Literature DB >> 33718440

State-Space Characterization of Balance Capabilities in Biped Systems with Segmented Feet.

Carlotta Mummolo1, Kubra Akbas1, Giuseppe Carbone2.   

Abstract

The human ability of keeping balance during various locomotion tasks is attributed to our capability of withstanding complex interactions with the environment and coordinating whole-body movements. Despite this, several stability analysis methods are limited by the use of overly simplified biped and foot structures and corresponding contact models. As a result, existing stability criteria tend to be overly restrictive and do not represent the full balance capabilities of complex biped systems. The proposed methodology allows for the characterization of the balance capabilities of general biped models (ranging from reduced-order to whole-body) with segmented feet. Limits of dynamic balance are evaluated by the Boundary of Balance (BoB) and the associated novel balance indicators, both formulated in the Center of Mass (COM) state space. Intermittent heel, flat, and toe contacts are enabled by a contact model that maps discrete contact modes into corresponding center of pressure constraints. For demonstration purposes, the BoB and balance indicators are evaluated for a whole-body biped model with segmented feet representative of the human-like standing posture in the sagittal plane. The BoB is numerically constructed as the set of maximum allowable COM perturbations that the biped can sustain along a prescribed direction. For each point of the BoB, a constrained trajectory optimization algorithm generates the biped's whole-body trajectory as it recovers from extreme COM velocity perturbations in the anterior-posterior direction. Balance capabilities for the cases of flat and segmented feet are compared, demonstrating the functional role the foot model plays in the limits of postural balance. The state-space evaluation of the BoB and balance indicators allows for a direct comparison between the proposed balance benchmark and existing stability criteria based on reduced-order models [e.g., Linear Inverted Pendulum (LIP)] and their associated stability metrics [e.g., Margin of Stability (MOS)]. The proposed characterization of balance capabilities provides an important benchmarking framework for the stability of general biped/foot systems.
Copyright © 2021 Mummolo, Akbas and Carbone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  boundary of balance; center of mass; extended MOS; foot rocking; linear inverted pendulum; margin of stability (MOS); standing posture; toe link

Year:  2021        PMID: 33718440      PMCID: PMC7952635          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.613038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  33 in total

1.  Relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip.

Authors:  Raymond Y W Lee; Thomas K T Wong
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Postural control: toe-standing versus heel-toe standing.

Authors:  Lee Nolan; D Casey Kerrigan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control.

Authors:  Christoph Maurer; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Modeling of postural stability borders during heel-toe rocking.

Authors:  Chantelle D Murnaghan; Beth Elston; Dawn C Mackey; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Performance Evaluation of Lower Limb Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Pinto-Fernandez; Diego Torricelli; Maria Del Carmen Sanchez-Villamanan; Felix Aller; Katja Mombaur; Roberto Conti; Nicola Vitiello; Juan C Moreno; Jose Luis Pons
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Postural stability in stroke patients: vectorial expression of asymmetry, sway activity and relative sequence of reactive forces.

Authors:  J Mizrahi; P Solzi; H Ring; R Nisell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Human-like compliant locomotion: state of the art of robotic implementations.

Authors:  Diego Torricelli; Jose Gonzalez; Maarten Weckx; René Jiménez-Fabián; Bram Vanderborght; Massimo Sartori; Strahinja Dosen; Dario Farina; Dirk Lefeber; Jose L Pons
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.956

8.  Once-per-step control of ankle-foot prosthesis push-off work reduces effort associated with balance during walking.

Authors:  Myunghee Kim; Steven H Collins
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  A comparison of stability metrics based on inverted pendulum models for assessment of ramp walking.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Pickle; Jason M Wilken; Nicholas P Fey; Anne K Silverman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stability of Mina v2 for Robot-Assisted Balance and Locomotion.

Authors:  Carlotta Mummolo; William Z Peng; Shlok Agarwal; Robert Griffin; Peter D Neuhaus; Joo H Kim
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Computational Framework Towards the Tele-Rehabilitation of Balance Control Skills.

Authors:  Kubra Akbas; Carlotta Mummolo
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-06-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.