Qi Liu1,2, Zezhi Shan1,2, Dakui Luo1,2, Sheng Zhang1,2, Qingguo Li1,2, Xinxiang Li1,2. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Based on a prognostic scoring system (P score) proposed by us recently, this retrospective large population-based and propensity score-matched (PSM) study focused on predicting the survival benefit of adjuvant CT in stage II disease. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer (N = 73397) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 2005 and divided into the CT and non-CT groups. PSM balanced the patient characteristics between the CT and non-CT groups. RESULTS: The magnitude of CSS improvement among patients treated with adjuvant CT was significantly associated with the P score, score 8 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.580, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.323-1.040, P = 0.067] was associated with a much higher increased CSS benefit among patients treated with adjuvant CT as compared to score 2* (*, including scores 0, 1, and 2; HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.089-1.644, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: High P scores were demonstrated to be associated with superior survival benefit of adjuvant CT. Therapy decisions of adjuvant CT in stage II colon cancer could be tailored on the basis of tumor biology, patient characteristics and the P score.
BACKGROUND: Based on a prognostic scoring system (P score) proposed by us recently, this retrospective large population-based and propensity score-matched (PSM) study focused on predicting the survival benefit of adjuvant CT in stage II disease. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer (N = 73397) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 2005 and divided into the CT and non-CT groups. PSM balanced the patient characteristics between the CT and non-CT groups. RESULTS: The magnitude of CSS improvement among patients treated with adjuvant CT was significantly associated with the P score, score 8 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.580, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.323-1.040, P = 0.067] was associated with a much higher increased CSS benefit among patients treated with adjuvant CT as compared to score 2* (*, including scores 0, 1, and 2; HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.089-1.644, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: High P scores were demonstrated to be associated with superior survival benefit of adjuvant CT. Therapy decisions of adjuvant CT in stage II colon cancer could be tailored on the basis of tumor biology, patient characteristics and the P score.
Authors: M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Til Stürmer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Stacey A Fedewa; Dennis J Ahnen; Reinier G S Meester; Afsaneh Barzi; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Aalok Kumar; Hagen F Kennecke; Daniel J Renouf; Howard J Lim; Sharlene Gill; Ryan Woods; Caroline Speers; Winson Y Cheung Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu; Shyamsunder Sukumar; Magesh Sathaiah; Meredith Mahan; Kothai Divya Pragatheeshwar; James F Pingpank; Herbert Zeh; Christopher J Bartels; Kenneth K W Lee; David L Bartlett Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Erin S O'Connor; David Yu Greenblatt; Noelle K LoConte; Ronald E Gangnon; Jinn-Ing Liou; Charles P Heise; Maureen A Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Al B Benson; Deborah Schrag; Mark R Somerfield; Alfred M Cohen; Alvaro T Figueredo; Patrick J Flynn; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Jean Maroun; Pamela McAllister; Eric Van Cutsem; Melissa Brouwers; Manya Charette; Daniel G Haller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Masoud Babaei; Yesilda Balavarca; Lina Jansen; Valery Lemmens; Felice N van Erning; Liesbet van Eycken; Evelien Vaes; Annika Sjövall; Bengt Glimelius; Cornelia M Ulrich; Petra Schrotz-King; Hermann Brenner Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Paul Lochhead; Aya Kuchiba; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Mai Yamauchi; Reiko Nishihara; Zhi Rong Qian; Teppei Morikawa; Jeanne Shen; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Min Ki Kim; Daeyoun David Won; Sun Min Park; Taejung Kim; Sung Ryong Kim; Seong Taek Oh; Seung Kook Sohn; Mi Yeon Kang; In Kyu Lee Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 4.679