Emily Herrett1, Elizabeth Williamson2, Kieran Brack3, Alexander Perkins4, Andrew Thayne4, Haleema Shakur-Still4, Ian Roberts4, Danielle Prowse4, Danielle Beaumont4, Zahra Jamal4, Ben Goldacre5, Tjeerd van Staa6, Thomas M MacDonald7, Jane Armitage8, Michael Moore9, Maurice Hoffman10, Liam Smeeth1. 1. Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2. Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 3. Liver Research, King's College Hospital, London, UK. 4. Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 6. Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 7. Medicines Monitoring Unit, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 8. Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 9. School of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 10. London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty persists about whether or not statins cause symptomatic muscle adverse effects (e.g. pain, stiffness and weakness) in the absence of severe myositis. OBJECTIVES: To establish the effect of statins on all muscle symptoms, and the effect of statins on muscle symptoms that are perceived to be statin related. DESIGN: A series of 200 double-blinded N-of-1 trials. SETTING:Participants were recruited from 50 general practices in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were considering discontinuing statin use and those who had discontinued statin use in the last 3 years because of perceived muscle symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised to a sequence of six 2-month treatment periods during which they received 20 mg of atorvastatin daily or a matched placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self-reported muscle symptoms rated using a visual analogue scale on the last week of each treatment period. Secondary outcomes included the participant's belief about the cause of their muscle symptoms, the site of muscle symptoms, how the muscle symptoms affected the participant, any other symptoms they experienced, adherence to medication, the participant's decision about statin treatment following the trial, and whether or not they found their own trial result helpful. RESULTS:A total of 151 out of 200 (75.5%) randomised participants provided one or more visual analogue scale measurements in a placebo period and one or more measurements in a statin period, and were included in the primary analysis. There was no evidence of a difference in muscle symptom scores between statin and placebo periods (mean difference statin minus placebo -0.11, 95% confidence interval -0.36 to 0.14; p = 0.398). Withdrawals, adherence and missing data were similar during the statin periods and the placebo periods. CONCLUSIONS: Among people who previously reported severe muscle symptoms while taking statins, this series of randomised N-of-1 trials found no overall effect of statins on muscle symptoms compared with the placebo. The slight difference in withdrawals due to muscle symptoms suggests that statins may contribute to symptoms in a small number of patients. The results are generalisable to patients who are considering discontinuing or have already discontinued statins because of muscle symptoms, and who are willing to re-challenge or participate in their own N-of-1 trial. FUTURE WORK: We recommend that additional statins and doses are explored using N-of-1 trials. More broadly, N-of-1 trials present a useful tool for exploring transient symptoms with other medications. LIMITATIONS: This study used 20-mg doses of atorvastatin only. Furthermore, a dropout rate of 43% was observed, but this was accounted for in the power calculations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN30952488 and EudraCT 2016-000141-31. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty persists about whether or not statins cause symptomatic muscle adverse effects (e.g. pain, stiffness and weakness) in the absence of severe myositis. OBJECTIVES: To establish the effect of statins on all muscle symptoms, and the effect of statins on muscle symptoms that are perceived to be statin related. DESIGN: A series of 200 double-blinded N-of-1 trials. SETTING:Participants were recruited from 50 general practices in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were considering discontinuing statin use and those who had discontinued statin use in the last 3 years because of perceived muscle symptoms. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomised to a sequence of six 2-month treatment periods during which they received 20 mg of atorvastatin daily or a matched placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self-reported muscle symptoms rated using a visual analogue scale on the last week of each treatment period. Secondary outcomes included the participant's belief about the cause of their muscle symptoms, the site of muscle symptoms, how the muscle symptoms affected the participant, any other symptoms they experienced, adherence to medication, the participant's decision about statin treatment following the trial, and whether or not they found their own trial result helpful. RESULTS: A total of 151 out of 200 (75.5%) randomised participants provided one or more visual analogue scale measurements in a placebo period and one or more measurements in a statin period, and were included in the primary analysis. There was no evidence of a difference in muscle symptom scores between statin and placebo periods (mean difference statin minus placebo -0.11, 95% confidence interval -0.36 to 0.14; p = 0.398). Withdrawals, adherence and missing data were similar during the statin periods and the placebo periods. CONCLUSIONS: Among people who previously reported severe muscle symptoms while taking statins, this series of randomised N-of-1 trials found no overall effect of statins on muscle symptoms compared with the placebo. The slight difference in withdrawals due to muscle symptoms suggests that statins may contribute to symptoms in a small number of patients. The results are generalisable to patients who are considering discontinuing or have already discontinued statins because of muscle symptoms, and who are willing to re-challenge or participate in their own N-of-1 trial. FUTURE WORK: We recommend that additional statins and doses are explored using N-of-1 trials. More broadly, N-of-1 trials present a useful tool for exploring transient symptoms with other medications. LIMITATIONS: This study used 20-mg doses of atorvastatin only. Furthermore, a dropout rate of 43% was observed, but this was accounted for in the power calculations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN30952488 and EudraCT 2016-000141-31. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Entities:
Keywords:
ATORVASTATIN; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CHOLESTEROL; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; MUSCLE PAIN; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SECONDARY PREVENTION; VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE
Authors: Andrea L Schaffer; Nicholas A Buckley; Timothy A Dobbins; Emily Banks; Sallie-Anne Pearson Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Amir Kashani; Christopher O Phillips; JoAnne M Foody; Yongfei Wang; Sandeep Mangalmurti; Dennis T Ko; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jordan Fulcher; Rachel O'Connell; Merryn Voysey; Jonathan Emberson; Lisa Blackwell; Borislava Mihaylova; John Simes; Rory Collins; Adrienne Kirby; Helen Colhoun; Eugene Braunwald; John La Rosa; T R Pedersen; Andrew Tonkin; Barry Davis; Peter Sleight; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Colin Baigent; Anthony Keech Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H Breivik; P C Borchgrevink; S M Allen; L A Rosseland; L Romundstad; E K Breivik Hals; G Kvarstein; A Stubhaug Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: A Keech; R Collins; S MacMahon; J Armitage; A Lawson; K Wallendszus; M Fatemian; E Kearney; V Lyon; J Mindell Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Emily Herrett; Elizabeth Williamson; Kieran Brack; Danielle Beaumont; Alexander Perkins; Andrew Thayne; Haleema Shakur-Still; Ian Roberts; Danielle Prowse; Ben Goldacre; Tjeerd van Staa; Thomas M MacDonald; Jane Armitage; Jon Wimborne; Paula Melrose; Jayshireen Singh; Lucy Brooks; Michael Moore; Maurice Hoffman; Liam Smeeth Journal: BMJ Date: 2021-02-24