Literature DB >> 33707543

Precision medicine and machine learning towards the prediction of the outcome of potential celiac disease.

Francesco Piccialli1, Francesco Calabrò2, Danilo Crisci1, Salvatore Cuomo1, Edoardo Prezioso1, Roberta Mandile3, Riccardo Troncone3,4, Luigi Greco3,4, Renata Auricchio3,4.   

Abstract

Potential Celiac Patients (PCD) bear the Celiac Disease (CD) genetic predisposition, a significant production of antihuman transglutaminase antibodies, but no morphological changes in the small bowel mucosa. A minority of patients (17%) showed clinical symptoms and need a gluten free diet at time of diagnosis, while the majority progress over several years (up to a decade) without any clinical problem neither a progression of the small intestine mucosal damage even when they continued to assume gluten in their diet. Recently we developed a traditional multivariate approach to predict the natural history, on the base of the information at enrolment (time 0) by a discriminant analysis model. Still, the traditional multivariate model requires stringent assumptions that may not be answered in the clinical setting. Starting from a follow-up dataset available for PCD, we propose the application of Machine Learning (ML) methodologies to extend the analysis on available clinical data and to detect most influent features predicting the outcome. These features, collected at time of diagnosis, should be capable to classify patients who will develop duodenal atrophy from those who will remain potential. Four ML methods were adopted to select features predictive of the outcome; the feature selection procedure was indeed capable to reduce the number of overall features from 85 to 19. ML methodologies (Random Forests, Extremely Randomized Trees, and Boosted Trees, Logistic Regression) were adopted, obtaining high values of accuracy: all report an accuracy above 75%. The specificity score was always more than 75% also, with two of the considered methods over 98%, while the best performance of sensitivity was 60%. The best model, optimized Boosted Trees, was able to classify PCD starting from the selected 19 features with an accuracy of 0.80, sensitivity of 0.58 and specificity of 0.84. Finally, with this work, we are able to categorize PCD patients that can more likely develop overt CD using ML. ML techniques appear to be an innovative approach to predict the outcome of PCD, since they provide a step forward in the direction of precision medicine aimed to customize healthcare, medical therapies, decisions, and practices tailoring the clinical management of PCD children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33707543      PMCID: PMC7952550          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84951-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  30 in total

1.  Making Machine Learning Models Clinically Useful.

Authors:  Nigam H Shah; Arnold Milstein; Steven C Bagley PhD
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Three pitfalls to avoid in machine learning.

Authors:  Patrick Riley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Alvin Rajkomar; Jeffrey Dean; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evaluating Machine Learning Articles.

Authors:  Finale Doshi-Velez; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Machine learning in rheumatology approaches the clinic.

Authors:  Aridaman Pandit; Timothy R D J Radstake
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Predicting the Future - Big Data, Machine Learning, and Clinical Medicine.

Authors:  Ziad Obermeyer; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.

Authors:  Sudhir Varma; Richard Simon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A Comprehensive Infrastructure for Big Data in Cancer Research: Accelerating Cancer Research and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Izumi V Hinkson; Tanja M Davidsen; Juli D Klemm; Anthony R Kerlavage; Warren A Kibbe; Ishwar Chandramouliswaran
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-09-21

9.  Current Evidence on Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adriana Molder; Daniel Vasile Balaban; Mariana Jinga; Cristian-Constantin Molder
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Machine learning with sparse nutrition data to improve cardiovascular mortality risk prediction in the USA using nationally randomly sampled data.

Authors:  Joseph Rigdon; Sanjay Basu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  4 in total

1.  Recognizing the Emergent and Submerged Iceberg of the Celiac Disease: ITAMA Project-Global Strategy Protocol.

Authors:  Giuseppe Magazzù; Samuel Aquilina; Christopher Barbara; Ramon Bondin; Ignazio Brusca; Jacqueline Bugeja; Mark Camilleri; Donato Cascio; Stefano Costa; Chiara Cuzzupè; Annalise Duca; Maria Fregapane; Vito Gentile; Angele Giuliano; Alessia Grifò; Anne-Marie Grima; Antonio Ieni; Giada Li Calzi; Fabiana Maisano; Giuseppinella Melita; Socrate Pallio; Ilenia Panasiti; Salvatore Pellegrino; Claudio Romano; Salvatore Sorce; Marco Elio Tabacchi; Vincenzo Taormina; Domenico Tegolo; Andrea Tortora; Cesare Valenti; Cecil Vella; Giuseppe Raso
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Application of Extremely Randomised Trees for exploring influential factors on variant crash severity data.

Authors:  Farshid Afshar; Seyedehsan Seyedabrishami; Sara Moridpour
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Celiac disease: From genetics to epigenetics.

Authors:  Elisa Gnodi; Raffaella Meneveri; Donatella Barisani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Automated detection of celiac disease using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Cristian-Andrei Stoleru; Eva H Dulf; Lidia Ciobanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.