Literature DB >> 3371393

Efficacy and tolerability of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol: a comparison with conventional metoprolol tablets in mild to moderate hypertension.

J J Houtzagers1, J G Smilde, G Creytens, G Westergren.   

Abstract

In a double-blind study with parallel groups 195 hypertensive patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either conventional tablets of metoprolol, 100 mg once daily, or a new controlled-release (CR) formulation of metoprolol, 100 mg once daily. The dose was doubled if the patient's diastolic blood pressure remained greater than or equal to 95 mmHg after six weeks on 100 mg, whereas well-controlled patients continued on 100 mg once daily for a further six-week period. In the metoprolol tablet group the 200 mg dose was administered in the form of Durules. There was a significant reduction from the placebo baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate at 24 h after both six weeks and 12 weeks of active treatment; no significant difference in the mean reduction from baseline between the two groups was demonstrated. However, significantly more patients responded to treatment with metoprolol CR when compared with those patients taking metoprolol tablets. After six weeks of active treatment 61% of the metoprolol CR group and 56% of the conventional metoprolol tablet group had a diastolic blood pressure less than 95 mmHg. After another six weeks the corresponding figures were 83% and 69% respectively. Between week 6 and 12, 36% of patients in the metoprolol CR group and 42% of patients in the conventional metoprolol tablet group were receiving a 200 mg dose. All formulations of metoprolol were well-tolerated. Fewer subjective symptoms were reported during active treatment than during the placebo phase. There were no differences between the groups with regard to changes in laboratory variables from baseline, changes in all combined symptoms, or changes in any one symptom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3371393     DOI: 10.1007/bf00578411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  3 in total

1.  Antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol or hydrochlorothiazide in patients aged 60 to 75 years. Report from a double-blind international multicenter study.

Authors:  J Wikstrand; G Westergren; G Berglund; D Bracchetti; A Van Couter; C A Feldstein; K S Ming; K Kuramoto; S Landahl; E Meaney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol: a comparison with conventional tablets.

Authors:  A Sandberg; I Blomqvist; U E Jonsson; P Lundborg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of controlled-release metoprolol: a comparison with atenolol.

Authors:  I Blomqvist; G Westergren; A Sandberg; U E Jonsson; P Lundborg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D H Peters; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Functional capacity in healthy volunteers before and following beta-blockade with controlled-release metoprolol.

Authors:  P K Rønnevik; J E Nordrehaug; G von der Lippe
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Metoprolol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  A Prakash; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  CNS-related performance and haemodynamics of metoprolol-Oros and propranolol after single and 3 days dosing in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A L van Steveninck; M S Pieters; H C Schoemaker; D D Breimer; A F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  A double-blind comparison of once-daily metoprolol controlled-release and atenolol in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  M F Chen; C Y Yang; W J Chen; C M Lee; C C Wu; C S Liau; Y T Lee
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 6.  Controlled release metoprolol formulations. A review of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  G L Plosker; S P Clissold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Controlled release metoprolol. Clinical pharmacokinetic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  M J Kendall; S R Maxwell; A Sandberg; G Westergren
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of conventional and controlled release formulations of metoprolol [correction of motoprolol] in healthy Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Y T Lee; C S Liau; E C Wong; W J Chen; M F Chen; C C Chen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.727

9.  Health expenditure comparison of extended-release metoprolol succinate and immediate-release metoprolol tartarate.

Authors:  Varun Vaidya; Pranav Patel
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-02-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.