Literature DB >> 33717276

Presenters or Patients? A Crucial Distinction in Individual Health Assessments.

G Owen Schaefer1.   

Abstract

Individual health assessments (IHAs) for asymptomatic individuals provide a challenge to traditional distinctions between patient care and non-medical practice. They may involve undue radiation exposure, lead to false positives, and involve high out-of-pocket costs for recipients. A recent paper (Journal of the American College of Radiology 13(12): 1447-1457.e1, 2016) has criticised the use of IHAs and argued that recipients should be classified as 'presenters', not 'patients', to distinguish it from regular medical care. I critique this classificatory move, on two grounds: one, it is conceptually suspect. Two, it obviates the medical ethics framework for IHAs, potentially exposing recipients of IHAs to lower standards of oversight and protection. Responsible regulation of IHAs will be easier to ethically justify if those seeking IHAs are considered patients and not merely presenters. © National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymptomatic screening; Computed tomography; Individual health assessments; Medical ethics; Medical language

Year:  2018        PMID: 33717276      PMCID: PMC7745765          DOI: 10.1007/s41649-018-0044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev        ISSN: 1793-9453


  11 in total

1.  Doctor-patient relationship: a covenant of trust.

Authors:  J J Chin
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The gray zones of privatized imaging.

Authors:  Patricia W Lau; Judy Illes
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Korea's thyroid-cancer "epidemic"--screening and overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Hyeong Sik Ahn; Hyun Jung Kim; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  23andMe and the FDA.

Authors:  George J Annas; Sherman Elias
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Talya Salz; Sarah E Lillie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; Stuart G Baker; Pamela M Marcus; Jonathan D Clapp; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Are we being exposed to radiation in the hospital?

Authors:  Yeonghee Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-14

9.  Level of radiation dose in university hospital noninsured private health screening programs in Korea.

Authors:  Yun-Keun Lee
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-24

Review 10.  Justification of CT for Individual Health Assessment of Asymptomatic Persons: A World Health Organization Consultation.

Authors:  Jim Malone; Maria Del Rosario Perez; Eva Godske Friberg; Mathias Prokop; Seung Eun Jung; Jurgen Griebel; Steve Ebdon-Jackson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.