Lucy Albertella1, Kristian Rotaru1,2, Erynn Christensen1, Amelia Lowe1, Mary-Ellen Brierley1, Karyn Richardson1, Samuel R Chamberlain3, Rico S C Lee1, Edouard Kayayan1, Jon E Grant4, Sam Schluter-Hughes1, Campbell Ince1, Leonardo F Fontenelle1,5,6, Rebecca Segrave1, Murat Yücel1. 1. BrainPark, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia. 2. Monash Business School, Monash University, Caulfield, VIC, Australia. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States. 5. Obsessive, Compulsive, and Anxiety Spectrum Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 6. D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in high levels of psychological distress worldwide, with experts expressing concern that this could result in corresponding increases in addictive behaviors as individuals seek to cope with their distress. Further, some individuals may be at greater risk than others for developing problematic addictive behaviors during times of high stress, such as individuals with high trait impulsivity and compulsivity. Despite the potential of such knowledge to inform early detection of risk, no study to date has examined the influence of trait impulsivity and compulsivity on addictive behaviors during COVID-19. Toward this aim, the current study examined the association between impulsive and compulsive traits and problematic addictive and compulsive behaviors during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Australia. Methods: Eight hundred seventy-eight adults completed a cross-sectional online survey during the first lockdown, between late May to June 2020. Participants completed scales for addictive and compulsive behaviors for the period prior to and during lockdown for problematic eating, pornography, internet use, gambling, drinking, and obsessive-compulsive behaviors. Negative binomial regressions examined the associations between impulsivity, compulsivity, and their interaction with problematic behaviors during lockdown, controlling for age, gender, sample, psychological distress, exposure to COVID-related stressors, and pre-COVID problems. Results: Greater trait compulsivity was associated with more problematic obsessive-compulsive behaviors (p < 0.001) and less problematic drinking (p = 0.038) during lockdown. Further, trait compulsivity interacted with trait impulsivity in relation to problematic eating behaviors (p = 0.014) such that greater trait compulsivity was associated with more problems among individuals with low impulsivity only (p = 0.030). Finally, psychological distress and/or exposure to COVID-related stressors were associated with greater problems across all addictive and compulsive behaviors, as was severity of pre-COVID problems. Discussion: Trait compulsivity was associated with addictive and compulsive behaviors in different ways. Further, the finding that stress-related variables (psychological distress and COVID-related stressors) were associated with greater problems across all lockdown behaviors supports the idea that stress may facilitate, or otherwise be associated with, problematic behaviors. These findings highlight the need for interventions that enhance resilience to stress, which in turn may reduce risk for addictive and compulsive disorders.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in high levels of psychological distress worldwide, with experts expressing concern that this could result in corresponding increases in addictive behaviors as individuals seek to cope with their distress. Further, some individuals may be at greater risk than others for developing problematic addictive behaviors during times of high stress, such as individuals with high trait impulsivity and compulsivity. Despite the potential of such knowledge to inform early detection of risk, no study to date has examined the influence of trait impulsivity and compulsivity on addictive behaviors during COVID-19. Toward this aim, the current study examined the association between impulsive and compulsive traits and problematic addictive and compulsive behaviors during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Australia. Methods: Eight hundred seventy-eight adults completed a cross-sectional online survey during the first lockdown, between late May to June 2020. Participants completed scales for addictive and compulsive behaviors for the period prior to and during lockdown for problematic eating, pornography, internet use, gambling, drinking, and obsessive-compulsive behaviors. Negative binomial regressions examined the associations between impulsivity, compulsivity, and their interaction with problematic behaviors during lockdown, controlling for age, gender, sample, psychological distress, exposure to COVID-related stressors, and pre-COVID problems. Results: Greater trait compulsivity was associated with more problematic obsessive-compulsive behaviors (p < 0.001) and less problematic drinking (p = 0.038) during lockdown. Further, trait compulsivity interacted with trait impulsivity in relation to problematic eating behaviors (p = 0.014) such that greater trait compulsivity was associated with more problems among individuals with low impulsivity only (p = 0.030). Finally, psychological distress and/or exposure to COVID-related stressors were associated with greater problems across all addictive and compulsive behaviors, as was severity of pre-COVID problems. Discussion: Trait compulsivity was associated with addictive and compulsive behaviors in different ways. Further, the finding that stress-related variables (psychological distress and COVID-related stressors) were associated with greater problems across all lockdown behaviors supports the idea that stress may facilitate, or otherwise be associated with, problematic behaviors. These findings highlight the need for interventions that enhance resilience to stress, which in turn may reduce risk for addictive and compulsive disorders.
Authors: K R Magnusson; L Hauck; B M Jeffrey; V Elias; A Humphrey; R Nath; A Perrone; L E Bermudez Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Christina Lynn Boisseau; Heather Thompson-Brenner; Catherine Caldwell-Harris; Elizabeth Pratt; Todd Farchione; David Harrison Barlow Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-06-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Scott G Engel; Stephanie J Corneliussen; Stephen A Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby; Daniel le Grange; Scott Crow; Marjorie Klein; Anna Bardone-Cone; Carol Peterson; Thomas Joiner; James E Mitchell; Howard Steiger Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Orsolya Király; Marc N Potenza; Dan J Stein; Daniel L King; David C Hodgins; John B Saunders; Mark D Griffiths; Biljana Gjoneska; Joël Billieux; Matthias Brand; Max W Abbott; Samuel R Chamberlain; Ornella Corazza; Julius Burkauskas; Célia M D Sales; Christian Montag; Christine Lochner; Edna Grünblatt; Elisa Wegmann; Giovanni Martinotti; Hae Kook Lee; Hans-Jürgen Rumpf; Jesús Castro-Calvo; Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar; Susumu Higuchi; Jose M Menchon; Joseph Zohar; Luca Pellegrini; Susanne Walitza; Naomi A Fineberg; Zsolt Demetrovics Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Claire M Gillan; Trevor W Robbins; Barbara J Sahakian; Odile A van den Heuvel; Guido van Wingen Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Nana Ernst Toldam; Christian Graugaard; Rikke Meyer; Louise Thomsen; Sabine Dreier; Emmanuele A Jannini; Annamaria Giraldi Journal: Sex Med Rev Date: 2022-06-30
Authors: Brendan Dowd; Kaiden Hein; Stephanie L Diez; Maria Prokofieva; Lee Kannis-Dymand; Vasileios Stavropoulos Journal: Int J Ment Health Addict Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 11.555
Authors: Christine Lochner; Lucy Albertella; Martin Kidd; Zelal Kilic; Konstantinos Ioannidis; Jon E Grant; Murat Yücel; Dan J Stein; Samuel R Chamberlain Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Jon E Grant; Lynne Drummond; Timothy R Nicholson; Harry Fagan; David S Baldwin; Naomi A Fineberg; Samuel R Chamberlain Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 8.989