Cristian Rosso1, Giacomo Filippini1, Alejandro Criado2, Michele Melchionna1, Paolo Fornasiero1,3, Maurizio Prato1,2,4. 1. Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, CENMAT, Center of Excellence for Nanostructured Materials, INSTM, UdR Trieste, University of Trieste, Via Licio Giorgieri 1, Trieste 34127, Italy. 2. Center for Cooperative Research in Biomaterials (CIC biomaGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Paseo de Miramón 182, 20014 Donostia San Sebastián, Spain. 3. ICCOM-CNR Trieste Research Unit, University of Trieste, Trieste 34127, Italy. 4. Basque Foundation for Science, Ikerbasque, Bilbao 48013, Spain.
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) nanostructures are a frontier in materials chemistry as a result of their extraordinary properties. Metal-free 2D nanomaterials possess extra appeal due to their improved cost-effectiveness and lower toxicity with respect to many inorganic structures. The outstanding electronic characteristics of some metal-free 2D semiconductors have projected them into the world of organic synthesis, where they can function as high-performance photocatalysts to drive the sustainable synthesis of high-value organic molecules. Recent reports on this topic have inspired a stream of research and opened up a theme that we believe will become one of the most dominant trends in the forthcoming years.
Two-dimensional (2D) nanostructures are a frontier in materials chemistry as a result of their extraordinary properties. Metal-free 2D nanomaterials possess extra appeal due to their improved cost-effectiveness and lower toxicity with respect to many inorganic structures. The outstanding electroniccharacteristics of some metal-free 2Dsemiconductors have projected them into the world of organic synthesis, where they can function as high-performance photocatalysts to drive the sustainable synthesis of high-value organic molecules. Recent reports on this topic have inspired a stream of research and opened up a theme that we believe will become one of the most dominant trends in the forthcoming years.
Although research on two-dimensional
(2D) materials traces back several decades, its renaissance can be
pinpointed to when single-layer graphene was isolated and characterized
by Geim and Novoselov, who were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics
for their discoveries.[1,2] Since then, graphene’s
incredible properties have inspired many researchers investigating
a wide range of possible applications. The recognition that such distinct
properties go hand in hand with the 2D arrangement motivated and accelerated
the exploration of other 2D materials, which include both metal-based
and metal-free materials. In recent years, research on 2Dmetal-free
materials has become increasingly broad because of the lower materials
cost of metal-free materials, as compared to that of metal-based structures.
Among the various applications for such materials, photocatalysis
is an exceptionally attractive field, fitting most of the aspects
of the “green chemistry” modern philosophy, where integrating
sustainability criteria into chemical production is the core mission.
In this context, exploiting the energy of solar light to trigger chemical
transformations in lieu of more energy-intensive and less ecological
production schemes represents a big step forward toward sustainability.[3,4] Despite the promising findings and the high expectations for the
use of 2Dmetal-free materials as photocatalysts for organic transformations,
the full potential of these intriguing structures has yet to be uncovered,
and understanding the structure/activity relationship still requires
a great deal of investigation. In this Perspective, we identify the
critical points of 2Dmetal-free materials and discuss their success
as photocatalysts for advanced organic synthesis. We also offer critical
discussion on the areas to be improved to extend applicability and
increase industrial appeal. Finally, we present emerging trends in
2D materials photocatalysis leading toward richer organic synthesis.
Types
of Two-Dimensional Materials
Although different classes of
2D materials exist, 2D materials
are often described as layered solids with a high in-plane bond strength
but weak interplanar interactions, typically deriving from van der
Waals forces.[5] The layered structure can
be exfoliated into thinner, few-layer structures with relative ease.[6−8] A more stringent definition of 2D materials is restricted to those
featuring single-atom-thick layers, whereby the resemblance with relativistic
Dirac particles makes them unique.[9] In
contrast with monolayered 2D species, few-layered 2D materials are
more accessible and versatile, explaining their popularity from an
application-focused point of view. The flexibility in defining 2D
materials has led to a “gray area”, where the arrangement
of chemical species organized in sheets has been taken as an indicator
to claim the 2D nature, even when multilayered structures are the
subject of the reported study. It is important to keep in mind that
the two situations (thin, few-layered vs multilayered
bulk solids) usually generate dramaticchanges in the material properties.
Why
Focus on Two-Dimensional Structures for Photocatalysis?
The
properties of 2D photocatalysts match some photocatalysis requirements
well. The planar sizes in 2D materials can reach the micron scale,
with concomitant enhancement of the specific surface area.[10] In addition, thicknesses can be reduced to a
few nanometers, or even, in some cases, to monatomicsizes, using
modern synthetic approaches.[11] These geometric
features are notably correlated with quantum and dielectricconfinement
effects, which modify the band structure and, consequently, the band
gap.[12] Typically, the band gap widens due
to quantum confinement, and upshifts of the conduction band (CB) are
observed, enhancing both the potential energy of the photogenerated
electrons and their reduction ability.[13] The 2D geometry also improves the separation and migration of the
charge carriers, which are prerequisites for efficient photocatalysis,
and higher densities of surface active sites. Moreover, the chemical
and morphological structures can be locally modified, enabling tunability
of the defect density.[14,15] It is also possible to adjust
the electronic states by doping the lattice with various elements,
either metals or nonmetals. Although doping is a versatile approach
that has also been adopted for bulk catalytic materials, this strategy
notably benefits from the 2D arrangement for reaching (i) higher per-mass
relative dopant concentrations and (ii) superior control over the
dopant environment. The former aspect capitalizes on the easier diffusion
of the dopant through a thinner structure (as compared to bulk materials),
whereas the latter benefits from the usually higher homogeneity of
2D layered materials.[15] Finally, great
opportunities arise from creating interfaced 2D structures by combining
two different phases. This combination results in the creation of
heterojunctions (p–n) or Z-schemes, which
are two of the most modern approaches for achieving significant enhancement
of catalytic performance.[16] Metal-free
interfaces are also a rapidly emerging field, with 2D hybrid structures
offering various advantages.[17] It is evident
that the effectiveness of the interface is maximized in 2D structures
for geometric reasons, which also enables the construction of devices
with higher mechanical flexibilities (Figure ).[18]
Figure 1
Graphical representation
of the foreseen major avenues to organic
photocatalysis by metal-free two-dimensional (2D) materials.
Graphical representation
of the foreseen major avenues to organic
photocatalysis by metal-free two-dimensional (2D) materials.Although metal-free 2D materials can be based on
several elements
including Si, Se, P, S, B, or Te, carbon has been investigated the
most for the design and synthesis of photocatalysts. Carbon has been
preferred to date because of its easy availability and the rich arsenal
of available morphologies of carbon materials, particularly at the
nanoscale, which enables tailoring of the physicochemical and electronic
properties.[19] For instance, these properties
can be tuned by simple chemical modification of graphene via introduction of functional groups or dopants.[20−25] Apart from carbon, other nonmetal2D materials with semiconducting
properties that have emerged include hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN)
and black phosphorus (BP), although their use has thus far mainly
involved energy-related catalysis.[26−28] A key issue when reporting
metal-free catalysts is to ascertain that no adventitious metal impurities
are incorporated within the material, as even at low parts per million
(ppm) levels metals can affect the performance, thus generating falseconclusions and reproducibility problems.[29]
Two-Dimensional Metal-Free Photocatalysts: Protagonists, Minor
Characters, and Rising Stars
Among 2D structures (Figure ), the carbon nitrides
(CNs) represent the most popular choice
for photocatalytic applications, including organic transformations,
because of their visible-light absorption, facile synthesis, stability,
and versatility for structural modifications.[30−32]
Figure 2
Typical band edge potentials
of the two-dimensional metal-free
semiconductors graphitic-CN (g-CN), poly(heptazine imides) (PHI-CN),
mesoporous carbon nitride (mpg-CN), hexagonal boron carbon nitride
(h-BCN), and two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks (2D-COFs)
discussed herein.
Typical band edge potentials
of the two-dimensional metal-free
semiconductors graphitic-CN (g-CN), poly(heptazine imides) (PHI-CN),
mesoporous carbon nitride (mpg-CN), hexagonal boron carbon nitride
(h-BCN), and two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks (2D-COFs)
discussed herein.Carbon-nitride-based
materials diversify to large extents, and
various structures have been reported, building a portfolio of material
subclasses. From a structural point of view, the most stable and most
frequently investigated allotrope, namely, graphitic-CN (g-CN), is
proposed to be constituted by repeating N-bridged poly(tri-s-triazine) frameworks arranged into graphite-like π-conjugated
planar layers (although other repeating units have been proposed,
such as, for example, s-triazine).[33,34] The C/N ratio in g-CN is theoretically 3/4 (as indicated by the
typically used formula, C3N4); however, the
experimental ratio deviates from this value depending on the synthetic
procedure due to the formation of defective structures and incorporation
of other elements (e.g., O). The accurate structure
of g-CN (and other CNs in general) has not been defined in detail,
and often the depiction of the structure is merely a simplification
for guiding the reader. Becauseconventional preparation protocols
(which are also the simplest ones) based on pyrolysis of solid precursors
do not enable easy control on the final structure, detailed knowledge
of the entire structure is not accessible in most cases. This lack
of knowledge poses an extra challenge for theoretical studies on CNcatalysts, as the observed activity may rely on definite structural
features (defects, specific moieties, or others) that could be overlooked
during computational analyses, thus generating erroneous conclusions.
To mitigate this problem, diligent and in-depth characterization of
the materials should become a routine part of the work, even when
materials syntheses are replicated from previously published articles,
because marginal differences in conditions may lead to alterations
of the final structures. Fortunately, rapid progress is being made,
leading to next generations of materials with improved performance
and better-defined structures.[35] The position
of both valence and conduction bands (VB and CB, respectively) can
be modulated on the basis of the C/N ratio, polymerization degree,
crystallinity, and the presence of doping agents (e.g., boron, sulfur, phosphorus, organic additives).[30,34,36] The textural properties can also be tailored
for better photocatalytic performance, as shown by the development
of mesoporous carbon nitride (mpg-CN), which possesses surface areas
much higher than those of g-CN.[37,38] Indeed, mpg-CN has
recently emerged in organic reactions for the synthetically relevant
functionalization of arenes and heteroarenes (Figure ).[39]
Figure 3
(a) Mesoporous
carbon nitride (mpg-CN) preparation
from cyanamide through thermal treatment. (b) mpg-CN application in
C–H bifunctionalization of arenes and heteroarenes. (c) mpg-CN
application in C–H functionalization of arenes using alkali
metal salts. (d) mpg-CN application in C–N cross-coupling reactions.
DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide.
(a) Mesoporouscarbon nitride (mpg-CN) preparation
from cyanamide through thermal treatment. (b) mpg-CN application in
C–H bifunctionalization of arenes and heteroarenes. (c) mpg-CN
application in C–H functionalization of arenes using alkali
metal salts. (d) mpg-CN application in C–N cross-coupling reactions.
DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide.Although CN materials are conventionally prepared as bulk, appropriate
protocols for 2D structures have been proposed. For example, Zhao
and Antonietti showed that, starting from melamine and cyanuric acid,
a g-CNconsisting of thin, multisheet structures
(thicknesses in the range of 15–20 nm) could be prepared. This
catalyst effectively promoted a photocatalyzed Diels–Alder
reactions under visible light irradiation,[40] being one of the milestones in 2DCN-based photocatalytic organic
synthesis (Figure ).
Figure 4
(a) Graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN) preparation from melamine and
cyanuric acid through pyrolysis. (b) g-CN application in photocatalyzed
Diels–Alder reactions. LED: light-emitting diode.
(a) Graphiticcarbon nitride (g-CN) preparation from melamine and
cyanuric acid through pyrolysis. (b) g-CN application in photocatalyzed
Diels–Alder reactions. LED: light-emitting diode.Understanding the textural properties of this material could
have
provided additional information related to activity, and we propose
that future studies should carefully consider the contributions of
surface area and pore size distributions.[41] A similar g-CN prepared by pyrolysis of guanidine was employed to
carry out photo-oxidative additions of aminoalkyl radical precursors
to unsaturated acceptors.[42] Researchers
have demonstrated that exfoliation of CN bulk materials into thin
2D nanosheets is one main contributing factors to the much enhanced
photocatalytic activity, as a result of the increased active site
density.[43,44] GraphiticCN in its pristine form generally
exhibits moderatecatalytic activity because of the sluggish conductivity
and low surface area. A great deal of research has focused on strategies
to modify the pristine material in order to boost the resulting photocatalytic
activity.[35] In this direction, our group
recently investigated how postsynthetic modifications of g-CNcan
influence the outcome of a photocatalytic process, namely, perfluoroalkylation
reactions of electron-rich organic molecules (Figure ).[45]
Figure 5
(a) Carbon
nitride (CN) preparation from melamine and related postsynthetic
modifications. (b) CN applications in photocatalyzed perfluoroalkylation
reactions.
(a) Carbon
nitride (CN) preparation from melamine and related postsynthetic
modifications. (b) CN applications in photocatalyzed perfluoroalkylation
reactions.Important insights into the mechanistic
features were gathered
by advanced 19F nuclear magnetic resonance techniques,
revealing the criticality of the fluorinated substrate’s affinity
toward the CN surface. In our opinion, studies that couple the screening
of new organic reactions with investigations (theoretical and experimental)
on the related mechanism could considerably accelerate the development
of 2D photocatalysts toward industrial feasibility.One subclass
of CN that is flourishing in photocatalytic applications
are poly(heptazine imides) (PHI-CN). These materials are conventionally
prepared by eutectic molten salts methods, giving rise to a nanometer-size
layered structure with continuous channels. The synthesis generates
some negatively charged N sites, which bind the cation of the employed
metal salt (usually K+ or Na+).[46] Although most of the CN photocatalysts have always been
linked to electron-transfer processes, PHI-CN is also capable of driving
energy-transfer reactions. This ability can translate into the generation
of excited-state molecules other than charged radicals, paving the
way for new reactivities.[47−51] Moreover, PHI-CN materials offer another interesting opportunity
in that the alkaline metals could be replaced by other transition
metals through cation exchange strategies, thus potentially leading
to CN–single atom materials.[52]Although they have been
less investigated to date, boroncarbon
nitrides (BCNs) also offer interesting potential applications. BoronCNs are ternary-component materials made of carbon, nitrogen, and
boron that can be formed with cubic (c-BCN) or hexagonal (h-BCN) crystal
structures. In particular, h-BCN synthesis resulted from interest
in combining graphene with hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) to amend
the 0 band gap of graphene (G) and the wide band gap of h-BN (typically
above 5 eV) simultaneously. As theoretical studies have confirmed,[53] the resulting material (h-BCN) shows an intermediate
optical behavior with absorption energy that can be adjusted in the
visible range (e.g., by varying the BCN stoichiometry),[54] with the possibility of forming segregated domains
of one of the three elements (typically C).[55,56] As a result, h-BCN is an appealing option for photocatalytic applications,[57] and, apart from water splitting evolution and
CO2 reduction,[56,57] h-BCN has recently
attracted attention as a catalyst for synthetically relevant photoredox
reactions.[58,59] König, Wang, and co-workers
studied the photochemical C–H functionalization of electron-rich
arenescatalyzed by an h-BCN with notable activity,[60] whereas other photo-oxidation and photoreduction reactions
were possible by simply tuning the relative content of the h-BCN precursors
(typically glucose and boric acid, Figure ).[61−63] Despite the above-mentioned encouraging
case studies, organic photocatalysis by BCN is still in its infancy;
therefore, there is fertile soil for future developments.
Figure 6
(a) Hexagonal
boron carbon nitride (h-BCN) preparation from urea,
boric acid, and glucose through calcination. (b) h-BCN application
in photocatalyzed C–H functionalization of arenes. DG: directing
group.
(a) Hexagonal
boron carbon nitride (h-BCN) preparation from urea,
boric acid, and glucose through calcination. (b) h-BCN application
in photocatalyzed C–H functionalization of arenes. DG: directing
group.Finally, covalent organic frameworks
(COFs) are a popular class
of single-phase2Dmetal-free candidates for photocatalytic organic
synthesis. Covalent organic frameworks are covalent, porous crystalline
polymers that enable the integration of organic motifs into an ordered
structure.[64,65] The better-defined structures
of COFs, as compared to those of CN or BCN, make this class of materials
distinctive. In particular, 2D-COFs possess extended π-conjugated
frameworks and eclipsed stacked sheets with regularly aligned columns,
where the ordered columns in 2D-COFs provide ideal channels for charge
carrier transport in the stacking direction.[66] In addition, despite their heterogeneity, the controlled, high porosity
of 2D-COFs ensures great accessibility to active sites, offering excellent
catalytic performance and the potential for higher reaction selectivity
by means of pore size tailoring.[65,67] Thus, 2D-COFs
could lead to the development of photoactive materials for optoelectronics,
photovoltaics, and visible light photocatalysis.[67−70] For COFs, the 2D versus 3D distinction is easier to define because it evolves from the simplified
symmetry of the specific building blocks used to construct the framework.[64] In general, 2D-COFs exhibit a richer topology
than other 2D materials (i.e., hexagonal or tetragonal
geometries of different sizes), leading to increasing interest in
the development of synthetic strategies for the next generation of
materials.[71] For catalytic applications,
there are additional opportunities for introducing organic groups
within specificchannel positions, endowing COFs with enhanced functionality.[72] Wang and co-workers illustrated the photochemical
oxidation of boronic acids using three different 2D-COFs having different
shapes and channel dimensions (hexagonal or rhombic repetitive units
with dimensions of 1.4–2.8 nm).[73] Recently, Yang and co-workers envisaged the use of a hydrazone-based
2D-COF with a hexagonal pore system with dimensions of 2.2 nm for
carrying out photochemical alkylation of N-heterocyclic compounds
(Figure ).[74] In addition to these examples, many other photocatalytic
procedures have been reported, some of which deal with photo-oxidation
reactions of simple organic substrates such as alcohols, amines, and
sulfides.[75−77] Nevertheless, more complex reactions such as photodehalogenations,
cross-couplings, and cyclizations have demonstrated and proven the
great versatility of 2D-COFs.[78−82] Therefore, we expect rapid proliferation of more challenging organic
transformations by 2D-COF photocatalysts.
Figure 7
(a) Two-dimensional covalent-organic
framework (2D-COF) preparation
from 2,5-dimethoxyterephthalohydrazide and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene
through solvothermal treatment. (b) 2D-COF application in photocatalyzed
alkylation of N-heterocyclic compounds.
(a) Two-dimensional covalent-organic
framework (2D-COF) preparation
from 2,5-dimethoxyterephthalohydrazide and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene
through solvothermal treatment. (b) 2D-COF application in photocatalyzed
alkylation of N-heterocyclic compounds.
Emerging
Directions and Vision for the Future
Despite the great progress
in photocatalytic organic synthesis
by metal-free 2Dsingle-phasecatalysts, the parallelism with 2D inorganic
hybrids, which, through creation of suitable heterojunctions, can
remarkably enhance photocatalytic performance, has naturally provided
a new direction for metal-free analogues. Specifically, one frontier
is combining two metal-free phases and suitably interfacing them,
thus preparing 2Dmetal-free nanohybrids to combine their catalytic
behavior while exploiting the resulting new features. One objective
is to replicate the well-known inorganic Z-schemes
by relying on only nonmetal2D structures. This method retards electron–hole
recombination rates while exploiting the higher CB energy level and
the lower VB energy level to enable coupled energetically demanding
redox processes (Figure ).[83]
Figure 8
Graphical sketch of a Z-scheme and its function.
Two semiconductors (SCs) opportunely interfaced and with staggered
band configuration (and suitable band Fermi levels and work functions)
give rise to band bending. The built-in internal electric field and
the band bending cause coupling of the photogenerated holes and electrons
of SC1 and SC2, respectively, whereas the electrons and holes in SC1
and SC2 are maintained and spatially separated, able to function for
reduction and oxidation reactions.
Graphical sketch of a Z-scheme and its function.
Two semiconductors (SCs) opportunely interfaced and with staggered
band configuration (and suitable band Fermi levels and work functions)
give rise to band bending. The built-in internal electric field and
the band bending causecoupling of the photogenerated holes and electrons
of SC1 and SC2, respectively, whereas the electrons and holes in SC1
and SC2 are maintained and spatially separated, able to function for
reduction and oxidation reactions.The synergism in 2Dmetal-free nanohybrids for photocatalysis has
thus far been confined to energy-related processes. A notable achievement
was reported by He et al., who prepared a 2DCN/h-BN
nanohybrid by the direct growth of CN on h-BN nanosheets, which they
successfully used for photocatalyticH2 and H2O2 synthesis. Enhanced activity originated from the suitable
interfacial domain between CN and h-BN, causing physical separation
of the charge carriers and prolonging their lifetime, although, in
this case, the potential energy of the photoexcited electrons was
reduced following the CN to h-BN injection.[84] Two-dimensional BP/CNcatalytic heterostructure for H2 evolution is another remarkable example of interfacial synergism,
whereby charge transfer inhibited charge recombination, making catalysis
possible, even under infrared irradiation.[85] Other interesting examples with graphene/CN and BP/covalent triazine frameworks used for water splitting or decontamination
of organic pollutants indicate the great potential of this type of
heterostructure.[17,86,87] We anticipate that their use in photocatalytic organic synthesis
will soon take off, making the synthesis of high-value organiccompounds
with good solar-to-chemical efficiency possible. A thorough evaluation
of the band structures and Fermi levels of the two phases will be
critical to establish truly cooperative mechanisms, possibly by means
of the Z-scheme configuration, and synthetic efforts
must look at the phaseconnection, maximizing interfacial domains
with strong interactions.Another recent trend that we expect to flourish in the near future
is coupling 2Dmetal-free materials with metalcomplexes. The concept
is to make use of transition metalcomplexes for combining photocatalysis
with conventional organiccatalysis. More specifically, the photocatalyst
is intended to serve as a single-electron-transfer (SET) shuttle to
harness the metalcomplex with specific oxidation states and the coordination
environment to perform the tasks required by the mechanism. Although
not purely metal-free overall, this strategy still builds on the ability
of metal-free materials to absorb light, to generate the separated
excited charges, and to transfer the charges. Pioneering work by Durrant,
Reisner, and co-workers coupled CN photocatalysts with Ni diphospinecomplexes to achieve the dual function of H2 solar generation
and the simultaneous oxidation of benzyl alcohol.[88] This work also inspires studies of more challenging purely
organic reactions. Pieber and co-workers exploited this metal/OA-CN
(oxamide-based carbon nitride) dual mechanism to enable a variety
of organic reactions such as esterifications, (thio)etherifications,
and aminations under white light irradiation (Figure ),[89−92] while Ghosh et al. used dual catalysis
by Ni derivatives and mpg-CN to drive coupling of aryl halides with
aliphatic/aromaticamines and sulfamides (Figure ).[39]
Figure 9
(a) OA-CN (oxamide-based
carbon nitride) preparation from urea
and oxamide through calcination. (b) OA-CN application in photocatalyzed
esterification, (thio)etherification, and amination reactions by means
of dual nickel/photocatalysis.
(a) OA-CN (oxamide-based
carbon nitride) preparation from urea
and oxamide through calcination. (b) OA-CN application in photocatalyzed
esterification, (thio)etherification, and amination reactions by means
of dual nickel/photocatalysis.Such examples are quite recent and exclusively include CN as the
2D photocatalyst. The key mechanistic aspects are not yet well understood
and require further exploration, but it is likely that the specific
steps will differentiate according to the type of reaction and catalytic
system.[93] Nevertheless, these examples
highlight the immense potential for organic synthesis, possibly encompassing
a wide range of reactivity. Future developments will depend on the
study and definition of the main features of the catalyticcycle for
each class of investigated reactions, such as, for example, the dynamics
of the SET steps (whether it is a direct transfer, a second coordination
sphere transfer, or a solvent-mediated transfer) and the nature of
the metal active site.To sum up, several examples of non-metal-based
2D materials beyond
graphene have all the qualifications to satisfy the strict requirements
of photocatalysis. Thus far, a great effort has focused on their use
as components in hybrid catalytic systems, with widespread use in
energy-related photocatalysis. However, photocatalytic organic synthesis
is experiencing a great deal of attention, and we expect that it will
take a central role for future applications of this class of materials.
Future avenues of development of 2Dmetal-free catalysts will converge
toward (i) the ability to control and to modify the structure by synthetic
schemes; (ii) the appropriate advanced characterization tools and
methods required to reveal the substructure/functionality relationships
in photocatalysis; (iii) nonreliance on high metal loadings (i.e., exploring possible introduction of low fractions of
single metal atoms); and (iv) the possibility of interfacing different
2D nonmetal phases with suitable contacts and interactions, both to
extend the possible applicability to more demanding classes of reactions
and to improve photocatalytic activity. More complex catalytic systems,
such as the inclusion of metal species for performing traditional
organic steps also represent an attractive opportunity, driving organic
transformations of higher complexity.
Authors: L Britnell; R M Ribeiro; A Eckmann; R Jalil; B D Belle; A Mishchenko; Y-J Kim; R V Gorbachev; T Georgiou; S V Morozov; A N Grigorenko; A K Geim; C Casiraghi; A H Castro Neto; K S Novoselov Journal: Science Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 47.728