Literature DB >> 33714410

One-year clinical outcome of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Insights from KERALA-AF registry.

C G Bahuleyan1, Narayanan Namboodiri2, A Jabir3, Gregory Y H Lip4, George Koshy A5, Babu M Shifas6, Kartik Viswanathan S2, Geevar Zachariah7, K Venugopal8, Eapen Punnose9, K U Natarajan10, G K Mini11, Johny Joseph12, Ashokan Nambiar C13, P B Jayagopal14, P P Mohanan15, Raju George16, Govindan Unni17, C G Sajeev18, Shaffi Muhammed19, N Syam20, Anil Roby21, Rachel Daniel22, V V Krishnakumar6, Anand M Pillai6, Stigi Joseph23, A Jinbert Lordson24.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report patient characteristics, treatment pattern and one-year clinical outcome of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from Kerala, India. This cohort forms part of Kerala Atrial Fibrillation (KERALA-AF) registry which is an ongoing large prospective study.
METHODS: KERALA-AF registry collected data of adults with previously or newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) during April 2016 to April 2017. A total of 3421 patients were recruited from 53 hospitals across Kerala state. We analysed one-year follow-up outcome of 2507 patients with NVAF.
RESULTS: Mean age at recruitment was 67.2 years (range 18-98) and 54.8% were males. Main co-morbidities were hypertension (61.2%), hyperlipidaemia (46.2%) and diabetes mellitus (37.2%). Major co-existing diseases were chronic kidney disease (42.1%), coronary artery disease (41.6%), and chronic heart failure (26.4%). Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.18 (SD ± 1.7) and HAS-BLED score, 1.84 (SD ± 1.3). At baseline, use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) was 38.6% and antiplatelets 32.7%. On one-month follow-up use of OAC increased to 65.8% and antiplatelets to 48.3%. One-year all-cause mortality was 16.48 and hospitalization 20.65 per 100 person years. The main causes of death were cardiovascular (75.0%), stroke (13.1%) and others (11.9%). The major causes of hospitalizations were acute coronary syndrome (35.0%), followed by arrhythmia (29.5%) and heart failure (8.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite high risk profile of patients in this registry, use of OAC was suboptimal, whereas antiplatelets were used in nearly half of patients. A relatively high rate of annual mortality and hospitalization was observed in patients with NVAF in Kerala AF Registry.
Copyright © 2020 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AF Registry; Cardiac arrhythmia; Kerala; Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33714410      PMCID: PMC7961260          DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Heart J        ISSN: 0019-4832


Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the common cardiac arrhythmia seen in clinical practice, associated with high morbidity and mortality. AF is becoming a major public health problem worldwide, leading to increased health care resource utilization with its impact on global health budget., Epidemiological data on AF is available mainly from North America, Europe and Far East.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Significant difference exists between developed and developing countries on aetiology, co-morbid conditions, treatment preferences, mortality and morbidity due to AF., Even though effective therapies have evolved in the last 4 decades and newer drugs were introduced for stroke prevention in AF patients in the last 7–8 years, there is wide variability in adherence to guideline recommended treatment in different regions of the world. Limited information is available on clinical epidemiology, management and outcome of AF patients from south Asia, particularly from India. In this manuscript, we provide patient characteristics, risk factors, treatment pattern and one-year clinical outcome of NVAF patients who were prospectively recruited from 53 hospitals located in both rural and urban areas of Kerala state.

Methods

KERALA-AF registry is an ongoing large prospective cohort registry of AF patients from Kerala. A total of 3421 AF patients were enrolled during the year 2016–17. Patients with transient AF due to causes like acute myocardial infarction, infection, alcohol intoxication, metabolic abnormalities, post-operative cases and critically ill patients with life expectancy less than 30 days were excluded. Each patient was enrolled in the registry after examination by the cardiologist(s) of participating centres from either in-patient or out-patient services. Majority of patients were from out-patient service. Detailed methodology and the baseline findings of the study is published elsewhere. Medical history, physical examination, New York Heart Association (NYHA) status and laboratory investigations including echocardiography were done at baseline. Patients were classified into AF with valvular heart disease (AFVHD) and nonvalvular AF (NVAF)., AFVHD is defined as those cases associated with mitral stenosis, prosthetic valve implantation and mitral valve repair. Findings from clinical examination, chest X-ray and echocardiography were utilized to make diagnosis of valvular heart disease. There were 914 AFVHD patients and 2507 NVAF patients enrolled. Follow up was done at one-month, six months and at one-year. One-month follow-up was exclusively clinic visit and six month and one-year visits were either clinic visit or telephonic contact. Among the total 2507 patients, we could follow up 97.4% at one month, 88.9% at six month and 84.1% at one-year (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Kerala AF Registry NVAF patient’s follow-up

Kerala AF Registry NVAF patient’s follow-up Details of co-morbidities and co-existing diseases were assessed. Treatment details collected included drugs used for rate/rhythm control as well as for stroke prevention. Stroke and bleeding risk of patients were assessed using CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED score., If death occurred, cause of death was noted. Additionally, data on clinical events such as stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), arrhythmia, systemic embolism other than stroke, gastro-intestinal (GI) bleed, intra cranial (IC) bleed and minor bleed were collected. Details of causes of hospitalization were also noted. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was taken as chronic kidney disease (CKD). The study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was taken from each participant and the study was approved by the ethics committees of the collaborating institutions. This study was supported by the Cardiological Society of India, Kerala Chapter (CSI–K). Continuous variables were reported as mean ± SD and/or median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were reported as percentages. Univariate analyses were applied to both continuous and categorical variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Data was entered using Epi Data Entry 3.1 version software and analysed using R software and Microsoft Excel package.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The mean age of study patients was 67.2 years (SD ± 13) (range: 18–98) and 54.8% were males. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.2 (SD ± 1.7) and HAS-BLED score was 1.8 (SD ± 1.2). Most prevalent co-morbidities were hypertension (61.2%), followed by hyperlipidaemia (46.2%) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (37.2%). Major co-existing diseases were CKD (42.1%), coronary artery disease (CAD) (41.6%), and chronic heart failure (CHF) (26.4%). Paroxysmal, persistent and permanent AF were present in 45.6%, 14.9% and 39.4% of patients respectively. Baseline characteristics including NYHA classes were presented in Table 1. DM, Hyperlipidaemia and CAD were significantly higher in males and thyroid disease was more in females.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of NVAF patients by sex.

Baseline CharacteristicsMale (N = 1375) n (%)Female (N = 1132) n (%)Total (N = 2507) n (%)P value
Age (in years)Median (IQR)68(60–76)69 (60–76)68(60–76)0.57
Mean (SD)67.0(13.0)67.3 (13.0)67.2 (13.0)0.59
CHA2DS2-VASc score (Mean ± SD)2.82 ± 1.683.61 ± 1.713.18 ± 1.74<0.05
HAS-BLED score (mean ± SD)1.88 ± 1.291.79 ± 1.271.84 ± 1.290.059
Risk factors
Hypertension839(61.0)695(61.4)1534(61.2)0.869
Diabetes mellitus540(39.3)392(34.6)932(37.2)<0.001
Dyslipidemia665(48.4)494(43.6)1159(46.2)<0.001
Co-existing diseases
Stroke/TIA or Systemic Embolism188(13.7)165(14.6)353(14.1)0.526
Coronary Artery Disease693(50.4)351(31.0)1044(41.6)<0.001
Chronic Heart Failure376(27.3)286(25.3)662(26.4)0.237
Chronic Liver Disease33(2.4)20(1.8)53(2.1)0.329
Respiratory Disease312 (22.7)223(19.7)535(21.3)0.038
Thyroid Disease193(14.0)251(22.2)444(17.7)<0.001
Chronic Kidney Disease541 (51.3)513 (48.7)1054 (42.1)0.073
NYHA
Class I & II1139(82.8)934(82.5)2073(82.6)0.710
Class III & IV232(16.9)198(17.5)430(17.2)
AF Classification
Paroxysmal AF645(47.6)500(44.2)1145(45.6)0.116
Persistent AF213(15.5)161(14.2)374(14.9)
Permanent AF516(37.5)471(41.6)987(39.4)
Baseline characteristics of NVAF patients by sex.

Treatment pattern

Rate and rhythm control drugs

Strategy of rate control was used in 72.8% and rhythm control in 27.2% of patients. Betablocker was the most commonly used rate/rhythm control drug (47.9%), followed by Digoxin (24.8%) and Amiodarone (16.7%) and other anti-arrhythmic drugs (10.6%). At the time of entry into the study, 14 patients had a history of catheter ablation, 115 had pacemaker implantation, three had surgery for AF, eleven had implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and six had left atrial (LA) appendage occlusion.

Oral anticoagulants (OACs)

The most commonly used OAC was Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) 58.2% . Patients receiving OAC showed an increase from 38.6% at the time of recruitment to 65.8% at one-month follow-up, and the use of NOAC increased from 2.7% to 7.6%. Among 2064 (82.3%) patients who had CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2, the use of OAC was 39.2% which was increased to 67.8% at one-month follow-up. Patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≤1 also received OAC at baseline (37.9%), which was increased to 55.7% at one-month follow-up (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Although 58.2% of patients were receiving VKA, International Normalised Ratio (INR) monitoring and dose adjustments were inadequate. Among those who were on VKA treatment 51.0% were aware of their INR values at one-month and 58.6% at six month and 77.3% at one-year.
Fig. 2

Use of antithrombotics at baseline and at 1 month follow-up

Fig. 3

Use of antithrombotics at baseline in relation to CHA2DS2-VASC score

Use of antithrombotics at baseline and at 1 month follow-up Use of antithrombotics at baseline in relation to CHA2DS2-VASC score

Antiplatelets

At baseline, 32.7% of patients were receiving antiplatelets which increased to 48.3% on one-month follow-up (Fig. 2). Among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, 33.2% of patients were treated with antiplatelets which increased to 49.1% at one-month follow-up. In 23.0% of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≤1 and 39.4% of CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4 were on antiplatelets at baseline. Both groups showed an increase in the use of antiplatelets on one-month follow up, 36.1% and 57.1% respectively (Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Use of antithrombotics at 1 month follow-up in relation to CHA2DS2-VASC score

Use of antithrombotics at 1 month follow-up in relation to CHA2DS2-VASC score

One-year clinical outcome: death and hospitalizations

During one-year follow-up, all-cause mortality of 16.48/100 person years was observed. Cardiac death was 12.36/100 person years. Majority of death were cardiac (75.0%), followed by stroke (13.1%) and others (11.9%). Nearly half of the deaths (49%) were for patients with paroxysmal AF followed by permanent AF (35%) and persistent AF (16%). Among the total 431 patients (20.65/100 person years) who required hospitalization, majority were due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS), followed by arrhythmia and heart failure (Table 2).
Table 2

Death and non-fatal Hospitalization at each time point within one-year.

Clinical Events1 Month (N = 2441)1–6 Months (N = 2173)6–12 months (N = 1892)Cumulative 1 Year (/100 person years)
All cause Death55162127344 (16.48)
Cardiac4511895258 (12.36)
Stroke6182145 (2.16)
Others4261141 (1.96)
Non-fatal Hospitalization (n (%))101161169431 (20.65)
Stroke11111739 (1.87)
Transient Ischemic Attack06612 (0.57)
Arrhythmia213967127 (6.08)
Acute Coronary Syndrome287152151 (7.23)
Heart Failure27181762 (3.02)
Systemic Embolism other than stroke0426 (0.28)
Gastro intestinal bleed75416 (0.77)
Intracranial Bleed1102 (0.09)
Minor Bleed66315 (0.72)
Death and non-fatal Hospitalization at each time point within one-year.

Discussion

KERALA-AF Registry is the largest and comprehensive study on AF from India. NVAF constituted the major portion of patients in this cohort unlike the earlier studies from India which reported high prevalence of rheumatic valvular heart disease., The mean age of patients (67.2 years) in this study was similar to the mean age of Indian cohort (65.8 years) of GARFIELD-AF registry. Prevalence of risk factors and co-existing diseases were relatively higher. CAD and risk factors like DM, hyperlipidaemia were higher than the average reported in the Indian as well as non-Indian patients of GLORIA-AF and GARFIELD-AF registries (TATable 3). Prevalence of hypertension, in this cohort was similar to what was reported in many other AF registries.,, CKD was found to be high (42.1%) in our study. A relatively higher prevalence of these life style diseases and cardiovascular risk factors observed in this registry might be a reflection of higher prevalence in general population of Kerala. The influence of coronary risk factors, like DM, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension on the observed higher incidence of ACS in this study requires further evaluation.
Table 3

Risk factors and co-morbidities of published NVAF registries.

KERALA-AF Registry (NVAF) (N = 2507)GARFIELD Registry (NVAF)
GLORIA-AF (NVAF)
India (n = 1388)All (N = 52,014)Asia (n = 3071)Europe (n = 7108)N. America (n = 3403)All (N = 15,092)
Age (mean/median)67(±13)65.8(±12.2)69.7(±11.5)68.0(IQR 60–76)73.0 (IQR 66–79)71.0(IQR 64–79)70.5 (IQR 64–78)
Age ≥ 7530.026.337.228.544.339.639.1
Female (%)45.240.143.843.546.744.845.5
Hypertension (%)61.268.576.369.473.480.574.6
Diabetes mellitus (%)37.236.222.220.221.227.123.1
Hyperlipidemia (%)46.213.641.626.736.561.339.9
Stroke/TIA (%)14.19.111.413.015.612.414.2
Coronary Artery Disease (%)41.628.121.621.916.427.020.3
Chronic Heart Failure (%)26.415.520.627.323.419.724.2
Chronic Kidney Disease (%)42.15.210.317.3
CHA2DS2-VASc score (mean/median)3.2(±1.74)2.9 (±1.5)3.2 (±1.6)3(2–4)3 (2–4)3 (2–4)3.2
HASBLED (mean or Median)1.8(±1.3)1.5(±0.9)1.4(±0.9)1.0(IQR 1–2)1.0(IQR 1–2)1.0(IQR 1–2)1.0(IQR 1–2)
Paroxysmal AF (%)45.616.425.258.146.865.853.4
Persistent AF (%)14.98.515.635.438.929.635.5
Permanent AF (%)39.410.413.25.914.34.611.1
OAC (%)65.835.580.055.290.178.379.9
NOAC (%)7.6647.725.552.452.147.6
VKA (%)58.229.532.331.937.826.232.3
Antiplatelet (%)48.343.312.325.86.014.012.1
No Antithrombotic agents (%)16.021.47.616.93.87.57.8
All cause death/100 person years16.487.84.34
Risk factors and co-morbidities of published NVAF registries. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of patients in this registry was similar to what was reported in the European cohort of GLORIA-AF, GARFIELD-AF and EORP-AF registries and higher than the Indian cohort of GARFIELD-AF registry. The use of OAC at baseline (38.6%) was much lower than what was reported in EORP-AF registry (78.7%). Among patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, those who were not receiving OAC at baseline was 60.8% as compared to 31.9% in the GARFIELD-AF registry. HAS-BLED score in general has not been considered for selection of anti-thrombotic drugs in this cohort. It was observed that OAC usage in patients with HAS_BLED score ≥3, and ≤2 were not significantly different, 68.1% and 63.5% respectively. Neither the bleeding risk nor the associated co-morbidities do not seem to have influenced the use of OACs. Low OAC use reflected its inadequate usage for stroke prevention in NVAF patients in Kerala. Even though the commonly used OAC was VKAs in this registry, its use was suboptimal because of unsatisfactory INR monitoring, dose adjustments and lack of compliance to therapy. The overall use of NOAC among KERALA-AF Registry patients (7.6%) was low, similar to what was reported in Indian Heart Rhythm Society-Atrial Fibrillation (IHRS-AF) registry (4%). In GLORIA-AF Registry, the use of NOAC varied among patients recruited from different countries ranging from 20% in Asia to 52% in North America. Although NOAC is the preferred drug for stroke prevention in AF as per guideline recommendations,, the cost considerations and wide difference in prescription practices among physicians might contribute to lower use of NOACs in Kerala. Use of antiplatelets was 48.3% (single antiplatelet therapy (35.1%) and dual antiplatelet (13.2%) which was high when compared to other studies conducted worldwide.,, GLORIA-AF Registry reported antiplatelet usage as 6.0% in European, 14% in North American and 25% in Asian cohorts. Other Indian studies have also shown high usage of antiplatelets among the population with highest risk of stroke. In the Indian cohort of the Realise-AF Registry, 58% received only antiplatelet therapy for prevention of stroke. In IHRS-AF Registry, 30% of patients received only antiplatelet as stroke prevention treatment. The higher prevalence of CAD in this cohort might have contributed to the increased use of antiplatelets.

Outcome

One-year mortality per 100 person years was 16.48 in KERALA-AF Registry, which was 7.8 for Indian cohort of GARFIELD-AF Registry and 4.3 in Global GARFIELD-AF Registry. IHRS- AF registry reported an annual all cause death of (6.5%). RELY-AF Registry reported 11% death in one-year in patients presenting to emergency department with AF in 47 countries with marked difference between participant countries with 20% in Africa, 17% in South America and 10% in North America, Europe and Australia. In KERALA-AF Registry, majority (75%) of death were due to cardiac causes, similar to what was observed in the Indian cohort of GARFIELD-AF Registry. The rate of hospitalization was 20.65/100 person years and majority were due to cardiac causes. This is relatively higher than previously reported rate of hospitalizations in other registries from India, including IHRS-AF Registry. The increased rate of cardiac death and hospitalization due to ACS is probably indicative of a greater extent of CAD. A detailed evaluation of multimorbidity among these patients is required to clarify this issue.

Limitations

The registry data will not reflect the true incidence or prevalence of NVAF in the population since this is a hospital-based study. For VKA treated patients, other than the three time point INR values, we do not have enough data to comment on INR monitoring and dose adjustments.

Conclusion

High propensity of risk factors like hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, and co-existing diseases like CAD, CKD has been observed among NVAF patients in Kerala AF Registry. Despite high stroke risk, a good proportion of patients were not receiving OAC whereas nearly half were treated with antiplatelets. Though most commonly used anticoagulant was VKAs, INR monitoring and dose adjustment was suboptimal. A comparatively higher rate of annual mortality and hospitalization was observed. The study brings out high-risk characteristics of patients, higher annual mortality and hospitalization, inadequacies of treatment and need for improvement in the care of NVAF patients.

Funding

The work was supported by the - Kerala Chapter through a onetime research grant No. CSI/IEC/2017.

Declaration of competing interest

None to declare.
  27 in total

1.  What are the costs of atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  Carina Blomstrom Lundqvist; Gregory Y H Lip; Paulus Kirchhof
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Atrial fibrillation management: a prospective survey in ESC member countries: the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Robby Nieuwlaat; Alessandro Capucci; A John Camm; S Bertil Olsson; Dietrich Andresen; D Wyn Davies; Stuart Cobbe; Günter Breithardt; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; Martin H Prins; Samuel Lévy; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  How to define valvular atrial fibrillation?

Authors:  Laurent Fauchier; Raphael Philippart; Nicolas Clementy; Thierry Bourguignon; Denis Angoulvant; Fabrice Ivanes; Dominique Babuty; Anne Bernard
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.340

4.  Gulf Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Events (Gulf SAFE): design and baseline characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation in the Arab Middle East.

Authors:  Mohammad Zubaid; Wafa A Rashed; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; Wael Almahmeed; Abdullah Shehab; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Ahmed Alqudaimi; Nidal Asaad; Haitham Amin
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-07

5.  Variations in cause and management of atrial fibrillation in a prospective registry of 15,400 emergency department patients in 46 countries: the RE-LY Atrial Fibrillation Registry.

Authors:  Jonas Oldgren; Jeff S Healey; Michael Ezekowitz; Patrick Commerford; Alvaro Avezum; Prem Pais; Jun Zhu; Petr Jansky; Alben Sigamani; Carlos A Morillo; Lisheng Liu; Albertino Damasceno; Alex Grinvalds; Juliet Nakamya; Paul A Reilly; Katalin Keltai; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Afzal Hussein Yusufali; Eiichi Watanabe; Lars Wallentin; Stuart J Connolly; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Defining nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A quest for clarification.

Authors:  Raphaël P Martins; Vincent Galand; Edouard Colette; Nathalie Behar; Dominique Pavin; Christophe Leclercq; Jean-Claude Daubert; Philippe Mabo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  A D Krahn; J Manfreda; R B Tate; F A Mathewson; T E Cuddy
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Cardiovascular risk profile and management of atrial fibrillation in India: Real world data from RealiseAF survey.

Authors:  C Narasimhan; Jagmohan Singh Verma; A G Ravi Kishore; Balbir Singh; Sameer Dani; Kamaldeep Chawala; Azizul Haque; Aftab Khan; Mohan Nair; Amit Vora; V Rajasekhar; Joy M Thomas; Anoop Gupta; Ajay Naik; V S Prakash; Lisa Naditch; P Gabriel Steg
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-02-28

Review 9.  Atrial fibrillation: the current epidemic.

Authors:  Carlos A Morillo; Amitava Banerjee; Pablo Perel; David Wood; Xavier Jouven
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Kerala Atrial Fibrillation Registry: a prospective observational study on clinical characteristics, treatment pattern and outcome of atrial fibrillation in Kerala, India, cohort profile.

Authors:  Bahuleyan Charantharayil Gopalan; Narayanan Namboodiri; Jabir Abdullakutty; Gregory Yh Lip; Allumootil George Koshy; Venugopal Krishnan Nair; Shifas Babu; Shaffi Muhammed; Jinbert Lordson Azariah; Raju George; Ashokan Nambiar; Unni Govindan; Geevar Zachariah; Natarajan Kumaraswamy; Sajeev Chakanalil Govindan; Syam Natesan; Anil Roby; Krishnakumar Velayudhan Nair; Anand M Pillai; Rachel Daniel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  Age-dependent risk for thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: The Fushimi AF registry.

Authors:  Masahiro Esato; Yoshimori An; Hisashi Ogawa; Hiromichi Wada; Koji Hasegawa; Hikari Tsuji; Mitsuru Abe; Masaharu Akao
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Contemporary survival and anticoagulation of patients with atrial fibrillation: A community based cohort study in China.

Authors:  Yong Wei; Qingye Zeng; Lidong Cai; Xingjie Wang; Bin Wang; Chaoying Shen; Chao Li; Caihong Wang; Yahong Shen; Shunhong Yang; Xiaoyu Wu; Yan Liu; Juan Xu; Xiaofeng Lu; Songwen Chen; Genqing Zhou; Shaowen Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.