| Literature DB >> 33708653 |
Somil Jaiswal1, Manish Jaiswal1, Pooja Jaiswal2, Ankur Bajaj1, Chhitij Srivastava1, Anil Chandra1, Bal Krishna Ojha1, Janu Vikas1, Awadhesh Yadav1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microsurgical resection has been considered the gold standard treatment of craniopharyngioma, but lately, it has found less favor due to its morbidity and is being replaced by minimally invasive cyst drainage procedures. We present our experience of transventricular endoscopy and cyst drainage along with its technique and have analyzed its results.Entities:
Keywords: Cystic craniopharyngioma; Ommaya; cystocisternostomy; endoscopic transcortical transventricular; radiotherapy
Year: 2020 PMID: 33708653 PMCID: PMC7869278 DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_252_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Neurosurg
Figure 1Endoscopic cystic decompression and cystocisternostomy. (Patient no 13 [Table 2]) Top row images 1 and 2 – Magnetic resonance imaging T2 images show cystic craniopharyngioma with extension to the 3rd ventricle. Top row images 3 and 4 – Endoscopic images of cystic craniopharyngioma occluding the foramen of Monro and endoscopic intracavitary image showing flecks of calcification. Bottom row image 1 – Fluid aspirated from cystic craniopharyngioma -“Machine oil.” Bottom row images 2-4 – Computed tomography images shows site of burr hole, shows decompression of cystic cavity and regression of ventriculomegaly (follow-up computed tomography at 6 months)
Figure 2Top row images1-3 – Magnetic resonance imaging T2 images axial, coronal, and sagittal section shows hyperintense cystic craniopharyngioma extending into the third ventricle with ventriculomegaly. Bottom row image 1 and 2 – Computed tomography axial sections show catheter tip into the cystic cavity and Ommaya reservoir at the burr hole site
Presenting symptoms of the patients (n=32).
| Symptoms | Number of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Headache | 27 (84) |
| Nausea/vomiting | 24 (75) |
| Confusion | 6 (19) |
| Visual disturbance | 25 (78) |
| Hormonal deficiency | 7 (22) |
Clinicoradiological profile and outcome data of the study patients
| Patient number | Age/sex | Symptom | Cyst maximum diameter on MRI (cm) | Endoscopic cyst fenestration with Ommaya placement | Cystocisternostomy | VP shunt | Complications | Radiotherapy | Recurrence | Follow-up (months) | Expiry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 years/male | HA | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 36 | Lost in follow-up | ||
| 2 | 10 years/male | HA | 4 | Yes | Burr hole site skin infection | Yes | 18 | ||||
| 3 | 65 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 15 | ||||
| 4 | 9 years/female | HA | 4 | Yes | Yes | 20 | |||||
| 5 | 9 years/female | C | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 17 | Lost in follow-up | ||
| 6 | 16 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | Seizure | Yes | Yes | 22 | Resurgery | |
| 7 | 10 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | 12 | |||||
| 8 | 5 years/female | HA | 4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3 | Expired | |||
| 9 | 6 years/female | HA | 4 | Yes | Yes | Shunt infection, meningitis, seizure | Yes | 6 | |||
| 10 | 68 years/male | C | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||||
| 11 | 25 years/male | HA | 4 | Yes | Meningitis | Yes | 18 | ||||
| 12 | 18 years/female | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 25 | Lost in follow-up | ||
| 13 | 10 years/male | HA | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||||
| 14 | 35 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | 15 | |||||
| 15 | 12 years/male | HA | 4 | Yes | Seizure | Yes | 48 | ||||
| 16 | 15 years/male | HA | 6 | Yes | Yes | yes | Yes | 20 | Resurgery | ||
| 17 | 10 years/male | HA | 4 | Yes | Yes | 6 | Expired | ||||
| 18 | 7 years/male | HA | 4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 | ||||
| 19 | 8 years/female | C | 5 | Yes | Yes | 32 | |||||
| 20 | 10 years/female | HA | 4 | Yes | Burr hole site EDH | Yes | 76 | ||||
| 21 | 45 years/maleh | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | Shunt malfunction, CSF leak | Yes | 50 | |||
| 22 | 11 years/female | HA | 6 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 24 | ||||
| 23 | 7 years/male | C | 8 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 46 | Lost in follow-up | ||
| 24 | 16 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Seizure | Yes | 32 | ||||
| 25 | 3 years/male | HA | 3 | Yes | Yes | 11 | |||||
| 26 | 8 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 15 | ||||
| 27 | 10 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | Shunt malfunction, CSF leak | Yes | 33 | |||
| 28 | 16 years/male | C | 5 | Yes | IVH | Yes | 10 | ||||
| 29 | 7 years/female | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | 6 | Expired | ||||
| 30 | 8 years/male | HA | 5 | Yes | Yes | 17 | |||||
| 31 | 15 years/male | HA | 4 | Yes | Yes | Subdural collection | Yes | 25 | |||
| 32 | 19 years/male | HA | 4 | Yes | Yes | 36 |
HA – Headache; NV – Nausea/vomiting; VD – Visual deficit; C – Confusion; HD – Hormonal deficiency; IVH – Intraventricular hemorrhage; EDH – Extradural hemorrhage; CSF – Cerebrospinal fluid
Figure 4Top row images 1 and 2 – Computed tomography axial and coronal sections show large cystic suprasellar tumor with calcification. Bottom row image - catheter in situ in cystic cavity with reduction in cyst volume
Figure 3The patient underwent cystocisternostomy. Top row images 1 and 2 – Magnetic resonance imaging T1 contrast coronal and sagittal section shows contrast-enhancing cystic craniopharyngioma reaching up to foramen of Monro with ventriculomegaly. Top row images 3 and 4 – Magnetic resonance imaging T2 coronal and sagittal section shows hyperintense cystic craniopharyngioma Bottom row images 1-3 – Magnetic resonance imaging T1 contrast sagittal, T2 coronal and sagittal sections show reduction and regression of cystic cavity and improvement of ventriculomegaly
Complications encountered in the study patients
| Complications | Number of patients |
|---|---|
| Burr hole site skin infection | 1 |
| Meningitis | 2 |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage | 1 |
| Subdural hygroma or collection | 1 |
| Shunt malfunction | 2 |
| Shunt infection | 1 |
| CSF leak | 2 |
| Burr hole site EDH | 1 |
| Seizures | 4 |
EDH – Extradural hemorrhage; CSF – Cerebrospinal fluid
Summary of series describing endoscopic cyst drainage with Ommaya shunt placement
| Study | Type of study | Number of patients | Radiotherapy | Follow-up (months) | Outcome | Recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hellwig | Retrospective | 5 | No | NA | Improved | No |
| Nokamizo | Retrospective | 1 | No | 24 | Improved | No |
| Joki | Retrospective | 1 | Yes | 6 | Improved | No |
| Delitala | Retrospective | 7 | Yes | 38 | Improved | 28% |
| Nakahara | Retrospective | 3 | Yes | 7 | Improved | 33% |
| Tirakotai | Retrospective | 10 | No | NA | Improved | No |
| Berlis | Retrospective | 1 | No | 6 | Improved | No |
| Cinalli | Retrospective | 1 | No | 12 | Improved | No |
| Fujimoto | Retrospective | 1 | No | 48 | Improved | No |
| Park | Retrospective | 13 | Yes | 32 | Improved | 54% |
| Takano | Retrospective | 9 | Yes | 73 | Improved | 11% |
| Shukla 2015 | Retrospective | 3 | Yes | 6-11 | Improved | No |
| Lauretti | Retrospective | 8 | Yes | 56 | Improved | 12.5% |
| Present series | Retrospective | 32 | Yes | 3-76 | Improved | 18.7% |
N/A – Not available