Literature DB >> 33715995

The SIOG COVID-19 working group recommendations on the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines among older adults with cancer.

Anna Rachelle Mislang1, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis2, Chiara Russo3, Giuseppe Colloca4, Grant R Williams5, Shane O'Hanlon6, Lisa Cooper7, Anita O'Donovan8, Riccardo A Audisio9, Kwok-Leung Cheung10, Regina Gironés Sarrió11, Reinhard Stauder12, Michael Jaklitsch13, Clarito Cairo14, Luiz Antonio Gil15, Schroder Sattar16, Kumud Kantilal17, Kah Poh Loh18, Stuart M Lichtman19, Etienne Brain20, Hans Wildiers21, Ravindran Kanesvaran22, Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti23.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Cancer; Older patients; SIOG; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33715995      PMCID: PMC7934668          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol        ISSN: 1879-4068            Impact factor:   3.929


× No keyword cloud information.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to negatively impact our society. Older adults are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. People who are frail, living in residential care facility, and/or with comorbidities, including cancer are disproportionately disadvantaged. To reduce the risk of infection among older adults with cancer, several anticancer therapies have been prioritized, delayed, de-escalated, or omitted based on clinical need (1). However, public health interventions remain critical to mitigate transmission and minimize adverse outcomes. Of these, mass immunization is perhaps a more effective preventive health measure and potentially a key exit strategy from this crisis.

Considerations on the role of COVID-19 vaccines in older patients with cancer

To date, data on eight COVID-19 vaccines have been successfully submitted for authorization by the World Health Organization (2), five vaccines have reported results on efficacy and/or safety (Table 1 ), and over 50 are at various stages of development. As vaccines are made available to the general population, their rollout should be prioritized for those at higher risk of adverse outcomes including hospitalization and/or death. Older individuals are traditionally excluded from or underrepresented in clinical trials, and the same holds true for COVID-19 vaccine studies (3). Similarly, patients with cancer, comorbidities, or immunosuppression have been excluded. Therefore, clinicians are expected to make recommendations based on the risk-benefit ratio and extrapolation of trial data to the real world until more information becomes available.
Table 1

Summary of the published results on COVID-19 Vaccines and efficacy in older people (in alphabetical order).

VaccineNDesignTypeMain inclusion criteriaMain exclusion criteriaDose intervalEfficacyOlder adults inclusion and vaccine safety
AstraZenecaAZD1222 (5,12)11,636Single blindChimpanzee adenovirus vectored vaccineAge ≥ 18 yearsSevere or uncontrolled medical comorbiditiesParticipants aged ≥65 years with a Dalhousie Clinical Frailty Score of ≥4LD (2·2 × 1010 virus particles) or SD (3·5–6·5 × 1010 virus particles)x228 days apart70.4%≥70 years (9.5%)In phase II component <70 (n = 79) vs. ≥70 (n = 49) years:Similar antibody response across all age groupsFewer reactogenicity eventsLocalized AEs:82% vs. 61%Systemic AEs:82% vs. 65%
Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) (13)19,866Double blindrecombinant replication-deficient adenovirusAge ≥ 18 yearsImmunosuppression1 × 1011viral particles x 2, 21 days apart91.6%>60: 91.8%>60 years (10.8%)
Janssen Ad26.COV2·S (6)805Single blindModified adenovirusHealthy adults of 2 age cohorts1a: 18–55 years3: ≥65 yearsLD: (5 × 1010viral particles) or HD: (1 × 1011 viral particles) in single vs. 2 doses, 56 days apart>90%≥65 years (50%)Cohort 1a vs. 3Lower Immune responseLD: 100% vs. 91%HD: 100% vs. 94%Lower incidence of AEsLocalized AEsLD: 64% vs.41%HD: 65% vs.84%Systemic AEsLD: 78% vs. 42%HD: 46% vs. 55%
Moderna mRNA-1273 (14)30,420Double blindmRNAAge ≥ 18 yearsAt high risk of COVID-19 infection by location or comorbiditiesImmunosuppression100μg x2 28 days apart94.1%<64: 95.6%≥65: 86.4%>65 years (25%)Less common AEs in ≥65 (89%) vs. 18–64 (93%) years
Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b2 (15)43,548Double blindmRNAAge ≥ 16Healthy or stable chronic medical conditionsImmunosuppression30 μg x221 days apart95%>65 years (21%)Lower reactogenicity events in >55 years (2.8%) vs. 16–55 years (4.6%)

LD: low dose; HD: high dose; SD: standard dose; AE: adverse events

Summary of the published results on COVID-19 Vaccines and efficacy in older people (in alphabetical order). LD: low dose; HD: high dose; SD: standard dose; AE: adverse events The efficacy of vaccines relies on an intact host response, which could be disrupted in people with myelosuppression due to cancer or its treatment. Age-related dysregulation and immune dysfunction, called immunosenescence, could potentially result in lower immunogenicity of vaccines in older adults (4). Physical exercise may augment vaccine-specific antibody responses; however, activities are limited by the imposed counter-pandemic measures. An adjuvanted vaccine may be used to overcome immunosenescence, as shown in the AZD1222 trial (5). Variability in the relationship between neutralizing- and binding-antibody titres in older adults was seen in the Ad26.COV2·S trial (6). Nevertheless, vaccine efficacy appears to be consistent in older subgroups with a trend for lower reactogenicity (Table 1). Notably, these findings are all based on short-term analyses, where the long-term efficacy is still unclear. Also, these studies did not include frailty measures nor large groups of older individuals, which limit the characterization of those recruited. Longer follow-up from vaccine trials will provide insight into the impact of vaccination on COVID-19 transmissibility, asymptomatic infections, or emerging mutant strains. The role of anticancer treatments, age, frailty and functional status on vaccine efficacy also needs to be investigated. Despite these caveats, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) COVID-19 Working Group advocates for a call to action to prioritize older adults with cancer in the vaccine rollout to protect this vulnerable group from the adverse outcomes of COVID-19, even in the absence of robust data. The SIOG COVID-19 Working Group supports the following recommendations on the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines for all older patients with cancer: Therefore, SIOG joins the call of other international organizations for prioritizing patients at higher risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, specifically older adults with cancer, when implementing global and local vaccination plans.
RecommendationRationale
A. For immediate action
 Prioritize the rollout of vaccines to individuals at disproportionate risk of death and other complications from COVID-19, including older patients with active or progressive cancer, or anticancer therapy at high risk for immunosuppressionHigher 30-day all-cause mortality observed in patients with older age, comorbidities, active or progressive cancer (7).
 Implement the use of regulated vaccines at the earliest opportunity, especially in areas with high community transmission • For older patients receiving active anticancer therapy - if possible, schedule vaccination at the time of bone marrow function recovery and a few days before the next cycle to maximize its efficacy and minimize the impact of potential side effects on ongoing anticancer treatments.No specific data available on COVID-19 vaccine. Data extrapolated from experiences with influenza vaccine (8). Recommendations from the UK Chemotherapy Board and Public Health England “Green Book” on Immunization Against Infectious Disease.The efficacy and timing on patients on immunosuppressive therapy still needs to be established.
 Persevere with community-based intervention strategies, such as physical distancing, hand hygiene, mask wearing, and use of personal protective equipment to mitigate transmission, even for patients and healthcare professionals that have already been vaccinatedLimited evidence exists on the impact of vaccines on COVID-19 transmission.The timing and level of measures to contain the virus, such as travel restrictions, facilities shutdowns, and social distancing have impacted the incidence and mortality from COVID-19 (9).
 Facilitate the availability of vaccines for older adults with cancer living in low and middle-income countries by means of negotiation of fair prices and by equitable distribution of the vaccine supply through international collaborations and partnerships.In line with WHO recommendations for Let's #ACTogether for #VaccinEquity and the United Nations COVAX program.
 Ensure equitable and timely access to vaccines in older people within community, local, or national level.
 Prioritize older patients with cancer from socially and medically disadvantaged populations, including those with poor access to healthcare or from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, in vaccination campaigns.Higher incidence and mortality from COVID-19 in racial/ethnic minorities likely related to underlying disparities in social determinants of health (10).
 Create and disseminate educational messaging and risk communication campaigns aimed at convincing older adults with cancer and their caregivers of the value and safety of vaccinationAvoid “fake news”, misinformation, and minimize confusion from several media platforms by disseminating accurate information that is readily available/accessible to a wider audience.
 Foster collaboration with advocacy groups to dispel simplistic and populist statements suggesting that “access to vaccines should be prioritized based on the capacity to contribute to economy”, as these stigmatize aging people as a burden, thereby compromising ethics and health equityAdvocacy, community engagement, and cross-sectoral collaborations are key strategies to COVID-19 response (11).
B. For subsequent action
 Investigate the vaccines' long-term safety, seroconversion, and seroprotection rates in older adults with cancerPopulations included in phase III randomized controlled trials were mostly younger individuals without comorbidities. “Real-world” evidence can further support the effectiveness COVID-19 vaccines among other populations such as older adults and patients with cancer.
 Prioritize investigations on the impact of aging, reduction in physical activities, function, frailty, and anticancer treatments on vaccine efficacy and adverse effects
  5 in total

1.  Updated International Society of Geriatric Oncology COVID-19 working group recommendations on COVID-19 vaccination among older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Anna Rachelle Mislang; Celia Gabriela Hernández-Favela; Chiara Russo; Giuseppe Colloca; Grant R Williams; Shane O'Hanlon; Lisa Cooper; Anita O'Donovan; Riccardo A Audisio; Kwok-Leung Cheung; Regina Gironés-Sarrió; Reinhard Stauder; Michael Jaklitsch; Clarito Cairo; Luiz Antonio Gil; Mahmood Alam; Schroder Sattar; Kumud Kantilal; Kah Poh Loh; Stuart M Lichtman; Etienne Brain; Hans Wildiers; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Multi-Level Governance of COVID-19 Pandemic and the Solitude Within Geriatric Oncology.

Authors:  Vasco Lourenço Fonseca; Joaquim Croca Caeiro; Rui Miranda Juliao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Elucidating the effect of geriatric parameters on COVID-19 outcomes for older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Martine Milton; Joanne Jethwa; Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2022-02-14

4.  Serological response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer older than 80 years.

Authors:  Daniela Iacono; Linda Cerbone; Lucia Palombi; Elena Cavalieri; Isabella Sperduti; Rosario Andrea Cocchiara; Bruno Mariani; Gabriella Parisi; Carlo Garufi
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance for Patients with Cancer in Mexico: Report From the Working Group of the Mexican Society of Oncology.

Authors:  Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Oscar Arrieta; Enrique Bargalló-Rocha; Saúl Campos-Gómez; Yanin Chavarri-Guerra; Jessica Chávez-Nogueda; Fernanda González-Lara; Fernando Pérez-Jacobo; Héctor Martínez-Said
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.323

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.