Literature DB >> 33707846

Plateletpheresis in the Era of Automation: Optimizing Donor Safety and Product Quality Using Modern Apheresis Instruments.

Sudipta Sekhar Das1, Subrata Sen1, R U Zaman1, Rathindra Nath Biswas1.   

Abstract

The increases in major surgeries, transplantations and speciality clinics have significantly increased the utilization of platelet concentrates including single donor platelets (SDP). The advantages of SDP or apheresis platelet have been discussed elaborately by previous authors as compared to random donor platelets. Here we share our experiences of plateletpheresis procedures using the modern apheresis machines with regards to product quality and donor safety. This study included 3016 procedures of plateletpheresis (1397 on Amicus and 1619 on Trima accel cell separators) on eligible donors using recommended apheresis kits. A target yield of 3 × 1011 was set as the end point of each procedure. Donor details, procedure details and donor adverse reactions if any were documented. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS statistical package (version 13, USA). Of the total 6276 donors screened 2049 (32.6%) were deferred due to various reasons. Out of remaining 4227 eligible donors; 3016 (71.4%) underwent plateletphereis procedures based on the requirement of SDP by the patients. Mean pre-procedure platelet count and hematocrit in donors were 188.3 × 106/mL and 41.7% respectively. Mean procedure time in Amicus (76.6 min) was significantly more than the Trima accel (64.3 min) (p = 0.02). Platelet yield by Trima accel and Amicus was 2.96 × 1011 and 3.08 × 1011 respectively (p = 0.061). A total of 40 donors (1.33%) suffered adverse effect during or after apheresis procedures. While the modern plateletpheresis devices are both donor and user friendly at the same time they provide quality product consistently in lesser time. © Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell separator; Donor safety; Platelet yield; Plateletpheresis; Single donor platelet

Year:  2020        PMID: 33707846      PMCID: PMC7900306          DOI: 10.1007/s12288-020-01337-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus        ISSN: 0971-4502            Impact factor:   0.900


  34 in total

1.  Quality systems in automated plateletpheresis in hospital-based blood transfusion service in north India.

Authors:  Rajendra Chaudhary; Sudipta Sekhar Das; Prashant Agarwal; Jai Shanker Shukla
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Evaluation of concurrent collection of in-line filtered platelets and packed red blood cells by multicomponent apheresis with three last-generation apparatuses.

Authors:  S M Picker; S M Radojska; B S Gathof
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  Adverse Events During Apheresis Procedures: Audit at a Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Kanchan Dogra; Parag Fulzele; Diptiranjan Rout; Rahul Chaurasia; Poonam Coshic; Kabita Chatterjee
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Comparison of a new microscopic system for the measurement of residual leucocytes in apheresis platelets with flow cytometry and manual counting.

Authors:  J Strobel; U Antos; R Zimmermann; R Eckstein; J Zingsem
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 5.  Use of single donor platelets.

Authors:  S A Kirkley; N Blumberg
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  Importance of ionized magnesium measurement for monitoring of citrate-anticoagulated plateletpheresis.

Authors:  D Mercan; G Bastin; M Lambermont; E Dupont
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Era of blood component therapy: time for mandatory pre-donation platelet count for maximizing donor safety and optimizing quality of platelets.

Authors:  Sudipta Sekhar Das; R U Zaman; Dipak Biswas
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 1.764

8.  A comparison of PLT collections from two apheresis devices.

Authors:  José Luis Bueno; Luisa Barea; Fernando García; Emma Castro
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Febrile reactions after platelet transfusion: the effect of single versus multiple donors.

Authors:  L A Chambers; M S Kruskall; D G Pacini; L M Donovan
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Comprehensive analysis of changes in clinically significant divalent serum cation levels during automated plateletpheresis in healthy donors in a tertiary care center in North India.

Authors:  Archana Solanki; Prashant Agarwal
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.