| Literature DB >> 33713429 |
Joshua N Gustine1,2, Lian Xu1, Guang Yang1,3, Xia Liu1, Amanda Kofides1, Nicholas Tsakmaklis1, Manit Munshi1, Maria Demos1, Maria L Guerrera1, Kirsten Meid1, Christopher J Patterson1, Shayna Sarosiek1,3, Andrew R Branagan3,4, Zachary R Hunter1, Jorge J Castillo1,3, Steven P Treon1,3.
Abstract
CXCR4 mutations impact disease presentation and treatment outcomes in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). Non-uniform testing for CXCR4 mutations may account for discordant findings in WM clinical trials. We compared two approaches used in these trials for detection of the most common CXCR4 (S338X) variant: targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) using unselected bone marrow (BM) samples, and combined allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) and Sanger sequencing with unselected and CD19-selected BM samples. Our findings showed that targeted NGS frequently yielded false-negative results. Both CD19 selection and AS-PCR markedly improved detection of CXCR4S338X mutations. Sensitivity was adversely impacted by low BM involvement and CXCR4 mutation clonality.Entities:
Keywords: CXCR4; Waldenström macroglobulinemia; ibrutinib; next generation sequencing; zanubrutinib
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33713429 PMCID: PMC9113056 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 8.615