| Literature DB >> 33715150 |
Ekaterina Mikhailova1, Alexandra Semchenkova1, Olga Illarionova1, Svetlana Kashpor1, Varvara Brilliantova1, Elena Zakharova1, Elena Zerkalenkova1, Andrea Zangrando2,3, Natalia Bocharova4, Larisa Shelikhova1, Yulia Diakonova1, Vladimir Zhogov1, Rimma Khismatullina1, Olga Molostova1, Barbara Buldini2, Elena Raykina1, Sergey Larin1, Yulia Olshanskaya1, Natalia Miakova1, Galina Novichkova1, Michael Maschan1, Alexander M Popov1.
Abstract
CD19-directed treatment in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL) frequently leads to the downmodulation of targeted antigens. As multicolour flow cytometry (MFC) application for minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in BCP-ALL is based on B-cell compartment study, CD19 loss could hamper MFC-MRD monitoring after blinatumomab or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. The use of other antigens (CD22, CD10, CD79a, etc.) as B-lineage gating markers allows the identification of CD19-negative leukaemia, but it could also lead to misidentification of normal very-early CD19-negative BCPs as tumour blasts. In the current study, we summarized the results of the investigation of CD19-negative normal BCPs in 106 children with BCP-ALL who underwent CD19 targeting (blinatumomab, n = 64; CAR-T, n = 25; or both, n = 17). It was found that normal CD19-negative BCPs could be found in bone marrow after CD19-directed treatment more frequently than in healthy donors and children with BCP-ALL during chemotherapy or after stem cell transplantation. Analysis of the antigen expression profile revealed that normal CD19-negative BCPs could be mixed up with residual leukaemic blasts, even in bioinformatic analyses of MFC data. The results of our study should help to investigate MFC-MRD more accurately in patients who have undergone CD19-targeted therapy, even in cases with normal CD19-negative BCP expansion.Entities:
Keywords: ALL; CD19 targeting; CD19-negative precursors; flow cytometry; minimal residual disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 33715150 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998