Literature DB >> 33711069

Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.

Rosalie Weigand1, Thomas Jacobsen1.   

Abstract

Aesthetic experiences have been distinguished from other experiences based on an aesthetic mode of processing that often entails concentrating working memory resources on the aesthetic stimulus. Since working memory is a limited-capacity system, there should be a trade-off between available resources and the aesthetic experience. To test whether the intensity of the aesthetic experience is reduced if working memory resources are otherwise occupied, we employed an experience sampling method. One hundred and fifteen undergraduate students (45% female; Mage = 23.50 years, SD = 2.72 years) participated in a 2-week experience sampling study and furnished a total of 15,047 reports of their aesthetic experiences. As measures of current working memory resources, participants answered questions regarding their current working memory load and whether they were engaged in a second task. In addition, they reported whether they had had an aesthetic experience and how much they had savored the aesthetic experience. Multilevel modeling was used for data analysis. A higher working memory load was associated with fewer aesthetic experiences and reduced the savoring of aesthetic experiences. Second tasks, however, that were perceived as demanding and requiring a lot of concentration enhanced the savoring of aesthetic experiences. In sum, other goal-oriented behavior that requires working memory resources appears to conflict with aesthetic experiences in everyday life.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33711069      PMCID: PMC7954329          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  24 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty.

Authors:  Thomas Jacobsen; Ricarda I Schubotz; Lea Höfel; D Yves V Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Leslie H Brown; Jennifer C McVay; Paul J Silvia; Inez Myin-Germeys; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07

4.  Shifting moods, wandering minds: negative moods lead the mind to wander.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Annamay Fitzgerald; Lynden K Miles; Louise H Phillips
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-04

Review 5.  "Stopping for knowledge": The sense of beauty in the perception-action cycle.

Authors:  P Sarasso; M Neppi-Modona; K Sacco; I Ronga
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes?

Authors:  Lea Höfel; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 7.  The neuropsychology of visual artistic production.

Authors:  Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling.

Authors:  Noémi K Schuurman; Ellen L Hamaker
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2018-09-06

9.  Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion.

Authors:  Slobodan Marković
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-01-12

10.  An integrative theory-driven positive emotion regulation intervention.

Authors:  Fanny Weytens; Olivier Luminet; Lesley L Verhofstadt; Moïra Mikolajczak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does self-reported chronic pain influence savoring of aesthetic experiences?

Authors:  Rosalie Weigand; Annika Moosmayer; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.