Literature DB >> 33717886

Analysis of vertical and horizontal offsets in displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly treated with indigenous bicentric bipolar hip device.

Anil Kumar Rai1, Sanjay Yadav1, Vishal Verma1, Saurabh Anand1, Subhanshu Shekhar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effect of indigenous bicentric bipolar prosthesis on horizontal and vertical offsets in fracture neck of femur when compared to contralateral normal hip and to evaluate functional outcomes. We hypothesized that our non-modular bipolar device restores satisfactory offsets in such patients.
METHODS: All active elderly patients with displaced fracture NOF having contralateral normal hip were included. We used an indigenous bicentric bipolar hip-prosthesis, which is a non-modular single-piece device in all cases by lateral Hardinge approach. Postoperative radiograph AP view was taken in 15° internal rotation to decrease the effect of limb rotation on offset. CT scan was also used to evaluate offsets using ADW4.6 ADVANCED GE optima 128 slice software system. Subjects were followed for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively and functional outcome of effect of offsets change were evaluated by modified Harris Hip Score.
RESULTS: There is minimal difference in horizontal and vertical offset after bicentric bipolar hemi-replacement which is statistically insignificant supporting our hypothesis. The clinical outcomes were good to fair according to modified Harris Hip Score. The mean value of horizontal offset after our bipolar hemireplacement was 42.4 ± 2.04 mm and of normal hip was 41.8 ± 1.81 mm and P-value=0.08 in plain radiographs and value of horizontal offset in CT scan was 40.73 ± 0.27on bipolar side and 41.19 ± 0.77 on normal side. Vertical offset after bicentric bipolar was 32.67 ± 2.85 mm and vertical offset of normal hip was 32.53 ± 2.73 mm. Mean 9.77 ± 1.09 mm of calcar was preserved. Modified Harris Hip Score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively was 75.78 ± 4.16 and 79.53 ± 3.95 respectively. There was no incidence of hip dislocation.
CONCLUSION: Our study data clearly demonstrates that vertical and horizontal offsets are effectively maintained by the indigenous bicentric hip device. There was insignificant change in offsets as compared to contralateral normal side due to its design modifications. Indigenous bicentric non-modular bipolar device offers an excellent option for femur neck fractures in elderly patients in resource constrained situations. It allows rapid rehabilitation due to reduced surgical time, minimal blood loss and early return to function and activities of daily living.
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bicentric; Bipolar; Femur; Fracture; Hemiarthroplasty; Neck; Offset

Year:  2020        PMID: 33717886      PMCID: PMC7920007          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  16 in total

1.  Radiographic preoperative templating of extra-offset cemented THA implants: how reliable is it and how does it affect survival?

Authors:  F Bachour; E Marchetti; D Bocquet; L Vasseur; H Migaud; J Girard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  Medium-term results of the Charnley low-offset femoral stem.

Authors:  A Ebied; D A Hoad-Reddick; V Raut
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

3.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M C Faugere; A M Mackel; T A Gruen; B Bognar; H H Malluche
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Total hip arthroplasty: the relationship between posterolateral reconstruction, abductor muscle strength, and femoral offset.

Authors:  T Yamaguchi; M Naito; I Asayama; T Ishiko
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.118

5.  Epidemiology of hip fracture: Worldwide geographic variation.

Authors:  Dinesh K Dhanwal; Elaine M Dennison; Nick C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: comparing in-hospital mortality, complications, and disposition to an elective patient population.

Authors:  Adam Sassoon; Michele D'Apuzzo; Stephen Sems; Joseph Cass; Tad Mabry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Lecerf; M H Fessy; R Philippot; P Massin; F Giraud; X Flecher; J Girard; P Mertl; E Marchetti; E Stindel
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 8.  Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Ryan G Miyamoto; Kevin M Kaplan; Brett R Levine; Kenneth A Egol; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Treatment of fractures of the femoral neck by replacement with the Thompson prosthesis.

Authors:  J D'Arcy; M Devas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-08

10.  The BHU bicentric bipolar prosthesis in fracture neck femur in active elderly.

Authors:  Anil K Rai; Rakesh Agarwal; Saurabh Singh; Ratnav Ratan
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2008-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.