Literature DB >> 33718655

Protocol for studying the efficiency of ChemoCalc software in helping patients to understand drug treatment costs for breast cancer: A multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study.

Sayaka Kuba1, Hiroki Moriuchi2, Kosho Yamanouchi3, Kenichiro Shibata4, Hiroshi Yano5, Masahiro Oikawa6, Shigeto Maeda3, Xiangyue Meng1, Michi Morita1, Toshiko Hatachi4, Ryota Otsubo5, Megumi Matsumoto5, Junya Miyamoto7, Kengo Kanetaka1, Hideki Taniguchi4, Takeshi Nagayasu5, Susumu Eguchi1.   

Abstract

Survival of patients with breast cancer can be prolonged by treatment with drugs, particularly new molecular-targeted drugs. However, these agents can be expensive and such treatments can be "an economic burden." In this ongoing trial, we aim to assess the usefulness of ChemoCalc, a software package for calculating drug costs, to help patients understand the financial outlays. In this multicenter, randomized controlled phase 2 trial, 106 patients with advanced breast cancer will be assigned to either the "ChemoCalc" or "Usual Explanation" group. Treatment using ChemoCalc will be discussed with patients in the ChemoCalc group, whereas standard treatments, without using ChemoCalc, will be discussed with patients in the Usual Explanation group. Subsequently, the participants will decide the treatment and complete a five-grade evaluation questionnaire; those in the Usual Explanation group will receive information about ChemoCalc. Investigators will report if patients subsequently decide to change treatments. The primary endpoint will be the scores of two key questions compared between the groups: "Did you understand the cost of treatment in today's discussion?" and "Do you think the cost of treatment is important in choosing a treatment?". The secondary endpoints will be to compare discrepancies between treatments recommended by physicians and those selected by patients, the time required for discussion, other questionnaire factors, and the relationship between Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity tool and treatment selection. This will be the first randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of software to help patients understand drug cost estimates and whether it subsequently affects treatment choice. This study will be conducted according to the CONSORT statement. All participants will sign a written consent form. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University (19070801). The protocol (version 1) was designed and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects (2017). The findings will be disseminated through scientific and professional conferences, and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000039904. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041968.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Clinical trials communication; Oncology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33718655      PMCID: PMC7921475          DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun        ISSN: 2451-8654


  15 in total

Review 1.  Adherence to medication.

Authors:  Lars Osterberg; Terrence Blaschke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2).

Authors:  F Cardoso; A Costa; L Norton; E Senkus; M Aapro; F André; C H Barrios; J Bergh; L Biganzoli; K L Blackwell; M J Cardoso; T Cufer; N El Saghir; L Fallowfield; D Fenech; P Francis; K Gelmon; S H Giordano; J Gligorov; A Goldhirsch; N Harbeck; N Houssami; C Hudis; B Kaufman; I Krop; S Kyriakides; U N Lin; M Mayer; S D Merjaver; E B Nordström; O Pagani; A Partridge; F Penault-Llorca; M J Piccart; H Rugo; G Sledge; C Thomssen; L Van't Veer; D Vorobiof; C Vrieling; N West; B Xu; E Winer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 3.  A review of cost communication in oncology: Patient attitude, provider acceptance, and outcome assessment.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Chun-Ru Chien
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Price Transparency for Whom? In Search of Out-of-Pocket Cost Estimates to Facilitate Cost Communication in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Shelley Fuld Nasso; S Yousuf Zafar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The utility of cost discussions between patients with cancer and oncologists.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Fumiko Chino; Peter A Ubel; Christel Rushing; Gregory Samsa; Ivy Altomare; Jonathan Nicolla; Deborah Schrag; James A Tulsky; Amy P Abernethy; Jeffery M Peppercorn
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Deborah Schrag; Donald H Taylor; Amy M Goetzinger; Xiaoyin Zhong; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-02-26

7.  Cost health literacy as a physician skill-set: the relationship between oncologist reported knowledge and engagement with patients on financial toxicity.

Authors:  Katrina A Fischer; Anne Walling; Neil Wenger; John Glaspy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Therese M Mulvey; Robert M Langdon; Diane Blum; Peter A Ubel; Lowell E Schnipper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prospective Survey of Financial Toxicity Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity in Japanese Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Kazunori Honda; Bishal Gyawali; Masashi Ando; Ryosuke Kumanishi; Kyoko Kato; Keiji Sugiyama; Seiichiro Mitani; Toshiki Masuishi; Yukiya Narita; Hideaki Bando; Hiroya Taniguchi; Shigenori Kadowaki; Takashi Ura; Kei Muro
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-05

10.  Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial.

Authors:  N Harbeck; S Iyer; N Turner; M Cristofanilli; J Ro; F André; S Loi; S Verma; H Iwata; H Bhattacharyya; K Puyana Theall; C H Bartlett; S Loibl
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.