| Literature DB >> 33708671 |
Sambardhan Dabadi1, Raju Raj Dhungel1, Pragya Dhungel1, Pritam Gurung2, Resha Shrestha2, Samir Acharya2, Pravesh Rajbhandhari2, Pranaya Shrestha2, Basant Pant2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The main aim of this study is to determine the anterior commissure-posterior commissure (AC-PC) distance in Nepalese cohort and has comparison of intercommissural distance of Nepalese cohort with some other races.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior commissure; Nepalese; deep brain stimulation; lesioning; posterior commissure
Year: 2020 PMID: 33708671 PMCID: PMC7869301 DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_232_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Neurosurg
Selection of Patients
| Gender | Number | Mean age (years) | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 29 | 49.90 | 15.25 |
| Female | 18 | 50.16 | 13.72 |
| Total | 47 | 50.03 | 14.85 |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan Parameters
| Parameters | T1 Sequence | T2 Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| Scanner | Siemens 3T | Siemens 3T |
| Field of View (FoV) | 230 mm | 230 mm |
| Slice Thickness | 1 mm | 1 mm |
| TR | 3300 ms | 2200 ms |
| TE | 404 ms | 3.05 ms |
| No. of Slices | 192 | 192 |
| Orientation | Transversal (Axial) | Transversal (Axial) |
| SNR | 1.00 | 1.03 |
| Voxel size | 0.9*0.9*1 | 0.9*0.9*1 |
| Filter | Raw filter | Pre-scan Normalize |
Figure 1Marking of anterior commissure
Figure 2Marking of posterior commissure
Figure 3Anterior commissure-posterior commissure coordinate system
Figure 4Anterior commissure-posterior commissure conformation in sagittal plane
Figure 5Anterior commissure-posterior commissure distance comparison on male and female
Age based Anterior Commissure-Posterior Commissure distance
| Groups (years) | Number | Mean (years) | SD (years) | AC-PC (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-19 | 2 | 11 | ±1 | 20.45±4.15 |
| 20-29 | 2 | 25 | ±3 | 22.40±1.40 |
| 30-39 | 6 | 34.33 | ±2.86 | 24.08±0.88 |
| 40-49 | 9 | 45.22 | ±2.65 | 25.08±0.75 |
| 50-59 | 15 | 53.53 | ±3.36 | 24.64±1.38 |
| 60-69 | 10 | 64.8 | ±2.63 | 26.23±1.87 |
| 70-79 | 3 | 72 | ±2 | 27.40±0.68 |
Figure 6Anterior commissure-posterior commissure distance comparison with age
Figure 7Comparison of anterior commissure-posterior commissure distance based on ethnic group