Literature DB >> 3371058

Effect of salt concentration and unfrozen water fraction on the viability of slowly frozen ram spermatozoa.

P F Watson1, A E Duncan.   

Abstract

Ram spermatozoa were subjected to a slow rate of freezing (1 degree C/min) in various glycerol-NaCl-water solutions of known composition such that the molal concentration of NaCl (ms) and the unfrozen fraction of water (U) could be calculated at subzero temperatures from the relevant phase diagram. Sperm motility was reduced as ms increased and U correspondingly decreased with temperature. However, by freezing spermatozoa in solutions of differing initial tonicities, but with a constant weight ratio of glycerol: salt, to various subzero temperatures, the effects of ms could be separated from those of U. Motility was found to decrease dramatically at values of U less than 0.07 regardless of ms but, at higher values of U, maximum motility was dependent on the final salt concentration in that fraction, being reduced as the osmolality increased. Sperm cell concentration had no apparent effect on the influence of ms or U on viability in the range studied (3-12 x 10(8) spermatozoa/ml). In order to account for these observations, the effects of osmotic stress on spermatozoa were investigated. When subjected to sudden changes in osmolality of the suspending medium by increasing NaCl or sucrose concentration at room temperature, spermatozoa showed a decreased motility with increasing osmolality. Since no improvement in motility was found on returning the cells to isosmolar conditions cell damage appeared to be irreversible. Furthermore, when placed in solutions of increasing hypotonicity the number of swollen spermatozoa with looped tails increased with increasing hypotonicity. Since the drop in motility seen at low values of U corresponded to those spermatozoa exposed to a hypotonic starting solution, it is suggested that a hypotonic stress followed by a hypertonic stress during freezing and thawing may account for the profound loss of motility in these samples, while a hypertonic stress may account for the strong effect of ms seen at higher values of U.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3371058     DOI: 10.1016/0011-2240(88)90006-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  6 in total

1.  Cryopreservation of boar semen. III: Ultrastructure of boar spermatozoa frozen ultra-rapidly at various stages of conventional freezing and thawing.

Authors:  C O Bwanga; H Ekwall; H Rodriguez-Martinez
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Does low-level laser therapy on degenerated ovine testes improve post-thawed sperm characteristics?

Authors:  Tamie Guibu de Almeida; Maíra Bianchi Rodrigues Alves; Leonardo Batissaco; Mariana Andrade Torres; André Furugen Cesar de Andrade; Rodolfo Daniel Mingoti; Rubens Paes de Arruda; Eneiva Carla Carvalho Celeghini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  High post-thaw survival of ram sperm after partial freeze-drying.

Authors:  Amir Arav; Antonella Idda; Stefano Mario Nieddu; Yehudit Natan; Sergio Ledda
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Evaluation of cryoinjury of spermatozoa after slow (programmed biological freezer) or rapid (liquid nitrogen vapour) freeze-thawing techniques.

Authors:  M E Hammadeh; D Szarvasy; T Zeginiadou; P Rosenbaum; T Georg; W Schmidt
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Putative role of an SLC45 H+/sugar cotransporter in mammalian spermatozoa.

Authors:  Olga Vitavska; Helmut Wieczorek
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Molecular and Histological Evaluation of Sheep Ovarian Tissue Subjected to Lyophilization.

Authors:  Daniela Bebbere; Amir Arav; Stefano Mario Nieddu; Giovanni Pietro Burrai; Sara Succu; Pasquale Patrizio; Sergio Ledda
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.