| Literature DB >> 33713594 |
Chloe Rees-Spear1, Luke Muir1, Sarah A Griffith1, Judith Heaney2, Yoann Aldon3, Jonne L Snitselaar3, Peter Thomas1, Carl Graham4, Jeffrey Seow4, Nayung Lee1, Annachiara Rosa5, Chloe Roustan5, Catherine F Houlihan6, Rogier W Sanders3, Ravindra K Gupta7, Peter Cherepanov5, Hans J Stauss1, Eleni Nastouli8, Katie J Doores4, Marit J van Gils3, Laura E McCoy9.
Abstract
Multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines show protective efficacy, which is most likely mediated by neutralizing antibodies recognizing the viral entry protein, spike. Because new SARS-CoV-2 variants are emerging rapidly, as exemplified by the B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 lineages, it is critical to understand whether antibody responses induced by infection with the original SARS-CoV-2 virus or current vaccines remain effective. In this study, we evaluate neutralization of a series of mutated spike pseudotypes based on divergence from SARS-CoV and then compare neutralization of the B.1.1.7 spike pseudotype and individual mutations. Spike-specific monoclonal antibody neutralization is reduced dramatically; in contrast, polyclonal antibodies from individuals infected in early 2020 remain active against most mutated spike pseudotypes, but potency is reduced in a minority of samples. This work highlights that changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike can alter neutralization sensitivity and underlines the need for effective real-time monitoring of emerging mutations and their effect on vaccine efficacy.Entities:
Keywords: B.1.1.7; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; immune escape; neutralization; serology; variant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33713594 PMCID: PMC7936541 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Rep Impact factor: 9.423