Literature DB >> 3371094

A reservoir nasal cannula improves protection given by oxygen during muscular exercise in COPD.

S Arlati1, J Rolo, E Micallef, C Sacerdoti, I Brambilla.   

Abstract

We verified the utility of an oxygen economizer (Pendant Oxymizer) in assuring greater protection than nasal prongs against worsening of oxyhemoglobin resting desaturation (delta SaO2) induced by muscular exercise in 16 patients (ten with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] and six with restrictive pulmonary disease). This worsening was quantified as desaturation surface accumulated within five minutes of exercise and was expressed in arbitrary units (au). Each patient carried out the same exercise three times, in a randomized fashion (breathing air or breathing supplemental oxygen [3 L/min] delivered by either nasal prongs or by oxygen economizer). In patients with obstructive disease, delta SaO2 was reduced from 38 +/- 12.0 au when they were breathing air to 18.1 +/- 11.7 au when breathing oxygen by nasal prongs (p less than 0.001) and to 10.1 +/- 9.5 au when breathing oxygen by economizer (p less than 0.001). In patients with restrictive disease, delta SaO2 was reduced from 35.6 +/- 9.9 au when breathing air to 14.9 +/- 10.2 au breathing oxygen by nasal prongs (p less than 0.01) and to 13.7 +/- 10.3 au breathing oxygen by economizer (p less than 0.01). The difference between breathing by economizer and nasal prongs was significant (paired t-test; p less than 0.01) only in patients with COPD. One explanation could lie in the different values of the respiratory rate, which was significantly greater in patients with restrictive disease (20.7 +/- 1.2 breaths per minute at rest and 25.8 +/- 1.5 with exercise) than in patients with obstructive disease (15.3 +/- 1.2 breaths per minute at rest and 20.8 +/- 1.4 with exercise).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3371094     DOI: 10.1378/chest.93.6.1165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  3 in total

1.  Technical aspects of oxygen saving devices.

Authors:  I Brambilla; S Arlati; I Chiusa; E Micallef
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Short-term ambulatory oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  J M Bradley; B O'Neill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

3.  A randomized cross-over trial on the direct effects of oxygen supplementation therapy using different devices on cycle endurance in hypoxemic patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.

Authors:  Anne Edvardsen; Inga Jarosch; Anita Grongstad; Laura Wiegand; Rainer Gloeckl; Klaus Kenn; Martijn A Spruit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.