Literature DB >> 33711459

Shotgun: A Bayesian seamless phase I-II design to accelerate the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapy.

Liyun Jiang1, Ruobing Li2, Fangrong Yan3, Timothy A Yap4, Ying Yuan5.   

Abstract

Drug development of novel antitumor agents is conventionally divided by phase and cancer indication. With the advent of new molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies, this approach has become inefficient and dysfunctional. We propose a Bayesian seamless phase I-II "shotgun" design to evaluate the safety and antitumor efficacy of a new drug in multiple cancer indications simultaneously. "Shotgun" is used to describe the design feature that the trial begins with an all-comer dose finding phase to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and then is seamlessly split to multiple indication-specific cohort expansions. Patients treated during dose finding are rolled over to the cohort expansion for more efficient evaluation of efficacy, while patients enrolled in cohort expansion contribute to the continuous learning of the safety and tolerability of the new drug. During cohort expansion, interim analyses are performed to discontinue ineffective or unsafe expansion cohorts early. To improve the efficiency of such interim analyses, we propose a clustered Bayesian hierarchical model (CBHM) to adaptively borrow information across indications. A simulation study shows that compared to conventional approaches and the standard Bayesian hierarchical model, the shotgun design has substantially higher probabilities to discover indications that are responsive to the treatment in question, and is associated with a reasonable false discovery rate. The shotgun provides a phase I-II trial design for accelerating drug development and to build a more robust foundation for subsequent phase III trials. The proposed CBHM methodology also provides an efficient design for basket trials.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basket trials, Bayesian hierarchical model; Bayesian adaptive design; Seamless design

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33711459      PMCID: PMC8180491          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  24 in total

1.  Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR.

Authors:  Anirudh Prahallad; Chong Sun; Sidong Huang; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Ramon Salazar; Davide Zecchin; Roderick L Beijersbergen; Alberto Bardelli; René Bernards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.

Authors:  Guosheng Yin; Yisheng Li; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Increasing the efficiency of oncology basket trials using a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Zheyu Liu; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Richardus Vonk
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Efficacy of Larotrectinib in TRK Fusion-Positive Cancers in Adults and Children.

Authors:  Alexander Drilon; Theodore W Laetsch; Shivaani Kummar; Steven G DuBois; Ulrik N Lassen; George D Demetri; Michael Nathenson; Robert C Doebele; Anna F Farago; Alberto S Pappo; Brian Turpin; Afshin Dowlati; Marcia S Brose; Leo Mascarenhas; Noah Federman; Jordan Berlin; Wafik S El-Deiry; Christina Baik; John Deeken; Valentina Boni; Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian; Matthew Taylor; Erin R Rudzinski; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Davendra P S Sohal; Patrick C Ma; Luis E Raez; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Ryma Benayed; Marc Ladanyi; Brian B Tuch; Kevin Ebata; Scott Cruickshank; Nora C Ku; Michael C Cox; Douglas S Hawkins; David S Hong; David M Hyman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ick Hoon Jin; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Bayesian basket trial design with exchangeability monitoring.

Authors:  Brian P Hobbs; Rick Landin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.

Authors:  Heng Zhou; Ying Yuan; Lei Nie
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine-cisplatin with or without trastuzumab in HER2-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  U Gatzemeier; G Groth; C Butts; N Van Zandwijk; F Shepherd; A Ardizzoni; C Barton; P Ghahramani; V Hirsh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.