Sean Dolan1, Brooke Arterberry2, Alan Davis3. 1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5510 Nathan Shock Dr, Baltimore, 21224 United States. 2. Iowa State University, Psychology, 901 Stange Road, Ames, 50011-2140 United States. 3. Ohio State University, College of Social Work, Stillman Hall, 1947 College Rd, Columbus, 43210-1132 United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying factors that can be targeted in intervention/prevention programs aimed at reducing marijuana-(MJ) related consequences is of critical concern due to the changing legislative landscape of MJ. The dualistic model of passion for MJ has indicated that two factors, obsessive passion (OP) and harmonious passion (HP), have unique effects associated with MJ use outcomes. New research suggests that a quadripartite approach could provide a more nuanced method to interpret risk and protective factors associated with MJ use. Therefore, we used moderation to investigate the associations among OP, HP, and MJ use outcomes. METHOD: A community sample of frequent MJ users was recruited using internet-based advertisements and completed web-based surveys (n=161; M age=27.3, SD=8.9; Male=87%; White/Caucasian=86%; M past30-dayMJuse=22.3, SD=9.9). HP was tested as the moderator between OP, and MJ related outcomes and conditional effects (+/-1 SD) were examined when interaction effects were significant. RESULTS: Only main effects for OP had a relation to quantity/frequency of MJ use and MJ intoxication, while main effects for OP and HP were associated with reduction attempts. Interaction effects were significant for MJ consequences, craving, and life satisfaction. Neither OP nor HP were significantly associated with substance use outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate that Pure OP and Mixed Passion are associated with greater risk. Mixed Passion may be a precursor to Pure OP and experiencing MJ-related consequences. Furthermore, Mixed Passion and Pure OP may be important targets for intervention/prevention programs designed to reduce negative outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Identifying factors that can be targeted in intervention/prevention programs aimed at reducing marijuana-(MJ) related consequences is of critical concern due to the changing legislative landscape of MJ. The dualistic model of passion for MJ has indicated that two factors, obsessive passion (OP) and harmonious passion (HP), have unique effects associated with MJ use outcomes. New research suggests that a quadripartite approach could provide a more nuanced method to interpret risk and protective factors associated with MJ use. Therefore, we used moderation to investigate the associations among OP, HP, and MJ use outcomes. METHOD: A community sample of frequent MJ users was recruited using internet-based advertisements and completed web-based surveys (n=161; M age=27.3, SD=8.9; Male=87%; White/Caucasian=86%; M past30-dayMJuse=22.3, SD=9.9). HP was tested as the moderator between OP, and MJ related outcomes and conditional effects (+/-1 SD) were examined when interaction effects were significant. RESULTS: Only main effects for OP had a relation to quantity/frequency of MJ use and MJ intoxication, while main effects for OP and HP were associated with reduction attempts. Interaction effects were significant for MJ consequences, craving, and life satisfaction. Neither OP nor HP were significantly associated with substance use outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate that Pure OP and Mixed Passion are associated with greater risk. Mixed Passion may be a precursor to Pure OP and experiencing MJ-related consequences. Furthermore, Mixed Passion and Pure OP may be important targets for intervention/prevention programs designed to reduce negative outcomes.
Authors: Lonneke J van Nimwegen; Lieuwe de Haan; Nico Jm van Beveren; Mischa van der Helm; Wim van den Brink; Don Linszen Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Andrew A Monte; Shelby K Shelton; Eleanor Mills; Jessica Saben; Andrew Hopkinson; Brandon Sonn; Michael Devivo; Tae Chang; Jacob Fox; Cody Brevik; Kayla Williamson; Diana Abbott Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: John R Hughes; James R Fingar; Alan J Budney; Shelly Naud; John E Helzer; Peter W Callas Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Mai-Ly N Steers; Clayton Neighbors; M Christina Hove; Nichole Olson; Christine M Lee Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: N Dekker; A M Smeerdijk; R W Wiers; J H Duits; G van Gelder; K Houben; G Schippers; D H Linszen; L de Haan Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Nora D Volkow; James M Swanson; A Eden Evins; Lynn E DeLisi; Madeline H Meier; Raul Gonzalez; Michael A P Bloomfield; H Valerie Curran; Ruben Baler Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 21.596