| Literature DB >> 33708656 |
Anuj Arun Bhide1, Yashuhiro Yamada1, Yoko Kato1, Nidhisha Sadhwani2, Tsukasa Kawase1, Riki Tanaka1, Kyosuke Miyatani1, Daijiro Kojima1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exact preoperative confirmation of the distal dural ring and intradural location of a paraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm has been an age old dilemma. This study was aimed at identifying anatomical landmarks in cases of paraclinoid aneurysms, which were relatively consistent, and would help in predicting the possibility of an extradural inaccessible location of these aneurysms for surgical clipping.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior clinoid process; distal dural ring; extradural aneurysm; ophthalmic artery; optic strut; paraclinoid aneurysm
Year: 2020 PMID: 33708656 PMCID: PMC7869267 DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_305_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Neurosurg
Figure 1The extradural part of the anterior clinoid process (triangular shaped) before being nibbled off completely
Figure 2The step of cutting of distal dural ring with the anterior clinoid process base on the right side (with bone wax applied over it), fronto-lateral parenchyma seen on the left side and the “V” shaped dural incision in the center
Figure 3Case 1: Antero-posterior and medio-lateral three dimensional CT reconstruction images of a left paraclinoidal internal carotid artery aneurysm directed medially (top left and top right respectively). The bottom left image shows the optic strut (red arrow head superior angle) on a coronal CT image and the image on the bottom right shows the anterior clinoid process (black and white arrow) with the aneurysm sac (black arrow)
Figure 8Case 3: The intraoperative findings similar to above cases showing the clinoidectomy (top left), the distal dural ring opening (black and white arrow, red arrow head) and the inability to visualize the aneurysm on the medial side of the internal carotid artery
Intra-operative location analysis of aneurysm in study population
| Group | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| Intradural | 82 (91.1) |
| Extradural | 8 (8.9) |
Comparison of site of aneurysm with group (n=90)
| Site of aneurysm | Group | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intradural | Extradural | ||
| Lateral (%) | 10 (12.2) | 0 (0) | 10 (11.1) |
| Medial (%) | 35 (42.7) | 7 (87.5) | 42 (46.7) |
| Posterior (%) | 5 (6.1) | 1 (12.5) | 6 (6.7) |
| Superior (%) | 32 (39) | 0 (0) | 32 (35.6) |
| Total | 82 | 8 | 89 |
| 7.68 | |||
| 0.05 | |||
The difference in the proportion of site of aneurysm between intradural and extradural group was statistically significant (P=0.053)
Comparison of optic strut with group (n=89)
| OS | Group | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intradural | Extradural | ||
| Below level of neck (-) (%) | 76 (93.8) | 5 (62.5) | 81 (91) |
| Level of neck (at 0) (%) | 3 (3.7) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.4) |
| Above the neck (+) (%) | 2 (2.5) | 3 (37.5) | 5 (5.6) |
| Total | 81 | 8 | 89 |
| 16.985 | |||
| <0.001 | |||
The difference in the proportion of OS between intradural and extradural group was statistically significant (P<0.001). OS – Optic strut
Comparison of anterior clinoid process with group (n=89)
| ACP | Group | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intradural | Extradural | ||
| Below level of neck (-) (%) | 17 (21) | 0 (0) | 17 (19.1) |
| Level of neck (at 0) (%) | 9 (11.1) | 1 (12.5) | 10 (11.2) |
| Above the neck (+) (%) | 55 (67.9) | 7 (87.5) | 62 (69.7) |
| Total | 81 | 8 | 89 |
| 2.093 | |||
| 0.351 | |||
The difference in the proportion of as between intradural and extradural group was statistically not significant (P=0.351). ACP – Anterior clinoid process
Comparison of ophthalmic artery with group (n=89)
| OA | Group | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intradural | Extradural | ||
| Below level of neck (-) (%) | 59 (72.8) | 1 (12.5) | 60 (67.4) |
| Level of neck (at 0) (%) | 18 (22.2) | 6 (75) | 24 (27) |
| Above the neck (+)(%) | 4 (4.9) | 1 (12.5) | 5 (5.6) |
| Total | 81 | 8 | 89 |
| 12.19 | |||
| 0.002 | |||
The difference in the proportion of OA between intradural and extradural group was statistically significant (P=0.002). OA – Ophthalmic artery