Literature DB >> 33715860

Global economic costs of aquatic invasive alien species.

Ross N Cuthbert1, Zarah Pattison2, Nigel G Taylor3, Laura Verbrugge4, Christophe Diagne5, Danish A Ahmed6, Boris Leroy7, Elena Angulo5, Elizabeta Briski8, César Capinha9, Jane A Catford10, Tatenda Dalu11, Franz Essl12, Rodolphe E Gozlan13, Phillip J Haubrock14, Melina Kourantidou15, Andrew M Kramer16, David Renault17, Ryan J Wasserman18, Franck Courchamp5.   

Abstract

Much research effort has been invested in understanding ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) across ecosystems and taxonomic groups, but empirical studies about economic effects lack synthesis. Using a comprehensive global database, we determine patterns and trends in economic costs of aquatic IAS by examining: (i) the distribution of these costs across taxa, geographic regions and cost types; (ii) the temporal dynamics of global costs; and (iii) knowledge gaps, especially compared to terrestrial IAS. Based on the costs recorded from the existing literature, the global cost of aquatic IAS conservatively summed to US$345 billion, with the majority attributed to invertebrates (62%), followed by vertebrates (28%), then plants (6%). The largest costs were reported in North America (48%) and Asia (13%), and were principally a result of resource damages (74%); only 6% of recorded costs were from management. The magnitude and number of reported costs were highest in the United States of America and for semi-aquatic taxa. Many countries and known aquatic alien species had no reported costs, especially in Africa and Asia. Accordingly, a network analysis revealed limited connectivity among countries, indicating disparate cost reporting. Aquatic IAS costs have increased in recent decades by several orders of magnitude, reaching at least US$23 billion in 2020. Costs are likely considerably underrepresented compared to terrestrial IAS; only 5% of reported costs were from aquatic species, despite 26% of known invaders being aquatic. Additionally, only 1% of aquatic invasion costs were from marine species. Costs of aquatic IAS are thus substantial, but likely underreported. Costs have increased over time and are expected to continue rising with future invasions. We urge increased and improved cost reporting by managers, practitioners and researchers to reduce knowledge gaps. Few costs are proactive investments; increased management spending is urgently needed to prevent and limit current and future aquatic IAS damages.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Brackish; Freshwater; Habitat biases; InvaCost; Marine; Monetary impact

Year:  2021        PMID: 33715860     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Genetic structure of American bullfrog populations in Brazil.

Authors:  Gabriel Jorgewich-Cohen; Luís Felipe Toledo; Taran Grant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Global economic costs of herpetofauna invasions.

Authors:  Ismael Soto; Ross N Cuthbert; Antonín Kouba; César Capinha; Anna Turbelin; Emma J Hudgins; Christophe Diagne; Franck Courchamp; Phillip J Haubrock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Scavenger guild and consumption patterns of an invasive alien fish species in a Mediterranean wetland.

Authors:  Adrian Orihuela-Torres; Juan Manuel Pérez-García; José Antonio Sánchez-Zapata; Francisco Botella; Esther Sebastián-González
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Building a synthesis of economic costs of biological invasions in New Zealand.

Authors:  Thomas W Bodey; Zachary T Carter; Phillip J Haubrock; Ross N Cuthbert; Melissa J Welsh; Christophe Diagne; Franck Courchamp
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.061

5.  Do alternative resources dampen functional responses of native but not alien gammarids?

Authors:  Ross N Cuthbert; Syrmalenia G Kotronaki; Jasmin C Hütt; Elisabeth Renk; Niklas Warlo; Elizabeta Briski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Functional traits underlying performance variations in the overwintering of the cosmopolitan invasive plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) under climate warming and water drawdown.

Authors:  Xiaolong Huang; Fan Ke; Qisheng Li; Yu Zhao; Baohua Guan; Kuanyi Li
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Abiotic and biotic correlates of the occurrence, extent and cover of invasive aquatic Elodea nuttallii.

Authors:  Kate Crane; Louise Kregting; Neil E Coughlan; Ross N Cuthbert; Anthony Ricciardi; Hugh J MacIsaac; Jaimie T A Dick; Neil Reid
Journal:  Freshw Biol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.538

8.  Exotic fishes that are phylogenetically close but functionally distant to native fishes are more likely to establish.

Authors:  Meng Xu; Shao-Peng Li; Jaimie T A Dick; Dangen Gu; Miao Fang; Yexin Yang; Yinchang Hu; Xidong Mu
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 13.211

9.  Survival, Growth, and Reproduction: Comparison of Marbled Crayfish with Four Prominent Crayfish Invaders.

Authors:  Antonín Kouba; Boris Lipták; Jan Kubec; Martin Bláha; Lukáš Veselý; Phillip J Haubrock; Francisco J Oficialdegui; Hamid Niksirat; Jiří Patoka; Miloš Buřič
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10

10.  Breathing space: deoxygenation of aquatic environments can drive differential ecological impacts across biological invasion stages.

Authors:  James W E Dickey; Neil E Coughlan; Jaimie T A Dick; Vincent Médoc; Monica McCard; Peter R Leavitt; Gérard Lacroix; Sarah Fiorini; Alexis Millot; Ross N Cuthbert
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.133

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.