Literature DB >> 33713856

Major adverse clinical events associated with implantation of a leadless intracardiac pacemaker.

Robert G Hauser1, Charles C Gornick2, Raed H Abdelhadi2, Chuen Y Tang2, Susan A Casey2, Jay D Sengupta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leadless intracardiac pacemakers were developed to avoid the complications of transvenous pacing systems. The Medtronic Micra™ transcatheter pacemaker is one such system. We found an unexpected number of major adverse clinical events (MACE) in the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturers and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database associated with Micra implantation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe these MACE and compare them to implant procedure MACE in MAUDE for Medtronic CapSureFix™ active-fixation transvenous pacing leads.
METHODS: During January 2021, we queried the MAUDE database for reports of MACE for Micra pacemakers and CapSureFix leads using the simple search terms "death," "tamponade," and "perforation." Reports from 2016-2020 were included.
RESULTS: The search identified 363 MACE for Micra and 960 MACE for CapSureFix leads, including 96 Micra deaths (26.4%) vs 23 CapSureFix deaths (2.4%) (P <.001); 287 Micra tamponades (79.1%) vs 225 tamponades for CapSureFix (23.4%) (P <.001); and 99 rescue thoracotomies for Micra (27.3%) vs 50 rescue thoracotomies for CapSureFix (5.2%) (P <.001). More Micra patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (21.8% vs 1.1%) and suffered hypotension or shock (22.0% vs 5.8%) than CapSureFix recipients (P <.001). Micra patients were more likely to survive a myocardial perforation or tear if they had surgical repair (P = .014).
CONCLUSION: Micra leadless pacemaker implantation may be complicated by myocardial and vascular perforations and tears that result in cardiac tamponade and death. We estimate the incidence is low (<1%). Rescue surgery to repair perforations may be lifesaving. MACE are significantly less for implantation of CapSureFix transvenous ventricular pacing leads.
Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac pacing; Complications; Lead; Leadless; Perforation; Tamponade; Transcatheter

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33713856     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  6 in total

1.  Perforation of the right atrial appendage during implantation of a leadless pacemaker.

Authors:  Kazuma Date; Tomohiro Murata; Akiko Mano; Mitsuhiro Kawata; Shunei Kyo
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-12-29

2.  Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mikhael F El-Chami; Lindsay Bockstedt; Colleen Longacre; Lucas Higuera; Kurt Stromberg; George Crossley; Robert C Kowal; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Fluoroscopic predictors of acceptable capture threshold during the implantation of the micra transcatheter pacing system.

Authors:  Ikuko Togashi; Toshiaki Sato; Akiko Maeda; Takato Mohri; Yumi Katsume; Mika Tashiro; Yuichi Momose; Noriko Nonoguchi; Kyoko Hoshida; Yosuke Miwa; Akiko Ueda; Kyoko Soejima
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.

Authors:  Jonathan P Piccini; Ryan Cunnane; Jan Steffel; Mikhael F El-Chami; Dwight Reynolds; Paul R Roberts; Kyoko Soejima; Clemens Steinwender; Christophe Garweg; Larry Chinitz; Christopher R Ellis; Kurt Stromberg; Dedra H Fagan; Lluis Mont
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.486

5.  The knowns and unknowns of leadless pacing in 2022.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

6.  Leadless pacemaker perforations: Clinical consequences and related device and user problems.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser; Charles C Gornick; Raed H Abdelhadi; Chuen Y Tang; Melanie Kapphahn-Bergs; Susan A Casey; Brynn K Okeson; Elizabeth A Steele; Jay D Sengupta
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.942

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.