Literature DB >> 33709354

Emergency medicine airway leads: a rapid response distributed educational model for emergency department COVID-19 airway management.

Adam Harris1, Lorri Beatty2, Nicholas Sowers2, Sam G Campbell2, David Petrie2, David Hung3, George Kovacs2.   

Abstract

With the first case of COVID-19 confirmed in Canada in early 2020, our country joined in the fight against a novel pathogen in a global pandemic. The stress of uncertainty and practice change was most apparent in the emergency department when it came to managing known or suspected COVID-19 patients requiring airway management. Recognizing the need for a coordinated approach, a province wide rapid response distributed model of continuing professional development for airway management was developed utilizing Airway Leads to help prepare front-line medical personnel providing airway management for these patients. Airway Leads worked with local physicians to deliver consistent, high quality airway education across the province during the initial surge of cases. Education included both in person and virtual sessions along with real time ongoing support through provincial guidelines, videos, and other documents. Physician reported "stress level" pre- and post-Airway Lead support declined from a median score of 9 to 7 (on a 10-point Likert Scale).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway leads; COVID-19; Emergency medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33709354      PMCID: PMC7780901          DOI: 10.1007/s43678-020-00042-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


Background

In early 2020, the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in Canada [1]. Guided by international reports, provincial healthcare systems began preparing for an influx of critically ill patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation [2]. The severity of respiratory illness being reported, combined with the risk of virus transmission to health-care providers during aerosol-generating medical procedures [3], created an urgent need for airway education as several standard aspects of airway management were required to change [4].

Rationale

Clinicians were faced with the difficult task of balancing pre COVID-19 optimal patient care strategies with the health and safety of their clinical teams [3-6].. Airway interventions and therapies commonplace in the emergency department (ED) only weeks prior, were now being reconsidered with respect to their efficacy and safety profile [3-6]. Clinicians were challenged to provide a skillful approach to intubation with a high first pass success rate in hypoxemic, apnea-intolerant patients without the use of conventional active preoxygenation approaches—all while utilizing a higher level of personal protective equipment. The Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) comprises four regional health zones collectively caring for nearly one million people. Provincial COVID-19 airway management guidelines were developed to provide a safe standardized approach to airway management [7]. During the early days of the COVID-19 outbreak, guidelines for airway management were changing rapidly based on evolving Level C observational evidence, expert opinion, and the experiences of others from “hot zones” around the world. The goal of this rapid response continuing professional development intervention was to disseminate the provincially endorsed airway guidelines and support their implementation at the local level.

Description of the innovation

Four Airway Leads were recruited to develop and deliver content to each NSHA zone. Airway Leads were emergency physicians with additional expertise in airway management, medical education and procedural skill teaching. All Airway Leads were Airway Interventions & Management in Emergencies (AIME) certified instructors and received additional COVID-19 education training. Airway Leads liaised with emergency leadership in each zone to curate, design and distribute educational materials developed by provincial airway experts. Four days after program inception, the first COVID-19 education session was delivered on site. Sessions were designed for emergency physicians, nurses, paramedics, and respiratory therapists working in the ED. Physicians from other acute-care specialties (i.e., anesthesia, critical care) were also welcomed to attend. Airway Leads initially travelled to regional and tertiary care hospitals within their zone to conduct education sessions. While > 85% of initial sessions were conducted in person, travel to hospitals was halted by an increase in COVID-19 prevalence prior to all sites being visited. Airway Leads shifted to providing education sessions through videoconferencing. Education sessions were simultaneously facilitated remotely by Airway Leads and on site by local clinicians. Follow up simulation sessions were then organized independentaly by locally established teams, using a “train the trainer” model and utilizing the Airway Lead as a consultant if required. Subsequent on-site simulation session availability varied across the province and was left to each hospital to determine based on their needs. Each site determined the composition of their own COVID-19 airway teams based on available local expertise. As guidelines for airway management of the COVID-19 patient evolved, Airway Leads would provide follow up educational resources highlighting the key practice changes. In addition, questions brought forward by specific sites were discussed as a group prior to response, as the same scenarios had often been reviewed at other sites. Resources were distributed through an open access educational website and updated to reflect evolving evidence [8]. Support materials included locally developed airway checklists, intubation ‘kit-dump’ maps, procedural approach videos, and the provincial COVID-19 airway management guidelines. Provincial ED airway grand rounds were delivered virtually four weeks following the first provincial case. This allowed time for feedback from local EDs after the initial on site / virtual visits to ensure consistency of messaging across the province (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Infographic

Infographic

Discussion

The pace and extent at which clinical practice has changed on the basis of Level C evidence has been unprecedented. Practice changing recommendations required adaptation, adoption and dissemination of materials that may have, in other times, been considered premature for lack of high-quality evidence. Airway Leads utilized previously existing International Airway working groups and forums, telephone and email correspondence with physicians in hot zones, and thorough review of emerging literature and consensus guideline documents to evaluate and adapt the content of education. The concept of “Airway Leads” and “Airway Groups” has been supported by the Difficult Airway Society since 1996, and this is a good example of its application at the provincial level, aimed at improving airway management from the perspectives of anatomy, physiology, logistics, and education [9]. Difficulty in the evaluation of the effectiveness of broad airway quality initiatives has been previously recognized [9]. Within days of announcing this provincial initiative, the first on site education session occurred. Therefore, a pre-intervention evaluation was not performed. Following the first surge of COVID-19 cases in the province, an evaluation using the web-based survey tool Opinio was sent to ED site leads to determine the usefulness of each of the interventions. Amongst physicians in their ED (our target audience for education), the perceived “stress level” pre- and post-Airway Lead support as evaluated by their site lead dropped from a median of 9 to 7 (on a 10-point Likert Scale). In allied health care providers the drop was from 8 to 7.5. ED site leads reported educational interventions as having a “high impact” on preparing their teams with median scores of 8.5–9.5/10, and the majority felt that repeating interventions such as site visits, online provincial rounds, and email/telephone support would be very useful in the setting of another surge of COVID-19 cases. The use of Airway Leads for the delivery of a rapid response distributed model of continuing professional development allowed for the preparation of a large number of front-line medical personnel to safely provide ED airway management for patients with known or suspected COVID-19. The interventions by the Airway Leads led to an overall reduction in COVID-19 related stress amongst physicians but not allied health care providers. Involving members from this group in the development and implementation of future interventions may improve the impact.

Summary

A rapid response distributed model of continuing professional development was developed to help support emergency department teams in the optimization of airway management for patients with known or suspected COVID-19. Using geographic Airway Leads as a support network, provincially developed airway management recommendations were disseminated, implemented, and where necessary adapted to meet local needs and resources.
  7 in total

1.  Diagnosis and Management of First Case of COVID-19 in Canada: Lessons Applied From SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Xavier Marchand-Senécal; Rob Kozak; Samira Mubareka; Natasha Salt; Jonathan B Gubbay; Alireza Eshaghi; Vanessa Allen; Yan Li; Natalie Bastien; Matthew Gilmour; Omar Ozaldin; Jerome A Leis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  The Airway Lead: opportunities to improve institutional and personal preparedness for airway management.

Authors:  Alistair F McNarry; Tim M Cook; Paul A Baker; Ellen P O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Emergency tracheal intubation in 202 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: lessons learnt and international expert recommendations.

Authors:  Wenlong Yao; Tingting Wang; Bailin Jiang; Feng Gao; Li Wang; Hongbo Zheng; Weimin Xiao; Shanglong Yao; Wei Mei; Xiangdong Chen; Ailin Luo; Liang Sun; Tim Cook; Elizabeth Behringer; Johannes M Huitink; David T Wong; Meghan Lane-Fall; Alistair F McNarry; Barry McGuire; Andrew Higgs; Amit Shah; Anil Patel; Mingzhang Zuo; Wuhua Ma; Zhanggang Xue; Li-Ming Zhang; Wenxian Li; Yong Wang; Carin Hagberg; Ellen P O'Sullivan; Lee A Fleisher; Huafeng Wei
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 11.719

4.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Waleed Alhazzani; Morten Hylander Møller; Yaseen M Arabi; Mark Loeb; Michelle Ng Gong; Eddy Fan; Simon Oczkowski; Mitchell M Levy; Lennie Derde; Amy Dzierba; Bin Du; Michael Aboodi; Hannah Wunsch; Maurizio Cecconi; Younsuck Koh; Daniel S Chertow; Kathryn Maitland; Fayez Alshamsi; Emilie Belley-Cote; Massimiliano Greco; Matthew Laundy; Jill S Morgan; Jozef Kesecioglu; Allison McGeer; Leonard Mermel; Manoj J Mammen; Paul E Alexander; Amy Arrington; John E Centofanti; Giuseppe Citerio; Bandar Baw; Ziad A Memish; Naomi Hammond; Frederick G Hayden; Laura Evans; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Personal protective equipment (PPE) for both anesthesiologists and other airway managers: principles and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shannon L Lockhart; Laura V Duggan; Randy S Wax; Stephan Saad; Hilary P Grocott
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 6.713

6.  Just the Facts: Airway management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Authors:  George Kovacs; Nicholas Sowers; Samuel Campbell; James French; Paul Atkinson
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.410

7.  Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: a prospective international multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  K El-Boghdadly; D J N Wong; R Owen; M D Neuman; S Pocock; J B Carlisle; C Johnstone; P Andruszkiewicz; P A Baker; B M Biccard; G L Bryson; M T V Chan; M H Cheng; K J Chin; M Coburn; M Jonsson Fagerlund; S N Myatra; P S Myles; E O'Sullivan; L Pasin; F Shamim; W A van Klei; I Ahmad
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 12.893

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.