Literature DB >> 33710639

Cell-free DNA analysis of maternal blood in prenatal screening for chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications: a systematic review.

Alessandra Familiari1, Simona Boito2, Georgios Rembouskos3, Benedetta Ischia2, Veronica Accurti2, Isabella Fabietti2, Paolo Volpe3, Nicola Persico2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Scientific Societies do not recommend the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing as a first-tier screening for microdeletion and microduplication syndromes (MMs). The aim of this study was to review the current available literature on the performance of cell-free DNA as a screening for MMs.
METHODS: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically from 2000 to January 2020 and articles reporting the diagnostic performance of cfDNA screening for MMs in large (>5000 cases) series were included. Between-study heterogeneity and random effect model for screen positive rate (SPR), false positive rate (FPR) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated.
RESULTS: We identified 42 papers, seven included, for a total of 474,189 pregnancies and 210 cases of MMs. Diagnostic verification of positive cases was available overall in 486 (71.68 %) of 678 cases. The weighted pooled SPR, FPR and PPV were 0.19% (95% CI = 0.09-0.33), 0.07 (95% CI = 0.02-0.15) and 44.1 (95% CI = 31.49-63.07). In conclusion, the pooled PPV of cfDNA testing in screening for MMs was about 40%, ranging from 29% to 91%, for an overall FPR <0.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: No confirmatory analysis was available in cases that did not undergo invasive testing, which were the vast majority of cases with a negative test, and therefore, the DR and the negative predictive value cannot be determined.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-free DNA; fetal cells; fetal diseases; fetal genetic analysis; fetal medicine and diagnostic procedures; genetic counseling; noninvasive prenatal testing; nucleic acids & proteins; whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33710639     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

Review 1.  Genetic testing-whether to allow complete freedom? Direct to consumer tests versus genetic tests for medical purposes.

Authors:  Madej Malgorzata; Sąsiadek Maria; Witt Michał
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Potentials and challenges of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Xijing Liu; Shanling Liu; He Wang; Ting Hu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luca Zaninović; Marko Bašković; Davor Ježek; Ana Katušić Bojanac
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.