Literature DB >> 33713341

Identification of SARS-CoV-2 in the vaginal fluid and cervical exfoliated cells of women with active COVID-19 infection: A pilot study.

Kavita Khoiwal1, Deepjyoti Kalita2, Ravi Shankar2, Reena Kumari1, Deepika Dhundi1, Anupama Bahadur1, Prasan Kumar Panda3, Jaya Chaturvedi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 infection; SARS-CoV-2; cervical exfoliated cells; vaginal fluid

Year:  2021        PMID: 33713341      PMCID: PMC9087647          DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


× No keyword cloud information.
SARS‐CoV‐2 has been identified in nasopharyngeal secretions, feces, urine, semen, and tears. Foundational research about the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 in the female genital tract may help to determine the risk of sexual transmission, as well as the risk of mother‐to‐child transmission during labor. The present study aimed to assess the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 in vaginal fluid and cervical exfoliated cells of women with active COVID‐19 infection. This study is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/09/027618). Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the local institutional ethics committee (AIIMS/IEC/20/575). This prospective study which was conducted at a tertiary care center included 15 women with active COVID‐19 infection (both symptomatic and asymptomatic), diagnosed by reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) from nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) samples from November 25, 2020, to December 12, 2020. After obtaining informed written consent, vaginal (n = 15) and cervical (n = 12) swabs were collected. Three women with surgically absent cervices only had vaginal swabs collected. Samples for vaginal fluid and cervical exfoliated cells were obtained from the posterior fornix of the vagina and ectocervix using a speculum. Swabs were rotated for at least five seconds and extracted. All samples were kept in a viral transport medium (VTM), immediately transported to the microbiology laboratory, and treated as per the WHO standard protocol for laboratory diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2. Briefly, RNA extraction was performed from the first aliquot of VTM fluid in a magnetic bead‐based automated system (Kingfisher™ Flex System; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) followed by real‐time RT‐PCR using the Taqpath™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) COVID‐19 combo kit (for N, S, and ORF1b targets) in a QuantStudio™ 7 thermocycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Subsequently, a second sample aliquot was processed for transcription mediated amplification (TMA) in an FDA‐approved closed system called the Hologic Panther System (M/s Hologic Ltd, Manchester, UK). Post amplification target (ORF1ab) was detected by nucleic acid hybridization in terms of relative light units (RLU). Table 1 presents the baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory results of the 15 participants. Mean age of participants was 51.26 years (range: 27–70 years). SARS‐CoV‐2 virus was not detected in vaginal and cervical samples by RT‐PCR test; however, it was identified in the vaginal fluid of three (20%) participants with the TMA Panther System. Out of these three participants, two were premenopausal and one was postmenopausal; one was symptomatic with COVID‐19‐related pneumonia (moderate), and the other two had asymptomatic COVID‐19 infection and were admitted for gynecological indications.
TABLE 1

Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory results.

CaseAgeMenopausal statusParityCo‐morbiditiesPresenting complaintsDiagnosis at admissionSeveritySARS‐COV−2 (OP&NP swabs) by RT‐PCRVaginal swab by RT‐PCRCervical swab by RT‐PCRVaginal swab by Panther System (with RLU value)Cervical swab by Panther System
ResultCT value (lowest)
127Premenopausal2AsymptomaticEctopic pregnancyPositive23NegativeNegativePositive ‐ 651 (RLUX1000)Negative
258Postmenopausal5AsymptomaticCervical carcinomaPositive29NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
370Postmenopausal2Sore throatURTIMildPositive24NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
442Surgical menopause2Fever and sore throatURTIMildPositive30NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
570Postmenopausal3Fever, breathlessness, and sore throatCOVID−19‐related pneumoniaModeratePositive21NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
665Postmenopausal3AsymptomaticOvarian carcinomaPositive28NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
754Surgical menopause3DM, HTNFever and breathlessnessCOVID−19‐related pneumoniaModeratePositive28NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
848Premenopausal3TB, hyperthyroidismAsymptomaticOvarian carcinomaPositive30NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
954Postmenopausal4DMFever and sore throatCOVID−19‐related pneumoniaModeratePositive28NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
1044Surgical menopause4AsymptomaticOvarian carcinomaPositive18NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
1145Premenopausal0AsymptomaticOvarian carcinomaPositive27NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
1261Postmenopausal5AsymptomaticOvarian carcinomaPositive27NegativeNegativePositive ‐ 1021 (RLUX1000)Negative
1340Premenopausal3DMFever and breathlessnessCOVID−19‐related pneumoniaModeratePositive23NegativeNegativePositive ‐ 662 (RLUX1000)Negative
1452Postmenopausal3DM, HTNFever and breathlessnessCOVID−19‐related pneumoniaModeratePositive24NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
1539Premenopausal2AsymptomaticLarge uterine fibroidsPositive17NegativeNegativeNegativeNegative

Abbreviations: CT, cycle threshold; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; NP, nasopharyngeal; OP, oropharyngeal; RLU, relative light unit; RT‐PCR, reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction; TB, tuberculosis; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection.

Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory results. Abbreviations: CT, cycle threshold; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; NP, nasopharyngeal; OP, oropharyngeal; RLU, relative light unit; RT‐PCR, reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction; TB, tuberculosis; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection. We could only find one study which reported detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 in vaginal swabs, while other case studies did not identify the presence of SARS‐CoV‐2 in vaginal fluid. , The detection rate in the present study was 20%, which might be explained by the higher analytical sensitivity and specificity of TMA‐based technology than RT‐PCR testing. , The strengths of the study were its prospective nature, inclusion of both reproductive age and postmenopausal women with mild to moderate COVID‐19 disease severity, and utilization of two different testing techniques (RT‐PCR & TMA). However, the small sample size and short study period are potential limitations. A larger cohort and longer duration of study would produce more robust results. This pilot study demonstrated that a negative RT‐PCR test result does not rule out the possibility of a low level of SARS‐CoV‐2 in the female genital tract of women with confirmed COVID‐19 infection.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

KK and DK proposed the idea for the analyses. RK and DD collected the samples and relevant data. DK and RS performed the laboratory analysis. KK drafted the manuscript with direction from DK and JC. AB, PP and JC critically evaluated the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
  6 in total

1.  High-Throughput Transcription-mediated amplification on the Hologic Panther is a highly sensitive method of detection for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Andrew J Gorzalski; Honglin Tian; Chris Laverdure; Sergey Morzunov; Subhash C Verma; Stephanie VanHooser; Mark W Pandori
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Performance Characteristics of a High-Throughput Automated Transcription-Mediated Amplification Test for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.

Authors:  Jimmykim Pham; Sarah Meyer; Catherine Nguyen; Analee Williams; Melissa Hunsicker; Ian McHardy; Inessa Gendlina; D Yitzchak Goldstein; Amy S Fox; Angela Hudson; Paul Darby; Paul Hovey; Jose Morales; James Mitchell; Karen Harrington; Mehrdad Majlessi; Joshua Moberly; Ankur Shah; Andrew Worlock; Marion Walcher; Barbara Eaton; Damon Getman; Craig Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  On the whereabouts of SARS-CoV-2 in the human body: A systematic review.

Authors:  Wim Trypsteen; Jolien Van Cleemput; Willem van Snippenberg; Sarah Gerlo; Linos Vandekerckhove
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.823

4.  Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in vaginal swabs of women with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection: a prospective study.

Authors:  A Schwartz; Y Yogev; A Zilberman; S Alpern; A Many; R Yousovich; R Gamzu
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  SARS-CoV-2 Is Not Detectable in the Vaginal Fluid of Women With Severe COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Lin Qiu; Xia Liu; Meng Xiao; Jing Xie; Wei Cao; Zhengyin Liu; Abraham Morse; Yuhua Xie; Taisheng Li; Lan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 20.999

6.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 detection in the female lower genital tract.

Authors:  Pengfei Cui; Zhe Chen; Tian Wang; Jun Dai; Jinjin Zhang; Ting Ding; Jingjing Jiang; Jia Liu; Cong Zhang; Wanying Shan; Sheng Wang; Yueguang Rong; Jiang Chang; Xiaoping Miao; Xiangyi Ma; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 10.693

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Risk of vertical transmission of SARS CoV-2 infection to neonates born to covid positive mothers: A pilot study from a tertiary care hospital of North India.

Authors:  Sangam Jha; Akanksha Singh; Monika Anant; Poonam Bhadani; Bhabesh Kant Chowdhary; Mala Mahto; Binod Kumar Pati
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.065

2.  Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the lower genital tract of women with active COVID-19 infection: A prospective study.

Authors:  Kavita Khoiwal; Deepjyoti Kalita; Reena Kumari; Deepika Dhundi; Ravi Shankar; Ranjeeta Kumari; Amrita Gaurav; Anupama Bahadur; Prasan Kumar Panda; Akhil Tomy; Jaya Chaturvedi
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 3.  Evidence mapping and review of long-COVID and its underlying pathophysiological mechanism.

Authors:  Anushri Umesh; Kumar Pranay; Ramesh Chandra Pandey; Mukesh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 7.455

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.