Literature DB >> 3371481

Artificial insemination: a comparison of pregnancy rates with intrauterine versus cervical insemination and washed sperm versus serum swim-up sperm preparations.

R L Urry1, R G Middleton, K Jones, M Poulson, R Worley, W Keye.   

Abstract

A four-cycle artificial insemination protocol was undertaken, with luteinizing hormone (LH) timing, to compare washed sperm and serum swim-up sperm preparations and cervical and intrauterine insemination. Of the 75 patients entered into the protocol series, 63 finished all 4 cycles. During the treatment period, 24 patients became pregnant, 20 of whom were donor (AID) pregnancies (out of 52 patients) and 4 were husband (AIH) pregnancies (out of 11 patients). Seventy-five percent of the pregnancies were intrauterine, whereas only 25% were from cervical inseminations. Sixty-two percent of the pregnancies were due to serum swim-up sperm preparations, and 38% were due to washed sperm preparations. The data indicate substantially higher pregnancy rates can be obtained with intrauterine insemination and suggest that additional studies are necessary to determine if the method of sperm preparation significantly influences pregnancy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3371481     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59957-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment.

Authors:  Petronella Al Kop; Monique H Mochtar; Paul A O'Brien; Fulco Van der Veen; Madelon van Wely
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-25

Review 2.  Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Carolien M Boomsma; Ben J Cohlen; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-15

3.  Comparison of the role of cervical and intrauterine insemination techniques on the incidence of multiple pregnancy after artificial insemination with donor sperm.

Authors:  R Tur; C Buxaderas; F Martínez; A Busquets; B Coroleu; P N Barri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The comparison between Intrauterine Insemination and Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion Using FAST®System in Patients with Unexplained Infertility.

Authors:  Sepideh Peivandi; Aghdas Ebadi; Shila Modanlu
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-07

5.  Ovarian stimulated cycle: not a better alternative for women without ovulation disorder in intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Kemei Zhang; Yinjiao Shi; Ensheng Wang; Li Wang; Qingbo Hu; Yibo Dai; Haiyan Xu; Jiaou Zhang; Ping Jin; Xueqin Chen; Jing Shu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.