Mantu Jain1, Chitta Ranjan Mohnaty2, Jagannatha Sahoo3, Rakesh Vadakkethil Radhakrishnan4, Mridul Biswas1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India. 2. Department of Trauma and Emergency, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India. 4. College of Nursing, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spine is a rapidly growing branch with fully-dedicated peer-reviewed journals. Journal impact factor (JIF), speed of publication, and readership are some critical factors affecting the author's choice for submission. This study aimed to find the bibliometric data of spine journals. METHOD: Fourteen Spine journals in NCBI (National centre for Biotechnology information, USA) database, meeting the inclusion criterion were analyzed for original articles, collected via stratified sampling from each issue of the journal. The dates to submission (DS), acceptance (DA), and publication (DP), study design, corresponding author's details like-subject specialization and country of affiliation were recorded for each original article. Data on JIF, number of issues/years, open access availability (OA), article processing charges (APC) were also retrieved. Correlation and geographic plot were used to display the findings. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time for submission to publication/total time (TT) in spine journals was 175 (120-313) days with a submission to acceptance time of 107 (66-168) days and acceptance to publication time of 54 (20-170). Fifty-seven percent of the journals had APC, and all had options for OA. A significant correlation was noted between all determinants of publication speed and the Scimago Journal rankings (SJR) (AT: r = 0.238, PT: r = 0.074, TT: r = 0.288, p < 0.001). Amongst the author affiliations, the USA (37.5%) and Japan (18.6%) had the maximum contributions. Furthermore, 57.4% of authors were orthopaedicians, and 14.4% were neurosurgeons. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies were the standard study designs (48% vs. 20.9%), while clinical trials accounted for 5.8%. CONCLUSION: Spine journals had comparable publication speed with other biomedical journals; all spine journals had OA options. Observational study dominates the pattern in spine research. The contribution is mainly from orthopaedician, but the trend is changing towards collaborative research with neurosurgeons.
BACKGROUND: Spine is a rapidly growing branch with fully-dedicated peer-reviewed journals. Journal impact factor (JIF), speed of publication, and readership are some critical factors affecting the author's choice for submission. This study aimed to find the bibliometric data of spine journals. METHOD: Fourteen Spine journals in NCBI (National centre for Biotechnology information, USA) database, meeting the inclusion criterion were analyzed for original articles, collected via stratified sampling from each issue of the journal. The dates to submission (DS), acceptance (DA), and publication (DP), study design, corresponding author's details like-subject specialization and country of affiliation were recorded for each original article. Data on JIF, number of issues/years, open access availability (OA), article processing charges (APC) were also retrieved. Correlation and geographic plot were used to display the findings. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time for submission to publication/total time (TT) in spine journals was 175 (120-313) days with a submission to acceptance time of 107 (66-168) days and acceptance to publication time of 54 (20-170). Fifty-seven percent of the journals had APC, and all had options for OA. A significant correlation was noted between all determinants of publication speed and the Scimago Journal rankings (SJR) (AT: r = 0.238, PT: r = 0.074, TT: r = 0.288, p < 0.001). Amongst the author affiliations, the USA (37.5%) and Japan (18.6%) had the maximum contributions. Furthermore, 57.4% of authors were orthopaedicians, and 14.4% were neurosurgeons. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies were the standard study designs (48% vs. 20.9%), while clinical trials accounted for 5.8%. CONCLUSION: Spine journals had comparable publication speed with other biomedical journals; all spine journals had OA options. Observational study dominates the pattern in spine research. The contribution is mainly from orthopaedician, but the trend is changing towards collaborative research with neurosurgeons.
Authors: Matthew E Falagas; Vasilios D Kouranos; Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos Journal: FASEB J Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Gregory L Cvetanovich; Yale A Fillingham; Joshua D Harris; Brandon J Erickson; Nikhil N Verma; Bernard R Bach Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Alex M Hollenberg; David N Bernstein; Avionna L Baldwin; Michael-John Beltejar; Paul T Rubery; Addisu Mesfin Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Thomas Stamm; Ulrich Meyer; Hans-Peter Wiesmann; Johannes Kleinheinz; Murat Cehreli; Zafer C Cehreli Journal: Head Face Med Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 2.151