George Lee1, Oliver T Clough1, Joseph A Walker1, Raymond E Anakwe2,3. 1. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Praed Street, London, UK. 2. Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Praed Street, London, UK. Raymond.anakwe@nhs.net. 3. Department of Surgery, Imperial College, South Kensington, London, UK. Raymond.anakwe@nhs.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective qualitative survey to ascertain the perceptions and experience of National Health Service patients in the United Kingdom who underwent planned or elective procedures and surgery at alternate 'clean' hospital sites during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. These alternate 'clean' hospital sites were independent hospitals running active staff and patient testing programmes for COVID-19 and which did not admit or treat patients suffering with COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective survey was undertaken to include patients at least 30 days after a planned surgery or procedure conducted at a 'clean' alternate hospital site during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted using structured interviews undertaken by trained assessors. A 20% sample group of patients were randomly selected to participate in this study. Qualitative data related to confidence, safety and perceptions of safety were collected. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (60%) reported that they had prior worries or concerns about undergoing an elective procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 47 patients (30%) had delayed their surgery at least once because of these concerns. A total of 150 patients (95%) felt that the precautions in place to protect their safety in the setting of an alternate 'clean' hospital site were well thought out and proportionate. Patients reported high levels of confidence in the measures undertaken. Separation of patient pathways using the independent sector and patient testing were identified by patients as having the greatest impact on their perception of safety. CONCLUSIONS: Patient confidence will be key to ensuring uptake of planned and elective procedures and surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perceptions of safety will be key to this confidence and efforts to demonstrably enhance safety are well received by patients. In particular, patients felt that a dedicated programme of patient testing and separation of patient pathways provided the greatest levels of confidence in the safety of their treatment.
BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective qualitative survey to ascertain the perceptions and experience of National Health Service patients in the United Kingdom who underwent planned or elective procedures and surgery at alternate 'clean' hospital sites during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. These alternate 'clean' hospital sites were independent hospitals running active staff and patient testing programmes for COVID-19 and which did not admit or treat patients suffering with COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective survey was undertaken to include patients at least 30 days after a planned surgery or procedure conducted at a 'clean' alternate hospital site during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted using structured interviews undertaken by trained assessors. A 20% sample group of patients were randomly selected to participate in this study. Qualitative data related to confidence, safety and perceptions of safety were collected. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (60%) reported that they had prior worries or concerns about undergoing an elective procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 47 patients (30%) had delayed their surgery at least once because of these concerns. A total of 150 patients (95%) felt that the precautions in place to protect their safety in the setting of an alternate 'clean' hospital site were well thought out and proportionate. Patients reported high levels of confidence in the measures undertaken. Separation of patient pathways using the independent sector and patient testing were identified by patients as having the greatest impact on their perception of safety. CONCLUSIONS:Patient confidence will be key to ensuring uptake of planned and elective procedures and surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perceptions of safety will be key to this confidence and efforts to demonstrably enhance safety are well received by patients. In particular, patients felt that a dedicated programme of patient testing and separation of patient pathways provided the greatest levels of confidence in the safety of their treatment.
Authors: Justin Chang; Warran Wignadasan; Christina Kontoghiorghe; Babar Kayani; Sandeep Singh; Ricci Plastow; Ahmed Magan; Fares Haddad Journal: Bone Jt Open Date: 2020-11-01
Authors: James Alexander Morris; Jonathan Super; Daniel Huntley; Thomas Ashdown; William Harland; Raymond Anakwe Journal: Bone Jt Open Date: 2020-08-26
Authors: Colin J Rees; Matt D Rutter; Linda Sharp; Bu Hayee; James E East; Pradeep Bhandari; Ian Penman Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-09-02
Authors: Christy E Cauley; Rachel Smith; Keith D Lillemoe; Gerard M Doherty; Lawrence Scott Levin; Steven D Wexner; Yves Sonnay; Mary Brindle Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Riccardo Campi; Riccardo Tellini; Antonio Andrea Grosso; Daniele Amparore; Andrea Mari; Lorenzo Viola; Andrea Cocci; Paolo Polverino; Enrico Checcucci; Paolo Alessio; Cristian Fiori; Andrea Minervini; Marco Carini; Francesco Porpiglia; Sergio Serni Journal: Urology Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 2.649