Literature DB >> 33716787

Efficacy of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on Body Composition and Muscle Strength in Non-athletic Adults. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Wolfgang Kemmler1, Mahdieh Shojaa1, James Steele2,3, Joshua Berger4, Michael Fröhlich4, Daniel Schoene1, Simon von Stengel1, Heinz Kleinöder5, Matthias Kohl6.   

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis set out to determine the efficacy on whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on body composition and strength parameters in non-athletic cohorts. A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA statement included (a) controlled trials, (b) WB-EMS trials with at least one exercise and one control group, (c) WB-EMS as primary physical intervention, (d) WB-EMS with at least six electrodes covering most muscle groups, (e) non-athletic cohorts. We searched eight electronic databases up to June 30, 2020, without language restrictions. Standardized mean differences (SMD) for muscle mass parameters, total body fat mass, maximum leg extension, and trunk extension strength were defined as outcome measures. In summary, 16 studies with 19 individual WB-EMS groups representing 897 participants were included. Studies vary considerably with respect to age, BMI, and physical conditions. Impulse protocols of the studies were roughly comparable, but training frequency (1-5 sessions/week) and intervention length (6-54 weeks) differed between the studies. SMD average was 1.23 (95%-CI: 0.71-1.76) for muscle mass, 0.98 (0.74-1.22) for maximum leg, and 1.08 (0.78-1.39) for maximum trunk extension strength changes (all p < 0.001). SMD for body fat changes (-0.40, [-0.98 to 0.17]), however, did not reach significance. I 2 and Q-statistics revealed substantial heterogeneity of muscle and fat mass changes between the trials. However, rank and regression tests did not indicate positive evidence for small-study bias and funnel plot asymmetries. This work provided further evidence for significant, large-sized effects of WB-EMS on muscle mass and strength parameters, but not on body fat mass. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, PROSPERO; ID: CRD42020183059.
Copyright © 2021 Kemmler, Shojaa, Steele, Berger, Fröhlich, Schoene, von Stengel, Kleinöder and Kohl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body composition; body fat mass; exercise; lean body mass; muscle strength; whole-body electromyostimulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33716787      PMCID: PMC7952886          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.640657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


  48 in total

1.  PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy.

Authors:  C Sherrington; R D Herbert; C G Maher; A M Moseley
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  Dietary protein supplementation in the elderly for limiting muscle mass loss.

Authors:  Antonio Herbert Lancha; Rudyard Zanella; Stefan Gleissner Ohara Tanabe; Mireille Andriamihaja; Francois Blachier
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.520

3.  Effects of Loaded Squat Exercise with and without Application of Superimposed EMS on Physical Performance.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; Christoph Zinner; Ulrike Doermann; Heinz Kleinoeder; Joachim Mester
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Effects of Combined Whole-Body Electromyostimulation and Protein Supplementation on Local and Overall Muscle/Fat Distribution in Older Men with Sarcopenic Obesity: The Randomized Controlled Franconia Sarcopenic Obesity (FranSO) Study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Alexandra Grimm; Michael Bebenek; Matthias Kohl; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Influence of Whole-Body Electrostimulation on Human Red Blood Cell Deformability.

Authors:  Andre Filipovic; Heinz Kleinöder; Denise Plück; Wildor Hollmann; Wilhelm Bloch; Marijke Grau
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-01

7.  The efficacy and safety of whole-body electromyostimulation in applying to human body: based from graded exercise test.

Authors:  Yong-Seok Jee
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-26

8.  Whole-body electromyostimulation as a means to impact muscle mass and abdominal body fat in lean, sedentary, older female adults: subanalysis of the TEST-III trial.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation versus High-Intensity Resistance Exercise on Body Composition and Strength: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Marc Teschler; Anja Weißenfels; Michael Bebenek; Michael Fröhlich; Matthias Kohl; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation on chronic nonspecific low back pain in adults: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Anja Weissenfels; Marc Teschler; Sebastian Willert; Michael Hettchen; Michael Fröhlich; Heinz Kleinöder; Matthias Kohl; Simon von Stengel; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.133

View more
  6 in total

1.  Therapeutic Potential of Electromyostimulation (EMS) in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maryam Balke; Marc Teschler; Hendrik Schäfer; Pantea Pape; Frank C Mooren; Boris Schmitz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Profile of Whole Body Electromyostimulation Training Users-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Luiz Rodrigues-Santana; Hugo Louro; Ángel Denche-Zamorano; Alejandro Vega-Muñoz; Nicolás Contreras-Barraza; Jose Carmelo Adsuar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Feasibility and Safety of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation in Frail Older People-A Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Joerg Bloeckl; Sebastian Raps; Michael Weineck; Robert Kob; Thomas Bertsch; Wolfgang Kemmler; Daniel Schoene
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation training on upper limb muscles strength and body composition in moderately trained males: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Yin Qin; Hui Chen; Xiaoying Liu; Jiwei Wu; Yinxin Zhang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-09

5.  Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Whole Body Electromyostimulation.

Authors:  Luiz Rodrigues-Santana; José Carmelo Adsuar; Ángel Denche-Zamorano; Alejandro Vega-Muñoz; Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda; Nicolás Contreras-Barraza; Carmen Galán-Arroyo; Hugo Louro
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12

6.  Once-Weekly Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Increases Strength, Stability and Body Composition in Amateur Golfers. A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Carina Zink-Rückel; Matthias Kohl; Sebastian Willert; Simon von Stengel; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.