Guntz Emmanuel1, Pourveur Arnaud2, Gouwy Jonathan2, Renard Marie2, Mocanu Iulia3, Pather Sanjiva3, Fils Jean-François4, Vannieuwenhove Olivier5. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Braine L'Alleud Waterloo, Rue Wayez, 35, 1420, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium. eguntz@ulb.ac.be. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Braine L'Alleud Waterloo, Rue Wayez, 35, 1420, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium. 3. Department of Radiology, Hôpital Braine L'Alleud Waterloo, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium. 4. Ars Statistica Private Statistic Society. Nivelles (S.P.R.L), 1400, Nivelles, Belgium. 5. Department of Orthopedics, Hôpital Braine L'Alleud Waterloo, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used for transforaminal approaches. We evaluated whether fusing computed tomography (CT) images with dynamic US could be based on bony and surface landmarks in two phantom models. METHODS: Recordings were performed in a gelatin-based sonographic phantom and in a computerized imaging reference system training phantom. Three anesthesiologists performed 10 US and CT image fusions via three different techniques: (1) using locations of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) spinous process and the two posterior superior iliac spines in both images, (2) using the two lateral edges of the laminae rather than posterior superior iliac spines, and (3) using skin landmarks. Techniques were compared using values of precision (High quality of fusion: VP inferior to 10). Three punctures targeting the L4-L5 right foramina were made, and needle positions were checked using X-ray. RESULTS: Sixty fusions were performed in the gelatin phantom and 90 in the training phantom. VPs values of the 150 fusions were inferior to 5. Technique 2 was superior to one [operator 1: VP: 1.12 ± 0.54 vs. 2.38 ± 1.49; operator 2: 0.6 ± 0.39 vs. 3.66 ± 1.22; operator 3: 0.89 ± 0.31 vs. 1.23 ± 0.63 (p < 0.001)] with the gelatin phantom. There were no differences with the second phantom. X-ray examinations confirmed L4-L5 needle positioning. CONCLUSION: Bony and surface landmarks allowed for accurate fusion of CT and US images of the lumbar spine. These techniques, performed on phantoms, allowed for precise localization and puncturing of lumbar neural foramina.
PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used for transforaminal approaches. We evaluated whether fusing computed tomography (CT) images with dynamic US could be based on bony and surface landmarks in two phantom models. METHODS: Recordings were performed in a gelatin-based sonographic phantom and in a computerized imaging reference system training phantom. Three anesthesiologists performed 10 US and CT image fusions via three different techniques: (1) using locations of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) spinous process and the two posterior superior iliac spines in both images, (2) using the two lateral edges of the laminae rather than posterior superior iliac spines, and (3) using skin landmarks. Techniques were compared using values of precision (High quality of fusion: VP inferior to 10). Three punctures targeting the L4-L5 right foramina were made, and needle positions were checked using X-ray. RESULTS: Sixty fusions were performed in the gelatin phantom and 90 in the training phantom. VPs values of the 150 fusions were inferior to 5. Technique 2 was superior to one [operator 1: VP: 1.12 ± 0.54 vs. 2.38 ± 1.49; operator 2: 0.6 ± 0.39 vs. 3.66 ± 1.22; operator 3: 0.89 ± 0.31 vs. 1.23 ± 0.63 (p < 0.001)] with the gelatin phantom. There were no differences with the second phantom. X-ray examinations confirmed L4-L5 needle positioning. CONCLUSION: Bony and surface landmarks allowed for accurate fusion of CT and US images of the lumbar spine. These techniques, performed on phantoms, allowed for precise localization and puncturing of lumbar neural foramina.
Authors: Collin Clarke; John Moore; Christopher Wedlake; Donald Lee; Su Ganapathy; Maher Salbalbal; Timothy Wilson; Terry Peters; Daniel Bainbridge Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Klaus Galiano; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Gerd Bodner; Martin Freund; Herbert Maurer; Florian Stefan Kamelger; Reinhold Schatzer; Franz Ploner Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Koen Van Boxem; Mienke Rijsdijk; Guy Hans; Jasper de Jong; Jan Willem Kallewaard; Kris Vissers; Maarten van Kleef; James P Rathmell; Jan Van Zundert Journal: Pain Pract Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 3.183