Literature DB >> 33716600

Using Visual Timelines in Telephone Interviews: Reflections and Lessons Learned From the Star Family Study.

Bethan Pell1, Denitza Williams2, Rhiannon Phillips3, Julia Sanders4, Adrian Edwards2, Ernest Choy5, Aimee Grant6.   

Abstract

Visual timeline methods have been used as part of face-to-face qualitative interviewing with vulnerable populations to uncover the intricacies of lived experiences, but little is known about whether visual timelines can be effectively used in telephone interviews. In this article, we reflect on the process of using visual timelines in 16 telephone interviews with women as part of the "STarting a family when you have an Autoimmune Rheumatic disease" study (STAR Family Study). The visual timeline method was used to empower women to organize and share their narratives about the sensitive and complex topic of starting a family. We conducted a thematic analysis of the audio-recorded interview data, using researchers' field notes and reflections to provide context for our understanding of the benefits of using timelines and to understand the process of using visual timelines during telephone interviews. Resource packs were sent to women before study participation; 11 of the 16 women completed a version of the timeline activity. Six themes were identified in the methodological data analysis: (1) use and adaptation of the timeline tool, (2) timeline exchange, (3) framing the interview: emphasizing that women are in control, (4) jumping straight in, (5) taking a lead, and (6) disclosing personal and sensitive experiences. The use of visual timelines facilitated interviewee control and elicited rich narratives of participants' experiences in telephone interviews. Women created their visual timelines autonomously and retained ownership of their timeline data; these features of the data generation process need to be considered when using visual timelines in telephone rather than face-to-face interviews. Use of visual methods within telephone interviews is feasible, can generate rich data, and should be further explored in a wider range of settings.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; data collection; empowerment; interviews; life stories; lived experience; marginalized or vulnerable populations; power; qualitative methods; reflexivity; research participation; visual methods

Year:  2020        PMID: 33716600      PMCID: PMC7901046          DOI: 10.1177/1609406920913675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Methods        ISSN: 1609-4069


  17 in total

Review 1.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?

Authors:  R S Barbour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

Review 2.  Clinical aspects of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Fiona Goldblatt; Sean G O'Neill
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Getting quality in qualitative research: a short introduction to feminist methodology and methods.

Authors:  Maeve Landman
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.297

Review 4.  Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Catherine Y Spong; Danuta Krotoski; Nancy L Shinowara; Sean C Blackwell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus 1992-1998 using the UK General Practice Research Database.

Authors:  Alison L Nightingale; Richard D T Farmer; Corinne S de Vries
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Participants' views of telephone interviews within a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Kim Ward; Merryn Gott; Karen Hoare
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Using participant-empowered visual relationship timelines in a qualitative study of sexual behaviour.

Authors:  Tamar Goldenberg; Catherine Finneran; Karen L Andes; Rob Stephenson
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2016-04-19

8.  Developmental changes in executive functioning.

Authors:  Kerry Lee; Rebecca Bull; Ringo M H Ho
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-04-01

9.  Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability.

Authors:  Målfrid Råheim; Liv Heide Magnussen; Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse; Åshild Lunde; Torild Jacobsen; Astrid Blystad
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-06-14

10.  Reaching a consensus on research priorities for supporting women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during pre-conception, pregnancy and early parenting: A Nominal Group Technique exercise with lay and professional stakeholders.

Authors:  Rhiannon Phillips; Denitza Williams; Daniel Bowen; Delyth Morris; Aimee Grant; Bethan Pell; Julia Sanders; Ann Taylor; Ernest Choy; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2018-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.