Literature DB >> 33718627

Prolonged Physical Inactivity in Older Adult Couples: A Dyadic Analysis Using Actigraphy.

Chao-Yi Wu1,2, Lyndsey M Miller2,3, Rachel N Wall2,4, Zachary T Beattie1,2, Lisa C Silbert2,4, Jeffrey A Kaye1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many older adults remain inactive despite the known positive health implications of physical activity (improved mood, reduced mortality risk). Physical inactivity is an interdependent phenomenon in couples, but most research examines physical inactivity at the individual level. We estimated the average amount of prolonged physical inactivity for older adult couples and, using dyadic analysis, identified physical and mental health determinants thereof. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-six heterosexual older adult couples (age = 70.61 ± 6.56) from the Veterans Integrated Service Network 20 cohort of the Collaborative Aging Research using Technology (CART) initiative were included. The average number per day of prolonged inactive periods (no step counts or sleep activity for ≥30 min) was estimated using actigraphy data collected over a month.
RESULTS: Multilevel modeling revealed that, within couples, there was no significant difference between partners in the average amount of inactive periods (p = .28). On average across couples, males and females had an average of 6.90 ± 2.02 and 6.56 ± 1.93 inactive periods per day, respectively. For males, older age was the only variable associated with more inactive periods (β = 0.15, p = .002). For females, having more depressive symptoms in both dyad members was associated with fewer inactive periods (female: β = -0.30, p = .03; male: β = -0.41, p < .001), and more dependence in completing their own instrumental activities of daily living predicted more inactive periods (β = 2.58, p < .001). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Viewing couples' activity as an interdependent phenomenon, rather than individual, provides a novel approach to identifying pathways to reduce inactivity in older adults, especially when focusing on the mental health and level of independence within the couple.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise/Physical activity; Independence; Technology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33718627      PMCID: PMC7937911          DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaa066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Aging        ISSN: 2399-5300


  38 in total

1.  Sedentary versus inactive: distinctions for disease prevention.

Authors:  Brigid M Lynch; Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Neville Owen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span.

Authors:  Cynthia A Berg; Renn Upchurch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale.

Authors:  M D Miller; C F Paradis; P R Houck; S Mazumdar; J A Stack; A H Rifai; B Mulsant; C F Reynolds
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 4.  A step-defined sedentary lifestyle index: <5000 steps/day.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; John P Thyfault; John C Spence
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.665

5.  Moving in Sync: Hourly Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior are Synchronized in Couples.

Authors:  Theresa Pauly; Jan Keller; Nina Knoll; Victoria I Michalowski; Diana Hilda Hohl; Maureen C Ashe; Denis Gerstorf; Kenneth M Madden; Christiane A Hoppmann
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-01-01

6.  Gender differences in caregiving among family - caregivers of people with mental illnesses.

Authors:  Nidhi Sharma; Subho Chakrabarti; Sandeep Grover
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-22

Review 7.  How Sedentary are Older People? A Systematic Review of the Amount of Sedentary Behavior.

Authors:  Juliet A Harvey; Sebastien F M Chastin; Dawn A Skelton
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment.

Authors:  Jan Keller; Lena Fleig; Diana Hilda Hohl; Amelie U Wiedemann; Silke Burkert; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Nina Knoll
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Physical activity and sedentary behavior in people with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Felipe Schuch; Davy Vancampfort; Joseph Firth; Simon Rosenbaum; Philip Ward; Thaís Reichert; Natália Carvalho Bagatini; Roberta Bgeginski; Brendon Stubbs
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Gender and the relationship between job experiences and psychological distress: a study of dual-earner couples.

Authors:  R C Barnett; N L Marshall; S W Raudenbush; R T Brennan
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.