| Literature DB >> 33708526 |
Bin Li1, Youjia Wu1, Qingjuan He1, Hui Zhou1, Jin Cai1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the effects of complex febrile seizures on hippocampal function and the significance of antiepileptic therapy.Entities:
Keywords: BCL-2; Complex febrile convulsions; antiepileptic drugs; hippocampal function
Year: 2021 PMID: 33708526 PMCID: PMC7944171 DOI: 10.21037/tp-20-458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Pediatr ISSN: 2224-4336
Baseline data
| Project | VPA group (n=54) | LEV group (n=52) | Observation group (n=42) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 28/26 | 27/25 | 22/20 |
| Starting age (months) | 16.59±10.74 | 15.86±11.52 | 16.03±10.87 |
| Onset body temperature (°C) | 38.24±0.67 | 38.59±0.71 | 38.41±0.62 |
| Family history (yes/no) | 30/24 | 31/21 | 22/20 |
| Frequency of seizures (times/hot range) | 2.63±0.85 | 2.79±0.74 | 2.68±0.83 |
| People with abnormal EEG | |||
| Generalized slow wave | 12 | 11 | 10 |
| Focal or multifocal spikes, sharp waves, and spike (tip) slow waves are emitted | 8 | 10 | 4 |
| Epileptic discharge | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Hippocampal lesions | |||
| Changes in hippocampal volume and T2 signal | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Unilateral hippocampal injury | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Bilateral hippocampal injury | 1 | 1 | 2 |
VEP, sodium valproate; LEV, levetiracetam; EEG, electroencephalogram
Figure 1Results of EEG examination. (A) Normal EEG; (B) extensive slow wave; (C) sharp wave emission; (D) extensive spike slow wave. EEG, electroencephalogram.
Disease outcome
| Project | VPA group, n (%) | LEV group, n (%) | Observation group, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| No recurrence | 40 (75.07)# | 35 (67.31) | 20 (47.62) |
| Recurrence | |||
| Markedly effective | 11 (20.37) | 12 (23.07) | 10 (23.81) |
| Effective | 2 (3.70) | 3 (5.77) | 4 (9.52) |
| Invalid | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.92) | 3 (7.14) |
| Aggravate | 1 (1.85)# | 1 (1.92)# | 5 (11.90) |
#, P<0.05 compared with observation group. VPA, sodium valproate; LEV, levetiracetam.
Results of EEG/hippocampal MRI
| Project | VPA group, n (%) | LEV group, n (%) | Observation group, n (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month later | Half-year later | 1 month later | Half-year later | 1 month later | Half-year later | |||
| EEG | ||||||||
| Improve | 18 (85.71)# | 20 (95.24) | 16 (72.72) | 18 (81.82) | 11 (64.71) | 14 (82.35) | ||
| No change | 3 (14.29) | 1 (4.76) | 5 (22.73) | 4 (18.18) | 4 (23.53) | 3 (17.65) | ||
| Aggravate | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (4.55) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (11.76) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| MRI | ||||||||
| Improve | 3 (37.50) | 5 (62.50)# | 2 (25.00) | 4 (50.00) | 1 (12.50) | 1 (12.50) | ||
| No change | 5 (62.50) | 3 (37.50) | 6 (75.00) | 4 (50.00) | 5 (62.50) | 6 (75.00) | ||
| Aggravate | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (25.00) | 1 (12.50) | ||
#, P<0.05 compared with observation group. EEG, electroencephalogram; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Changes of BCL-2 in serum
| Group | BCL-2 (ng/mL) |
|---|---|
| VPA group | |
| Before therapy | 6.67±1.29∆ |
| After 1 month of treatment | 5.42±1.45# |
| After 6 months of treatment | 4.96±1.78# |
| LEV group | |
| Before therapy | 6.48±1.34∆ |
| After 1 month of treatment | 5.61±1.43# |
| After 6 months of treatment | 5.09±1.78 |
| Observation group | |
| Before therapy | 6.75±1.63∆ |
| After 1 month of treatment | 6.42±1.54# |
| After 6 months of treatment | 6.35±1.69# |
| Healthy control group | 4.71±1.23∆ |
#, P<0.05 compared with observation group; ∆, P<0.05 compared with healthy control group. BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; VPA, sodium valproate; LEV, levetiracetam.
IQ test results
| Quotient project | VIQ | PIQ | FIQ | M/C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPA group | ||||
| Before therapy | 113.67±12.97 | 102.85±13.69 | 109.49±14.71 | 30.74±6.03∆ |
| After treatment | 114.52±13.58 | 102.41±13.15 | 110.23±15.26 | 35.82±6.21# |
| LEV group | ||||
| Before therapy | 112.74±12.46 | 102.72±13.89 | 108.71±15.18 | 30.94±5.83∆ |
| After treatment | 112.95±12.87 | 103.38±12.74 | 109.36±15.39 | 34.78±6.27# |
| Observation group | ||||
| Before therapy | 113.14±12.86 | 103.27±13.56 | 109.23±14.95 | 31.12±6.27∆ |
| After treatment | 114.12±13.45 | 103.62±13.71 | 109.84±15.17 | 30.48±6.83 |
| Healthy control group | 114.58±12.72 | 105.53±13.27 | 110.75±14.98 | 37.81±6.49# |
#, P<0.05 compared with observation group; ∆, P<0.05 compared with healthy control group. PIQ, operational intelligence quotient; FIQ total intelligence quotient; M/C memory/attention factor; VIQ/IQ, intelligence quotient; VPA, sodium valproate; LEV, levetiracetam.
Figure 2The morphological manifestations of nerve cells in the hippocampus of a young mouse model of complex febrile seizures (HE stain). (A) Normal group; (B) model group; (C) VPA group; (D) LEV group. Arrows mean the observation positions. VPA, sodium valproate; LEV, levetiracetam.
Figure 3Expression of BCL-2 in the hippocampus of young rats in different groups (immunohistochemical staining). (A) Normal group; (B) model group; (C) VPA group; (D) LEV group. Arrows mean the observation positions. VPA, sodium valproate; LEV, levetiracetam.
Morris water maze test results
| Group | Incubation period | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Model group | 20.89±7.61 | 5.42±1.73 |
| Normal group | 13.05±6.49a | 10.56±2.32a |
| VPA group | 13.78±6.83a | 10.09±2.18a |
| LEV group | 13.31±5.96a | 9.86±2.03a |
a, P<0.05 compared with the model group. VPA, sodium valproate; LEV, levetiracetam.