Xingrong Shen1, Siyi Xiao1, Rong Liu1, Guixian Tong2, Tongzhu Liu2, Debin Wang3. 1. School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, China. 2. The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, 17 Lujiang Road, Hefei, China. 3. School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, China. dbwang@vip.sina.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite tremendous investment worldwide, hypertension treatment and control rates remain low. The complexity and long-term dynamics of influencing factors make personalized management inevitable and challenging. This protocol describes Personalized Hypertension Management in Anhui, China (PHMA), a project that uses a package of innovative approaches in tailoring interventions to individual patient's dynamic complications and contexts. METHODS/ DESIGN:PHMA strives to reduce hypertension harms by eight "objective behaviors" (e.g., self-monitoring and reporting, healthy diet, physical exercise/activities). These objective behaviors are promoted through five intervention measures: support for self- monitoring, supervised machine communications, daily education or reminder messages, weekly blood pressure notification, and quarterly signed feedback. PHMA uses ten categories and over 300 variables in selecting and refining intervention procedures and content for individual patients. Efficacy of the intervention package is evaluated using a cluster randomized controlled trial design involving a total of 60 site communities and 3352 hypertension patients. Primary measure for the evaluation is systolic and diastolic blood pressure; while secondary evaluation measures include quality of life (EQ5D-5L), occurrence of hypertension-related complications (such as cerebral hemorrhage, coronary heart disease, myocardial or cerebral infarction), healthcare utilization and scores of objective behaviors. DISCUSSION: PHMA uses novel, low cost and sustainable approaches to tailor interventions to the dynamic conditions and contexts of individual patients. Unlike contemporary approaches to hypertension management which are mainly population based, each participant patient in PHMA applies a unique intervention package and all messages, feedbacks and other materials sent out to individual patients are different from each other. PHMA is the first project that adopts comprehensive tailoring and if proved effective, it should have important implications for future research, practice and policy-making. Trial registration ISRCTN10999269. July 17, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10999269 .
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite tremendous investment worldwide, hypertension treatment and control rates remain low. The complexity and long-term dynamics of influencing factors make personalized management inevitable and challenging. This protocol describes Personalized Hypertension Management in Anhui, China (PHMA), a project that uses a package of innovative approaches in tailoring interventions to individual patient's dynamic complications and contexts. METHODS/ DESIGN: PHMA strives to reduce hypertension harms by eight "objective behaviors" (e.g., self-monitoring and reporting, healthy diet, physical exercise/activities). These objective behaviors are promoted through five intervention measures: support for self- monitoring, supervised machine communications, daily education or reminder messages, weekly blood pressure notification, and quarterly signed feedback. PHMA uses ten categories and over 300 variables in selecting and refining intervention procedures and content for individual patients. Efficacy of the intervention package is evaluated using a cluster randomized controlled trial design involving a total of 60 site communities and 3352 hypertensionpatients. Primary measure for the evaluation is systolic and diastolic blood pressure; while secondary evaluation measures include quality of life (EQ5D-5L), occurrence of hypertension-related complications (such as cerebral hemorrhage, coronary heart disease, myocardial or cerebral infarction), healthcare utilization and scores of objective behaviors. DISCUSSION: PHMA uses novel, low cost and sustainable approaches to tailor interventions to the dynamic conditions and contexts of individual patients. Unlike contemporary approaches to hypertension management which are mainly population based, each participantpatient in PHMA applies a unique intervention package and all messages, feedbacks and other materials sent out to individual patients are different from each other. PHMA is the first project that adopts comprehensive tailoring and if proved effective, it should have important implications for future research, practice and policy-making. Trial registration ISRCTN10999269. July 17, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10999269 .
Authors: David Moher; Sally Hopewell; Kenneth F Schulz; Victor Montori; Peter C Gøtzsche; P J Devereaux; Diana Elbourne; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Pascal Geldsetzer; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Maja-Emilia Marcus; Cara Ebert; Zhaxybay Zhumadilov; Chea S Wesseh; Lindiwe Tsabedze; Adil Supiyev; Lela Sturua; Silver K Bahendeka; Abla M Sibai; Sarah Quesnel-Crooks; Bolormaa Norov; Kibachio J Mwangi; Omar Mwalim; Roy Wong-McClure; Mary T Mayige; Joao S Martins; Nuno Lunet; Demetre Labadarios; Khem B Karki; Gibson B Kagaruki; Jutta M A Jorgensen; Nahla C Hwalla; Dismand Houinato; Corine Houehanou; Mohamed Msaidié; David Guwatudde; Mongal S Gurung; Gladwell Gathecha; Maria Dorobantu; Albertino Damasceno; Pascal Bovet; Brice W Bicaba; Krishna K Aryal; Glennis Andall-Brereton; Kokou Agoudavi; Andrew Stokes; Justine I Davies; Till Bärnighausen; Rifat Atun; Sebastian Vollmer; Lindsay M Jaacks Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bruno M C Silva; Joel J P C Rodrigues; Isabel de la Torre Díez; Miguel López-Coronado; Kashif Saleem Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Goodarz Danaei; Mariel M Finucane; John K Lin; Gitanjali M Singh; Christopher J Paciorek; Melanie J Cowan; Farshad Farzadfar; Gretchen A Stevens; Stephen S Lim; Leanne M Riley; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Heather E Barry; Laura E Bedford; Máiréad McGrattan; Cristín Ryan; A Peter Passmore; A Louise Robinson; Gerard J Molloy; Carmel M Darcy; Hilary Buchanan; Carmel M Hughes Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 2.655