Anne Guhn1, David Schön1, Yvonne Zische1, Philipp Sterzer1, Stephan Köhler1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
Background: The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) has been tailored specifically to the demands of patients with persistent depressive disorder (PDD). According to the CBASP model, PDD patients are supposed to live perceptually disconnected from their social environment, which consequently maintains depression. While initially developed as an individual treatment modality, the adaptation for group therapy yields an important interpersonal space. However, little is known about the specific factors that contribute to patients' benefit from the CBASP group modality. Methods: The analyzed sample comprised N = 87 PDD patients who completed a 12 week multimodal inpatient treatment including 2 weekly CBASP-specific individual and group sessions, respectively, as well as CBASP-unspecific medical contacts, pharmacotherapy and complementary therapies. Group sessions included trainings in situational analysis and interpersonal skills. Interpersonal change over therapy was examined based on the patients' self-perceived interpersonal problems (IIP) and the impact messages as perceived by their individual therapists (IMI). Pre and post-treatment data were compared using within-sample t-tests. Additionally, patients evaluated CBASP group therapy on a feedback form. They were invited to reflect on individual benefits and its helpful and unhelpful aspects. Qualitative content analysis with inductive category development was used to analyze feedback. Inter-rater reliability was computed to confirm categories before summarizing the frequencies of reported factors. Results: Self-perceived interpersonal distress significantly decreased over therapy. Patients reported reduced interpersonal problems and therapists reported more friendly and dominant impact messages. Interestingly, patients who showed a significant depressive symptom reduction described higher change scores. Regarding qualitative data, patients reported five main benefits from group therapy: Gain in social competence, self-confidence, self-reflection, interpersonal dynamics, and optimism/universality. Patients responding to CBASP identified significantly more factors than non-responders. Conclusions: Compared to studies with individual CBASP only, the present findings suggest that CBASP group therapy may contribute to the improvement of interpersonal behavior. Group therapy is discussed as a potential boosting effect for individual CBASP. However, as the present data were collected in a multimodal inpatient setting without competitor, randomized controlled trials are warranted that investigate the specific benefits of the group modality or the combined individual and group therapy over individual CBASP only.
Background: The Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) has been tailored specifically to the demands of patients with persistent depressive disorder (PDD). According to the CBASP model, PDDpatients are supposed to live perceptually disconnected from their social environment, which consequently maintains depression. While initially developed as an individual treatment modality, the adaptation for group therapy yields an important interpersonal space. However, little is known about the specific factors that contribute to patients' benefit from the CBASP group modality. Methods: The analyzed sample comprised N = 87 PDDpatients who completed a 12 week multimodal inpatient treatment including 2 weekly CBASP-specific individual and group sessions, respectively, as well as CBASP-unspecific medical contacts, pharmacotherapy and complementary therapies. Group sessions included trainings in situational analysis and interpersonal skills. Interpersonal change over therapy was examined based on the patients' self-perceived interpersonal problems (IIP) and the impact messages as perceived by their individual therapists (IMI). Pre and post-treatment data were compared using within-sample t-tests. Additionally, patients evaluated CBASP group therapy on a feedback form. They were invited to reflect on individual benefits and its helpful and unhelpful aspects. Qualitative content analysis with inductive category development was used to analyze feedback. Inter-rater reliability was computed to confirm categories before summarizing the frequencies of reported factors. Results: Self-perceived interpersonal distress significantly decreased over therapy. Patients reported reduced interpersonal problems and therapists reported more friendly and dominant impact messages. Interestingly, patients who showed a significant depressive symptom reduction described higher change scores. Regarding qualitative data, patients reported five main benefits from group therapy: Gain in social competence, self-confidence, self-reflection, interpersonal dynamics, and optimism/universality. Patients responding to CBASP identified significantly more factors than non-responders. Conclusions: Compared to studies with individual CBASP only, the present findings suggest that CBASP group therapy may contribute to the improvement of interpersonal behavior. Group therapy is discussed as a potential boosting effect for individual CBASP. However, as the present data were collected in a multimodal inpatient setting without competitor, randomized controlled trials are warranted that investigate the specific benefits of the group modality or the combined individual and group therapy over individual CBASP only.
Keywords:
CBASP; Kiesler's circle training; change factors in group therapy; group therapy; interpersonal problems; interpersonal style; situational analysis
Authors: Jan Philipp Klein; Nele Erkens; Ulrich Schweiger; Levente Kriston; Paul Bausch; Ingo Zobel; Martin Hautzinger; Dieter Schoepf; Ilinca Serbanescu; Josef Bailer; Matthias Backenstrass; Katrin Wambach; Henrik Walter; Martin Härter; Elisabeth Schramm Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Jan Philipp Klein; Thomas Probst; Levente Kriston; Nele Assmann; Josef Bailer; Hannah Eich; Ulrich Schweiger; Nikola Maria Stenzel; Katrin Wambach; Martin Hautzinger; Martin Härter; Elisabeth Schramm Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Ilinca Serbanescu; Henrik Walter; Knut Schnell; Henrik Kessler; Bernd Weber; Sarah Drost; Magdalena Groß; Peter Neudeck; Jan Philipp Klein; Nele Assmann; Ingo Zobel; Matthias Backenstrass; Martin Hautzinger; Ramona Meister; Martin Härter; Elisabeth Schramm; Dieter Schoepf Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2019-11-04
Authors: Michael J Constantino; Holly B Laws; Bruce A Arnow; Daniel N Klein; Barbara O Rothbaum; Rachel Manber Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2012-04-30
Authors: Charles B Nemeroff; Christine M Heim; Michael E Thase; Daniel N Klein; A John Rush; Alan F Schatzberg; Philip T Ninan; James P McCullough; Paul M Weiss; David L Dunner; Barbara O Rothbaum; Susan Kornstein; Gabor Keitner; Martin B Keller Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 11.205