Literature DB >> 33706813

Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL): study protocol of a multi-site implementation trial with observational, case study design : Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus.

Jasvinder A Singh1,2,3,4, Larry R Hearld5, Allyson G Hall5, T Mark Beasley6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide the details of the study protocol for an observational, case study design, implementation trial.
METHODS: Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL) study will put into practice a shared decision-making (SDM) strategy, using an individualized, culturally appropriate computerized decision-aid (DA) for lupus patients in 15 geographically diverse clinics in the USA. The overarching frameworks that guide this implementation study are the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Powell's typology of implementation strategies. All 15 clinics will receive standardized capacity-building activities for lupus DA implementation in the clinic, including education, training, technical assistance, re-training, and incorporation of a clinic champion in the core team of each site. In addition, clinics will also choose among clinic-targeted activities to integrate the DA into existing work processes and/or patient-targeted activities to raise awareness and educate patients about the DA. These activities will be chosen to stimulate participant recruitment and retention activities that support the implementation of the DA at their clinic. In study aim 1, using surveys and semi-structured interviews with clinic personnel in 15 lupus clinics, we will assess stakeholder needs and identify clinic and contextual characteristics that inform the implementation strategy component selection and influence implementation effectiveness. Study aim 2 is to implement and assess the effectiveness of the IDEAL (standardized and tailored) strategy in 15 lupus clinics by examining the changes in our primary outcome of penetration, i.e., the proportion of all eligible patients in the clinic that receive the lupus DA, and secondary outcomes include DA appropriateness, acceptability, success, permanence, and feasibility. Study aim 3 is to identify ways to sustain and disseminate our lupus DA via semi-structured debriefing interviews with key clinic personnel and patients. DISCUSSION: The study will enroll at least 500 patient participants with lupus across all 15 sites and assess the effectiveness in implementing the DA in various clinic settings across the USA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03735238 . Protocol version number: 15, date 6/8/2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-aid; Implementation; Lupus; Systematic lupus erythematosus; Trial

Year:  2021        PMID: 33706813      PMCID: PMC7951119          DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00118-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci Commun        ISSN: 2662-2211


  49 in total

1.  Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters.

Authors:  R L Street; B Millay
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2001

2.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Validation of a preparation for decision making scale.

Authors:  Carol Bennett; Ian D Graham; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Stephen A Kearing; Kate F Clay; Annette M O'Connor
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-06-26

4.  Mapping Perceptions of Lupus Medication Decision-Making Facilitators: The Importance of Patient Context.

Authors:  Haiyan Qu; Richard M Shewchuk; Graciela Alarcón; Liana Fraenkel; Amye Leong; Maria Dall'Era; Jinoos Yazdany; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Distribution of primary renal diseases leading to end-stage renal failure in the United States, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand: results from an international comparative study.

Authors:  P Maisonneuve; L Agodoa; R Gellert; J H Stewart; G Buccianti; A B Lowenfels; R A Wolfe; E Jones; A P Disney; D Briggs; M McCredie; P Boyle
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 6.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

7.  Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups.

Authors:  Anita L Stewart; Anna M Nápoles-Springer; Steven E Gregorich; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Prognosis in proliferative lupus nephritis: the role of socio-economic status and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  R Graham Barr; Stephen Seliger; Gerald B Appel; Ricardo Zuniga; Vivette D'Agati; Jane Salmon; Jai Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients.

Authors:  Ricard Cervera; Munther A Khamashta; Josep Font; Gian Domenico Sebastiani; Antonio Gil; Paz Lavilla; Juan Carlos Mejía; A Olcay Aydintug; Hanna Chwalinska-Sadowska; Enrique de Ramón; Antonio Fernández-Nebro; Mauro Galeazzi; Merete Valen; Alessandro Mathieu; Frédéric Houssiau; Natividad Caro; Paula Alba; Manuel Ramos-Casals; Miguel Ingelmo; Graham R V Hughes
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Using tablet computers compared to interactive voice response to improve subject recruitment in osteoporosis pragmatic clinical trials: feasibility, satisfaction, and sample size.

Authors:  Amy S Mudano; Lisa C Gary; Ana L Oliveira; Mary Melton; Nicole C Wright; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth Delzell; T Michael Harrington; Meredith L Kilgore; Cora Elizabeth Lewis; Jasvinder A Singh; Amy H Warriner; Wilson D Pace; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.