Literature DB >> 33717893

Role of a bone conserving short stem femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: A case report.

Babaji Thorat1, Avtar Singh1, Rajeev Vohra1.   

Abstract

Choice of the implant during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is crucial in younger patients due to the impaired quality of bone and deficient bone stock. The short femoral stem provides an appealing unorthodox alternative implant in young patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. A classic revision total hip arthroplasty predominantly describes the use of conventional or long stem for revision of the femoral component. However, little is known about the use of short femoral stem in revision THA. This case report discusses the revision of cemented conventional femoral stem using a bone-conserving short-stem femoral implant with circumferential metaphyseal fixation, which is seldom reported in the literature. Associated benefits are less aggressive surgery with a reduction in blood loss, magnitude and duration of surgery by avoiding the removal of distal cement in the femur canal, thus making the femoral component revision easier. Moreover, it facilitates postoperative rehabilitation and recovery as well. Also, it preserves the femoral bone stock and offers a long term solution especially in young patients retaining the choice of using a conventional or long stem femoral implant should a second revision becomes imperative.
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral component revision; Revision; Short femoral stem; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33717893      PMCID: PMC7920142          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  10 in total

1.  Thigh pain in primary total hip arthroplasty: the effects of elastic moduli.

Authors:  Carlos Lavernia; Michele D'Apuzzo; Victor Hernandez; David Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Removal of well-fixed fixed femoral stems.

Authors:  J-M Laffosse
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  Revision hip arthroplasty with a short femoral component in fractured hydroxyapatite fully coated femoral stem.

Authors:  María José Sangüesa-Nebot; Francisco Cabanes Soriano; Rafael Fernández Gabarda; Carlos Valverde Mordt
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a tapered, press-fit cementless revision stem in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jun-Dong Chang; Tae-Young Kim; Murari Bhaskar Rao; Sang-Soo Lee; In-Sung Kim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.

Authors:  S M Madey; J J Callaghan; J P Olejniczak; D D Goetz; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  R W McCalden; A Korczak; L Somerville; X Yuan; D D Naudie
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Michael Liebensteiner; Mark Agreiter; Andreas Leithner; Nikolaus Böhler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

9.  Short Stems Versus Conventional Stems in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Registry Study.

Authors:  Federico Giardina; Francesco Castagnini; Susanna Stea; Barbara Bordini; Maurizio Montalti; Aldo Toni
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Ke Zhao; Michael Kelly; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.