Junmin Shen1,2, Jingyang Sun1,2, Yinqiao Du1,2, Bohan Zhang1,2, Tiejian Li1,2, Yonggang Zhou3,4. 1. Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, 100853, China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China. 3. Medical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, 100853, China. ygzhou301@163.com. 4. Department of Orthopedics, The First Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China. ygzhou301@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographical results of asymmetrically reconstructed total hip arthroplasty in patients with bilateral dysplastic arthritic hips with one hip Crowe II-III and the other hip Crowe IV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2006 to April 2019, we evaluated 23 patients who had a reconstruction of one Crowe II-III hip with high hip center (HHC) and the other Crowe IV hip at the anatomical position (H group). The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared with those of a control group of 19 patients with bilateral dysplasia who had one Crowe IV hip and the contralateral hip both reconstructed in the anatomical position (A group). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed, and a complete follow-up was conducted for all patients. RESULTS: The mean vertical center of rotation (V-COR) and horizontal center of rotation (H-COR) in the H group were 30.6 ± 5.8 mm and 30.0 ± 5.5 mm, respectively. In the A group, the corresponding values were 14.0 ± 4.3 mm and 23.0 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. A significant difference was found in terms of V-COR and H-COR between the two groups, and no significant difference was shown regarding the cup inclination, abductor lever arm (ALA), ALA ratio, and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Three patients of the H group and four patients of the A group exhibited LLD > 10 mm. All seven patients who had LLD > 10 mm underwent the shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy (SSTO) of the Crowe IV hip. Subgroup analysis based on the presence and absence of SSTO showed that the LLD of the SSTO group was greater than that of the non-SSTO group in both groups, but the difference was only statistically significant in the A group. At the last follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Scores significantly improved in the two groups, and there was no revision during the follow-up period. In the H group, four patients presented with a slight limp and three patients with a moderate limp, while it was six patients and one patient in the A group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetrical reconstruction in patients with bilateral dysplastic arthritic hips with one hip Crowe II-III and the other Crowe IV is acceptable and comparable when compared with bilateral anatomical reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective observational study. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trail Registry. ChiCTR2000033848.
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographical results of asymmetrically reconstructed total hip arthroplasty in patients with bilateral dysplastic arthritic hips with one hip Crowe II-III and the other hip Crowe IV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2006 to April 2019, we evaluated 23 patients who had a reconstruction of one Crowe II-III hip with high hip center (HHC) and the other Crowe IV hip at the anatomical position (H group). The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared with those of a control group of 19 patients with bilateral dysplasia who had one Crowe IV hip and the contralateral hip both reconstructed in the anatomical position (A group). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed, and a complete follow-up was conducted for all patients. RESULTS: The mean vertical center of rotation (V-COR) and horizontal center of rotation (H-COR) in the H group were 30.6 ± 5.8 mm and 30.0 ± 5.5 mm, respectively. In the A group, the corresponding values were 14.0 ± 4.3 mm and 23.0 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. A significant difference was found in terms of V-COR and H-COR between the two groups, and no significant difference was shown regarding the cup inclination, abductor lever arm (ALA), ALA ratio, and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Three patients of the H group and four patients of the A group exhibited LLD > 10 mm. All seven patients who had LLD > 10 mm underwent the shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy (SSTO) of the Crowe IV hip. Subgroup analysis based on the presence and absence of SSTO showed that the LLD of the SSTO group was greater than that of the non-SSTO group in both groups, but the difference was only statistically significant in the A group. At the last follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Scores significantly improved in the two groups, and there was no revision during the follow-up period. In the H group, four patients presented with a slight limp and three patients with a moderate limp, while it was six patients and one patient in the A group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetrical reconstruction in patients with bilateral dysplastic arthritic hips with one hip Crowe II-III and the other Crowe IV is acceptable and comparable when compared with bilateral anatomical reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective observational study. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trail Registry. ChiCTR2000033848.
Entities:
Keywords:
Crowe II–III; Crowe IV; Developmental dysplasia of the hip; High hip center; Total hip arthroplasty
Authors: G Papachristou; P Hatzigrigoris; K Panousis; S Plessas; J Sourlas; C Levidiotis; E Chronopoulos Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2005-12-14 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Vincent P Galea; Inari Laaksonen; Gabrielle S Donahue; Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Henrik Malchau; Charles Bragdon Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Benedict A Rogers; Shawn Garbedian; Raul A Kuchinad; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Allan E Gross Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 5.284