| Literature DB >> 33708519 |
Feng Xue1, Wei Gao2, Tian Qin1, Cheng Wu3, Yi Luo1, Jing Chen2, Tao Zhou1, Mingxuan Feng1, Bijun Qiu1, Jianjun Zhu1, Jia He3, Qiang Xia1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited studies have been performed in assessment of immune status of pediatric liver transplants (PLTs). We conducted this study to evaluate Cylex immune cell function assay in diagnosis of infection and its potential clinical application in Chinese infant PLTs.Entities:
Keywords: Cylex ATP; ImmuKnow assay; infection; pediatric liver transplantation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33708519 PMCID: PMC7944184 DOI: 10.21037/tp-20-256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Pediatr ISSN: 2224-4336
Figure 1Flow chart of periods of recruitment, follow-up and data collection of the trial.
Characteristics of the enrolled pediatric transplant recipients
| Characteristics | Data of recipients (n=216) | Stable group (n=44) | Infection group (n=160) | Rejection group (n=12) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months), median (IQR) | 7.0 (4.0) | 7.0 (3.8) | 7.0 (3.0) | 9.5 (6.3) | 0.266 |
| Gender, n (%) | 0.767 | ||||
| Male | 111 (51.4) | 24 (54.5) | 80 (50.0) | 7 (58.3) | |
| Female | 105 (38.6) | 20 (45.5) | 80 (50.0) | 5 (41.7) | |
| Weight (kg), median (IQR) | 7.0 (2.0) | 7.0 (2.25) | 7.0 (1.8) | 7.4 (2.0) | 0.802 |
| Height (cm), median (IQR) | 66.0 (6.8) | 64.5 (6.8) | 66.0 (6.0) | 66.5 (4.8) | 0.333 |
| Type of transplant, n (%) | 0.218 | ||||
| DDLT | 5 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (3.1) | 0 | |
| LDLT | 211 (97.7) | 44 (100.0) | 155 (96.9) | 12 (100.0) | |
| Primary disease, n (%) | 0.287 | ||||
| Biliary atresia | 201 (93.1) | 42 (95.5) | 147 (91.9) | 12 (100.0) | |
| CHF | 7 (3.2) | 1 (2.3) | 6 (3.8) | 0 | |
| Alagille syndrome | 3 (1.4) | 0 | 3 (1.9) | 0 | |
| Caroli disease | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 1 (0.6) | 0 | |
| MA | 3 (1.4) | 1 (2.3) | 2 (1.3) | 0 | |
| OTCD | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 1 (0.6) | 0 | |
| Child-Pugh classification, n (%) | 0.300 | ||||
| A | 17 (7.9) | 5 (11.4) | 12 (7.5) | 0 | |
| B | 141 (65.3) | 30 (68.2) | 101 (63.1) | 10 (83.3) | |
| C | 58 (26.9) | 9 (20.5) | 47 (29.4) | 2 (16.7) | |
| PELD score, median (IQR) | 13.0 (11.0) | 13.9 (9.8) | 13.0 (11.0) | 13.5 (8.3) | 0.619 |
| Graft weight (g), median (IQR) | 230.0 (52.3) | 220.5 (35.8) | 230.0 (50.0) | 247.5 (76.8) | 0.237 |
| GRWR (%), median (IQR) | 3.4 (1.0) | 3.4 (1.0) | 3.3 (1.0) | 3.5 (1.0) | 0.986 |
IQR, interquartile range; LDLT living donor liver transplantation; DDLT, deceased donor liver transplantation; CHF, congenital hepatic fibrosis; MA, methylmalonic academia; OTCD, ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency; PELD, pediatric end-stage liver disease; GRWR, graft to recipient weight ratio.
Figure 2Composition of post-transplant immune status (stable, infection, acute cellular rejection and other transplant-related complications) in pediatric liver transplant recipients at each time-point.
Figure 3The distribution of ImmuKnow assay values at each time point from pre-transplant (D0) to post-transplant (1 W/2 W/3 W/4 W/8 W/12 W/24 W). The results show was no significant impact of time on ImmuKnow values (P>0.05). W, week.
Figure 4Analysis of ImmuKnow values in all groups. (A) ImmuKnow values in the infection group were significantly lower than those in stable group (P<0.0001). (B) The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of ImmuKnow values in predicting infection. The area under the curve (AUC) of the assay was 0.784 (95% CI: 0.720–0.848). Youden Index had a maximum value when the ImmuKnow value was 152 ng/mL, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.573 and 0.955, respectively.
Comparison of dose and concentration of tacrolimus between the stable and infection group
| Posttransplant time | Does of tacrolimus (mg/kg/d) | Tacrolimus concentration (ng/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stable group (n=44) | Infection group (n=160) | P value | Stable group (n=44) | Infection group (n=160) | P value | ||
| 1 W | 0.15±0.07 | 0.14±0.06 | 0.890 | 8.28±2.91 | 9.53±3.57 | 0.462 | |
| 2 W | 0.21±0.09 | 0.19±0.08 | 8.19±3.68 | 7.33±2.79 | |||
| 3 W | 0.21±0.09 | 0.19±0.08 | 7.27±2.67 | 7.27±2.73 | |||
| 4 W | 0.22±0.08 | 0.20±0.08 | 7.42±2.18 | 7.22±3.67 | |||
| 8 W | 0.20±0.08 | 0.21±0.10 | 8.01±3.21 | 7.29±3.32 | |||
| 12 W | 0.20±0.08 | 0.20±0.11 | 6.96±1.90 | 7.77±3.65 | |||
| 24 W | 0.10±0.06 | 0.14±0.09 | 6.55±1.77 | 8.30±3.33 | |||
W, week.
Figure 5Correlation of ImmuKnow ATP levels with other clinical parameters, including: (A) TAC concentration; (B) TAC dosage; (C) white blood cell (WBC) counts; (D) lymphocyte numbers; and (E) Kaup index. Data show no correlations between ImmuKnow values and other clinical parameters. TAC, tacrolimus; C/D ratio, TAC trough concentration/dose-normalized concentration.