Literature DB >> 33716401

Effects of animacy and sentence type on silent reading comprehension in aphasia: An eye-tracking study.

Gayle DeDe1, Denis Kelleher1.   

Abstract

The present study examined how healthy aging and aphasia influence the capacity for readers to generate structural predictions during online reading, and how animacy cues influence this process. Non-brain-damaged younger (n =24) and older (n =12) adults (Experiment 1) and individuals with aphasia (IWA; n =11; Experiment 2) read subject relative and object relative sentences in an eye-tracking experiment. Half of the sentences included animate sentential subjects, and the other half included inanimate sentential subjects. All three groups used animacy information to mitigate effects of syntactic complexity. These effects were greater in older than younger adults. IWA were sensitive to structural frequency, with longer reading times for object relative than subject relative sentences. As in previous work, effects of structural complexity did not emerge on IWA's first pass through the sentence, but were observed when IWA reread critical segments of the sentences. Thus, IWA may adopt atypical reading strategies when they encounter low frequency or complex sentence structures, but they are able to use animacy information to reduce the processing disruptions associated with these structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reading comprehension; aging; aphasia; eye-tracking; sentence comprehension

Year:  2020        PMID: 33716401      PMCID: PMC7945721          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurolinguistics        ISSN: 0911-6044            Impact factor:   1.710


  21 in total

1.  Memory interference during language processing.

Authors:  P C Gordon; R Hendrick; M Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Effects of Verb Bias and Syntactic Ambiguity on Reading in People with Aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle Dede
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia.

Authors:  A Caramazza; E B Zurif
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: evidence for a staged architecture.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08

5.  The Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  M F Folstein; L N Robins; J E Helzer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1983-07

6.  Online Sentence Reading in People With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Jessica Knilans; Gayle DeDe
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Woohyuk Ji; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits.

Authors:  David Caplan; Jennifer Michaud; Rebecca Hufford
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Structural Prediction in Aphasia: Evidence from either.

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Michael Walsh Dickey; Chia-Ming Lei
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Cue Recognition and Integration - Eye Tracking Evidence of Processing Differences in Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia.

Authors:  Rahel Schumacher; Dario Cazzoli; Noëmi Eggenberger; Basil Preisig; Tobias Nef; Thomas Nyffeler; Klemens Gutbrod; Jean-Marie Annoni; René M Müri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.