Literature DB >> 33711187

3D morphometric quantification of maxillae and defects for patients with unilateral cleft palate via deep learning-based CBCT image auto-segmentation.

Xiaoyu Wang1,2, Matthew Pastewait3, Tai-Hsien Wu4, Chunfeng Lian5, Beatriz Tejera6, Yan-Ting Lee7, Feng-Chang Lin8, Li Wang9, Dinggang Shen10,11,12, Song Li1, Ching-Chang Ko4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the 3D asymmetry of the maxilla in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCP) and investigate the defect factors responsible for the variability of the maxilla on the cleft side using a deep-learning-based CBCT image segmentation protocol. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 60 patients with UCP were acquired. The samples in this study consisted of 39 males and 21 females, with a mean age of 11.52 years (SD = 3.27 years; range of 8-18 years).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The deep-learning-based protocol was used to segment the maxilla and defect initially, followed by manual refinement. Paired t-tests were performed to characterize the maxillary asymmetry. A multiple linear regression was carried out to investigate the relationship between the defect parameters and those of the cleft side of the maxilla.
RESULTS: The cleft side of the maxilla demonstrated a significant decrease in maxillary volume and length as well as alveolar length, anterior width, posterior width, anterior height and posterior height. A significant increase in maxillary anterior width was demonstrated on the cleft side of the maxilla. There was a close relationship between the defect parameters and those of the cleft side of the maxilla.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the 3D volumetric segmentations, significant hypoplasia of the maxilla on the cleft side existed in the pyriform aperture and alveolar crest area near the defect. The defect structures appeared to contribute to the variability of the maxilla on the cleft side.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D measurement; CBCT segmentation; cleft palate; deep learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33711187      PMCID: PMC8435046          DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  21 in total

1.  Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC).

Authors: 
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-04-06

Review 2.  Cleft lip and palate: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Bilal G Taib; Adnan G Taib; Andrew C Swift; Simon van Eeden
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 3.  Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Leslie; Mary L Marazita
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 4.  Cleft lip, nose, and palate: the nasal septum as the pacemaker for midfacial growth.

Authors:  Brian K Hall; David S Precious
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-09-27

5.  Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus and maxilla for adolescent patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Manfei Zhang; Jianhui Han; Hao Wang; Song Li
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Cleft Skeletal Asymmetry: Asymmetry Index, Classification and Application.

Authors:  Delnaz S Patel; Rachel Jacobson; Yao Duan; Linping Zhao; David Morris; Mimis N Cohen
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2017-12-14

7.  A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of facial asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate individuals.

Authors:  Li'an Yang; Zhenqi Chen; Xiaoyue Zhang
Journal:  J Oral Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.556

8.  Three-dimensional evaluation of midfacial asymmetry in patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Youn-Kyung Choi; Soo-Byung Park; Yong-Il Kim; Woo-Sung Son
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  3D segmentation of maxilla in cone-beam computed tomography imaging using base invariant wavelet active shape model on customized two-manifold topology.

Authors:  Yu-Bing Chang; James J Xia; Peng Yuan; Tai-Hong Kuo; Zixiang Xiong; Jaime Gateno; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.535

10.  Craniofacial computerized tomography analysis of the midface of patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Sunjay Suri; Ashok Utreja; Niranjan Khandelwal; Sushil K Mago
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.