Ruth F Parker1, Emma L Figures2, Charlotte Am Paddison3, James Idm Matheson4, David N Blane5, John A Ford6. 1. Medical Student, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 2. GPST2 Registrar, West Cambridgeshire GP Training Programme, Cambridge, UK. 3. Senior Fellow, Nuffield Trust, London, UK. 4. Chair, Health Inequalities Standing Group, Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK. 5. Clinical Research Fellow in General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. 6. Clinical Lecturer in Public Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK jf653@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has led to rapid and widespread use of remote consultations in general practice, but the health inequalities impact remains unknown. AIM: To explore the impact of remote consultations in general practice, compared to face-to-face consultations, on utilisation and clinical outcomes across socioeconomic and disadvantaged groups. DESIGN & SETTING: Systematic review. METHOD: The authors undertook an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to June 2020. The study included studies that compared remote consultations to face-to-face consultations in primary care and reported outcomes by PROGRESS Plus criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Data were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Based on 13 studies that explored telephone and internet-based consultations, this review found that telephone consultations were used by younger people of working age, the very old, and non-immigrants, with internet-based consultations more likely to be used by younger people. Women consistently used more remote forms of consulting than men. Socioeconomic and ethnicity findings were mixed, with weak evidence that patients from more affluent areas were more likely to use internet-based communication. Remote consultations appeared to help patients with opioid dependence remain engaged with primary care. No studies reported on the impact on quality of care or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Remote consultations in general practice are likely to be used more by younger, working people, non-immigrants, older patients, and women, with internet-based consultations more by younger, affluent, and educated groups. Widespread use of remote consultations should be treated with caution until the inequalities impact on clinical outcomes and quality of care is known.
BACKGROUND:COVID-19 has led to rapid and widespread use of remote consultations in general practice, but the health inequalities impact remains unknown. AIM: To explore the impact of remote consultations in general practice, compared to face-to-face consultations, on utilisation and clinical outcomes across socioeconomic and disadvantaged groups. DESIGN & SETTING: Systematic review. METHOD: The authors undertook an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to June 2020. The study included studies that compared remote consultations to face-to-face consultations in primary care and reported outcomes by PROGRESS Plus criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Data were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Based on 13 studies that explored telephone and internet-based consultations, this review found that telephone consultations were used by younger people of working age, the very old, and non-immigrants, with internet-based consultations more likely to be used by younger people. Women consistently used more remote forms of consulting than men. Socioeconomic and ethnicity findings were mixed, with weak evidence that patients from more affluent areas were more likely to use internet-based communication. Remote consultations appeared to help patients with opioid dependence remain engaged with primary care. No studies reported on the impact on quality of care or clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Remote consultations in general practice are likely to be used more by younger, working people, non-immigrants, older patients, and women, with internet-based consultations more by younger, affluent, and educated groups. Widespread use of remote consultations should be treated with caution until the inequalities impact on clinical outcomes and quality of care is known.
Authors: Janet E Jones; Sarah L Damery; Katherine Phillips; Ameeta Retzer; Pamela Nayyar; Kate Jolly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Georgina Pujolar; Aida Oliver-Anglès; Ingrid Vargas; María-Luisa Vázquez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Margit Neher; Annette Nygårdh; Anders Broström; Johan Lundgren; Peter Johansson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 5.428