C at the heating stage, and
the maximum temperature difference of the phase change energy storage
gypsum board with the CA-P/EG contents of 5, 10, 15, and 20% is 4.8,
6, 6.4, and 7.4 °C, respectively. Compared with the pure gypsum
board, the phase change energy storage gypsum board increased by 17,
46, 56, and 80%, respectively. But the maximum temperature difference
of the phase change energy storage gypsum board with the CA-P/EG contents
of 5, 10, 15, and 20% increases by 0.6, 1.1, 1.7, and 2.2 °C,
respectively, at the cooling stage. This may be because the different
temperatures of the heat sources on the inner and outer surfaces lead
to inconsistency in the heating and cooling rates.
Figure 10
Temperature difference
curves between the outer surface and the inner surface of the CA-P/EG
phase change gypsum board with different contents.
Temperature difference
curves between the outer surface and the inner surface of the CA-P/EG
phase change gypsum board with different contents.The temperature
damping rate γ is used to evaluate the heat storage capacity
and energy-saving effect of the phase change gypsum board, which is
to set the time required for the internal surface temperature of the
pure gypsum board to increase from t0 to TP as τ1, and the time required
for the phase change gypsum board to be set as τ2, and the ratio between the difference and τ1 is
set as the temperature damping rate γ, and the calculation formula
is as followsFigure shows the temperature
damping rate curves
of the CA-P/EG phase change gypsum board with different contents from
the initial temperature to 32 °C. As can be seen from Figure , the temperature
damping rate gradually increases with the increase of the CA-P/EG
content. The temperature damping rate of the phase change gypsum board
with the CA-P/EG contents of 5, 10, 15, and 20% increases by 0.12,
0.19, 0.31, and 0.39, respectively. This shows that the CA-P/EG composite
can effectively improve the temperature-change rate of the gypsum
board and the heat storage and temperature regulation ability of the
phase change gypsum board.
Figure 11
Temperature damping
rate change curve of the CA-P/EG phase change gypsum board with different
contents.
Temperature damping
rate change curve of the CA-P/EG phase change gypsum board with different
contents.The temperature damping rates of
the pure gypsum board and the phase change energy storage gypsum board
with the CA-P/EG content of 20% are calculated under different conditions.
As can be seen from Table , when the power is 400, 800, and 1200 W, the temperature
damping ratio of the phase change gypsum board and the CA-P/EG content
of 20% is 0.25, 0.39, and 0.52 higher than that of the pure gypsum
board, respectively. At the same time, it can be seen that with the
increase of the far-infrared heater power, the temperature damping
rate increases, and the energy storage and heat insulation capacities
are also gradually enhanced. Table shows the temperature damping rates of three different
thickness phase change energy storage gypsum boards heated by an 800
W far-infrared heater. It can be seen from Table that the temperature
damping rate of the phase change gypsum board with thicknesses of
1, 2, and 4 cm increases by 0.3, 0.48, and 0.54, respectively, compared
to the pure gypsum board. The temperature damping rate of the phase
change gypsum board with 20% CA-P/EG content increases with the increase
of thickness, and its heat storage capacity also increases.
Table 5
Temperature Damping Rate under Different
Powers
400 W
800 W
1200 W
τ(s)
γ
τ(s)
γ
τ(s)
γ
pure gypsum board
1805
0
1400
0
900
0
phase change gypsum board
2250
0.25
1940
0.39
1370
0.52
Table 6
Temperature Damping Rate of Three Different
Thickness
Phase Change Gypsum Boards
1 cm
2 cm
4 cm
τ(s)
γ
τ(s)
γ
τ(s)
γ
pure gypsum board
1400
0
2395
0
4450
0
phase change gypsum board
1940
0.3
3540
0.48
6850
0.54
Conclusions
The
mechanical properties of the phase change gypsum board decrease with
the increase of the CA-P/EG content, but the flexural strength and
the compressive strength of the phase change gypsum board exceed 2
and 4 MPa, respectively, which can meet the requirements of the construction
industry. Moreover, the water absorption capacity first increased
for a short time and then decreased, and the apparent density decreased
continuously. After 400 cycles, the mass loss rate of the gypsum samples
with different CA-P/EG contents is less than 1%, indicating that gypsum
has good thermal stability. The optimum content of CA-P/EG is 20%,
the melting and freezing temperatures are 26.40 and 23.10 °C,
respectively, and the latent heats of melting and freezing are 27.20
and 25.69 J/g, respectively. The change of the latent heat and the
temperature is very small after 400 cycles, indicating that the thermal
stability is good. On the other hand, the increase or the decrease
rate of the temperature of the phase change gypsum board decreases
with the increase of the CA-P/EG content, the maximum temperature
difference between the inner and outer surfaces increases, and the
heat storage capacity increases with the increase of the CA-P/EG content
and the thickness of the phase change gypsum board.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Capric
acid
(CA, C10H20O2, 172.27, 98.5%, Chemical
Pure), hexadecanol (H, C16H34O, 242.44, 99.0%,
Analytical Reagent), and paraffin section (PS, melting point range
of 50–52 °C) were supplied by Changzhou Haituo Experimental
Instrument Co., Ltd. Expandable graphite (mesh 50, expansion ration:
380 mL/g, carbon content: 98%) was purchased from Qingdao Risheng
graphite Co., Ltd. The expandable graphite (mesh 50, expansion ration:
380 mL/g, carbon content: 98%) used in this experiment was purchased
from Qingdao Risheng graphite Co., Ltd. The α-type superfine
high-strength gypsum powder (mesh 180, the initial/final setting time:
5/28 min, flexural strength: 6.0 MPa, standard consistency: 36%, expansion
coefficient: 0.03, bulk density: 1.43 g/cm3), naphthalene
superplasticizer (brown-yellow powder, water reduction rate: 12–20%),
and poly(vinyl alcohol) 2488 (PVA, mesh 100) were used as experimental
materials. A temperature inspection instrument (THJ082K, accuracy
±0.5% FS), a constant temperature and humidity incubator (HWS-80B,
accuracy ±0.5%, temperature range 0–100 °C, humidity
range 40–90% RH), a PT100 temperature sensor (accuracy ±0.1
°C), a far-infrared heater (NSB-120), a cement flexural testing
machine (DKZ-5000), a pressure testing machine (DYE-2000S), a differential
scanning calorimeter (DSC, TAQ200, TA company), and scanning electron
microscopy (SEM, Zeiss evo18, Germany) were used in this experiment.
Preparation of the
Phase Change Energy Storage Gypsum Board
A certain mass of
EG was weighed in a beaker, and then the liquid CA-P weighed according
to the mass ratio of 7:1 was added to the EG. The thermal conductivity
of the CA-P/EG phase change material is 0.455 W/(m·K) and the
diffusion coefficient is 1.0 × 10–4 m2/s. After being evenly stirred with a glass rod, the beaker sealed
with a film was placed in a drying oven at 65 °C for 24 h and
stirred every 8 h to ensure that CA-P was evenly absorbed into the
pores of the EG. Then, on being cooled to room temperature, the CA-P/EG
composite was obtained. Next, 0.6% naphthalene superplasticizer; 0.47%
water binder ratio; 0.6% PVA dispersant; and 0.5, 10, 15, 20, and
25% mass fractions of the CA-P/EG composite were selected in this
work. The weighed superplasticizer and dispersant were fully dispersed
in ultrapure water, and then the gypsum powder and the CA-P/EG composite
were evenly added into the ultrapure water solution within 30 s. After
standing for 40 s, the mixture was fully stirred using a mixing rod
until the slurry began to thicken. Then, the slurry was slowly injected
into the trial mold coated with the release agent, vibrated, and compacted.
When the initial setting was completed, the surface was scraped with
a scraper, and the gypsum was heated and hardened until demolding
after the final setting. After being demolded, the samples were cured
to the specified time in the laboratory (20 ± 2 °C, 65 ±
5% RH) to prepare the standard phase change energy storage gypsum
board, and the compressive strength, flexural strength, and other
properties of the gypsum board were tested. The fluidity of the slurry
decreased gradually with the increase of the CA-P/EG content. According
to the above method, the phase change energy storage gypsum board
was prepared by changing the specific mass ratio and mold specification,
and the relevant performance test was carried out.
Performance of the Phase Change
Energy Storage Gypsum Board
According to the physical and
mechanical properties’ test method, the 2 h wet flexural strength
and compressive strength of the standard phase change energy storage
gypsum board and the ordinary gypsum board were measured using a cement
bending tester and a pressure testing machine. The phase change energy
storage gypsum board and the ordinary gypsum board after the mechanical
property test were made into three samples with the size of 4 ×
4 × 1 cm3, and their mass was measured. The apparent
densities ρ of the three samples were
calculated using the m/v, and the
arithmetic mean value was taken as the apparent density of the sample.
Then, the above three samples of the same size were dried in a drying
oven at 40 °C to a constant weight M1 and then placed in a closed container containing ultrapure water
to fully soak the samples. After 24 h, the samples were taken out
and wiped with a saturated wet towel, and the mass M2 was quickly weighed. The water absorption S of the three samples was calculated according to (M2 – M1)/M1, and the arithmetic average value was taken as the water
absorption rate of the gypsum sample.The microstructure of
the phase change gypsum board and the ordinary gypsum board was observed
using a scanning electron microscope. The thermal performance and
thermal cycle stability of the phase change gypsum board were analyzed
using differential scanning calorimetry under a nitrogen atmosphere.
The temperature range was 10–80 °C, and the heating/cooling
rate was set at 5 °C/min. The samples of the same size were dried
to a constant weight in a drying oven at 40 °C and placed in
a constant temperature and humidity incubator at 5 °C for 20
min. Then, they were placed in the drying oven at 65 °C for 20
min. In addition, differential scanning calorimetry was used to test
the thermal
properties of the phase change gypsum board, and the thermal stability
of the phase change gypsum board was characterized by microscopic
analysis.The heat storage performance test device of the phase
change energy storage gypsum board is shown in Figure . To test the heat storage performance of
the phase change gypsum board, in a winter indoor environment (the
indoor temperature was about 15 °C), the far-infrared heater
was used to simulate solar radiation, which was placed 25 cm in front
of the sample, and the wall-mounted thermal resistance was evenly
arranged at the center of the inner and outer surfaces of the sample.
After the whole test device was installed, the far-infrared heater
was turned on, and the heating curve of the sample was recorded. When
the heater was turned on for 1.5 h, the power was turned off to cool
the sample in the natural environment, and the cooling curve of the
sample was recorded.
Figure 12
Schematic
diagram of the phase change energy storage gypsum board experimental
device (①, the gypsum sample; ②, a fixed table; ③,
the far-infrared heater; ④, a temperature inspection instrument;
⑤, thermal resistance; and ⑥, a computer).
Schematic
diagram of the phase change energy storage gypsum board experimental
device (①, the gypsum sample; ②, a fixed table; ③,
the far-infrared heater; ④, a temperature inspection instrument;
⑤, thermal resistance; and ⑥, a computer).