Literature DB >> 33709282

Influence of genetic polymorphisms in glutathione-S-transferases gene in response to imatinib among Brazilian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Kezia Aguiar Delmond1,2, Hugo Delleon1,3, Rebeca Mota Goveia1, Thallita Monteiro Teixeira1, Davi Carvalho Abreu1, Francyelli Mello-Andrade1,4, Angela Adamski da Silva Reis5, Daniela de Melo E Silva6, Adriana do Prado Barbosa7, Renato Sampaio Tavares7, Carlos Eduardo Anunciação5, Elisângela Silveira-Lacerda8.   

Abstract

Polymorphism in metabolizing enzymes can influence drug response as well as the risk for adverse drug reactions. Nevertheless, there are still few studies analyzing the consequence of polymorphisms for the Glutathione-S-transferases (GST) gene to drug response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study reports, the influence of GSTP1*B and GSTT1/GSTM1null polymorphisms in response to imatinib in CML patients in a Brazilian population. One hundred thirty-nine CML patients from the Clinical Hospital of Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, treated with imatinib were enrolled in this study. Genotyping of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes deletions were performed by qPCR and of GSTP1 gene was performed by RFLP-PCR. The frequency of GSTP1*1B, GSTT1 and GSTM1null polymorphisms were determined for all patients. The influence of each patient's genotypes was analyzed with the patient's response to imatinib treatment. Brazilian CML patients revealed GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes deletions. GSTT1 deletion was found in 19.3% of patients and GSTM1 deletion in 48.7% of patients with CML. GSTT1/GSTM1 deletion was found in 11.7% in Brazilian CML patients. The "G allele" of GSTP1*B, is associated with later cytogenetic response in imatinib therapy. While, the gene presence combined with GG genotype (GSTM1 present/GSTPI-GG) conferred a tend to a later cytogenetic response to patients. GSTP1*B and GSTT1/GSTM1null polymorphisms influence treatment response in CML. Brazilian CML patients presenting GSTP1 AA/AG genotypes alone and in combination with GSTT1 null reach the cytogenetic response faster, while patients presenting GSTP1-GG and GSTMI positive genotypes may take longer to achieve cytogenetic response. As a result, it allows a better prognosis, with the use of an alternative therapy, other than reducing treatment cost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic myeloid leukemia; Cytogenetic response; GST; Imatinib; Personalized medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33709282     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-020-06093-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  32 in total

1.  Personalized medicine: does the molecular suit fit?

Authors:  Edison T Liu; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-06

2.  Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

Authors:  B Hanfstein; M C Müller; R Hehlmann; P Erben; M Lauseker; A Fabarius; S Schnittger; C Haferlach; G Göhring; U Proetel; H-J Kolb; S W Krause; W-K Hofmann; J Schubert; H Einsele; J Dengler; M Hänel; C Falge; L Kanz; A Neubauer; M Kneba; F Stegelmann; M Pfreundschuh; C F Waller; S Branford; T P Hughes; K Spiekermann; G M Baerlocher; M Pfirrmann; J Hasford; S Saußele; A Hochhaus
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Management of dose variability and side effects for individualized cancer pharmacotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Tomohiro Terada; Satoshi Noda; Ken-Ichi Inui
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Letter: A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence and Giemsa staining.

Authors:  J D Rowley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A population study showing that the advent of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors has improved progression-free survival in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Sebastian Francis; Claire Lucas; Steven Lane; Lihui Wang; Sarah Watmough; Katy Knight; Jo Bell; Mohammed Kaleel-Rahman; Edwin Lee; David O'Brien; Nauman M Butt; Walid Sadik; Lally De Soysa; Jim R C Seale; Rahuman Salim; Richard E Clark
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Cancer statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2014 update on diagnosis, monitoring, and management.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 8.  Imatinib therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia: strategies to avoid and overcome resistance.

Authors:  A Hochhaus; P La Rosée
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Oncogenic signaling: new insights and controversies from chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Richard A Van Etten
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 10.  Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in The 21st Century.

Authors:  Rachel Frazer; Alexandra E Irvine; Mary Frances McMullin
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2007-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.