Literature DB >> 3371394

The antianginal efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release metoprolol once daily: a comparison with conventional metoprolol tablets twice daily.

K Egstrup1, T Gundersen, R Härkönen, E Karlsson, B Lundgren.   

Abstract

In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study treatment with a new controlled-release (CR) preparation of metoprolol, given once daily, was compared with treatment with conventional metoprolol tablets, given twice daily, in 115 patients with stable effort angina pectoris. The patients were treated with 100 mg/day or 200 mg/day, depending on their previous beta-blocker dose. Antianginal efficacy was estimated by counting the number of anginal attacks, by noting the consumption of nitroglycerin tablets, and by exercise tolerance testing. Adverse effects were recorded by a standardized questionnaire. When all patients were analysed together there were no differences in antianginal efficacy between the two treatment regimens. However, when the group taking 200 mg daily was analysed separately better exercise tolerance was found during metoprolol CR therapy, as measured by onset of chest pain and ST-segment change, compared with conventional metoprolol therapy. The two formulations were well tolerated. When given once daily in a total daily dose of 100 mg, the CR preparation induced less adverse effects than the conventional tablets, 50 mg twice daily. It was concluded that the new metoprolol CR preparation, given once daily, possesses the same antianginal efficacy as conventional metoprolol tablets, given twice daily, and may be better tolerated in patients susceptible to side-effects. The antianginal effect of metoprolol CR, 200 mg/day, may be greater over 24 h than that produced by conventional metoprolol tablets, 100 mg twice daily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3371394     DOI: 10.1007/bf00578412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  8 in total

1.  Metoprolol, nifedipine, and the combination in stable effort angina pectoris.

Authors:  A Uusitalo; M Arstila; E A Bae; R Härkönen; O Keyriläinen; U Rytkönen; P M Schjelderup-Mathiesen; H Wendelin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol or hydrochlorothiazide in patients aged 60 to 75 years. Report from a double-blind international multicenter study.

Authors:  J Wikstrand; G Westergren; G Berglund; D Bracchetti; A Van Couter; C A Feldstein; K S Ming; K Kuramoto; S Landahl; E Meaney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  An eighteen months' study of the clinical response to metoprolol, a selective beta1-receptor blocking agent, in patients with angina pectoris.

Authors:  M B Comerford; E M Besterman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of beta-adrenoreceptor blocking drugs.

Authors:  G Johnsson; C G Regàrdh
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol: a comparison with conventional tablets.

Authors:  A Sandberg; I Blomqvist; U E Jonsson; P Lundborg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Double-blind titrated-dose comparison of metoprolol and propranolol in the treatment of angina pectoris.

Authors:  M H Frick; O Luurila
Journal:  Ann Clin Res       Date:  1976-12

7.  Comparison of metoprolol and verapamil in the treatment of angina pectoris.

Authors:  K Arnman; L Rydén
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Early treatment of unstable angina in the coronary care unit: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled comparison of recurrent ischaemia in patients treated with nifedipine or metoprolol or both. Report of The Holland Interuniversity Nifedipine/Metoprolol Trial (HINT) Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-11
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Functional capacity in healthy volunteers before and following beta-blockade with controlled-release metoprolol.

Authors:  P K Rønnevik; J E Nordrehaug; G von der Lippe
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  CAGS and ACS Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 34: effects of ß-blockers in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Tara M Mastracci; Mary-Anne Aarts; Stephen D Cassivi; Santiago A Garcia; Richard F McLean; Edward O McFalls
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Controlled release metoprolol formulations. A review of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  G L Plosker; S P Clissold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Controlled release metoprolol. Clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  M J Kendall; S R Maxwell; A Sandberg; G Westergren
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management angina. North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30

6.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of conventional and controlled release formulations of metoprolol [correction of motoprolol] in healthy Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Y T Lee; C S Liau; E C Wong; W J Chen; M F Chen; C C Chen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.727

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.