Jasvinder A Singh1,2,3,4, Larry R Hearld5, Allyson G Hall5, T Mark Beasley6. 1. Medicine Service, VA Medical Center, 700 19th St S, AL, Birmingham, 35233, USA. Jasvinder.md@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 Second Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA. Jasvinder.md@gmail.com. 3. Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 Second Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA. Jasvinder.md@gmail.com. 4. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 805B, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA. Jasvinder.md@gmail.com. 5. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 805B, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA. 6. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham/Atlanta VA Geriatric Research, Education, & Clinical Center, Department of Veteran's Affairs, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide the details of the study protocol for an observational, case study design, implementation trial. METHODS: Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL) study will put into practice a shared decision-making (SDM) strategy, using an individualized, culturally appropriate computerized decision-aid (DA) for lupus patients in 15 geographically diverse clinics in the USA. The overarching frameworks that guide this implementation study are the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Powell's typology of implementation strategies. All 15 clinics will receive standardized capacity-building activities for lupus DA implementation in the clinic, including education, training, technical assistance, re-training, and incorporation of a clinic champion in the core team of each site. In addition, clinics will also choose among clinic-targeted activities to integrate the DA into existing work processes and/or patient-targeted activities to raise awareness and educate patients about the DA. These activities will be chosen to stimulate participant recruitment and retention activities that support the implementation of the DA at their clinic. In study aim 1, using surveys and semi-structured interviews with clinic personnel in 15 lupus clinics, we will assess stakeholder needs and identify clinic and contextual characteristics that inform the implementation strategy component selection and influence implementation effectiveness. Study aim 2 is to implement and assess the effectiveness of the IDEAL (standardized and tailored) strategy in 15 lupus clinics by examining the changes in our primary outcome of penetration, i.e., the proportion of all eligible patients in the clinic that receive the lupus DA, and secondary outcomes include DA appropriateness, acceptability, success, permanence, and feasibility. Study aim 3 is to identify ways to sustain and disseminate our lupus DA via semi-structured debriefing interviews with key clinic personnel and patients. DISCUSSION: The study will enroll at least 500 patient participants with lupus across all 15 sites and assess the effectiveness in implementing the DA in various clinic settings across the USA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03735238 . Protocol version number: 15, date 6/8/2020.
OBJECTIVE: To provide the details of the study protocol for an observational, case study design, implementation trial. METHODS: Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL) study will put into practice a shared decision-making (SDM) strategy, using an individualized, culturally appropriate computerized decision-aid (DA) for lupus patients in 15 geographically diverse clinics in the USA. The overarching frameworks that guide this implementation study are the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Powell's typology of implementation strategies. All 15 clinics will receive standardized capacity-building activities for lupus DA implementation in the clinic, including education, training, technical assistance, re-training, and incorporation of a clinic champion in the core team of each site. In addition, clinics will also choose among clinic-targeted activities to integrate the DA into existing work processes and/or patient-targeted activities to raise awareness and educate patients about the DA. These activities will be chosen to stimulate participant recruitment and retention activities that support the implementation of the DA at their clinic. In study aim 1, using surveys and semi-structured interviews with clinic personnel in 15 lupus clinics, we will assess stakeholder needs and identify clinic and contextual characteristics that inform the implementation strategy component selection and influence implementation effectiveness. Study aim 2 is to implement and assess the effectiveness of the IDEAL (standardized and tailored) strategy in 15 lupus clinics by examining the changes in our primary outcome of penetration, i.e., the proportion of all eligible patients in the clinic that receive the lupus DA, and secondary outcomes include DA appropriateness, acceptability, success, permanence, and feasibility. Study aim 3 is to identify ways to sustain and disseminate our lupus DA via semi-structured debriefing interviews with key clinic personnel and patients. DISCUSSION: The study will enroll at least 500 patientparticipants with lupus across all 15 sites and assess the effectiveness in implementing the DA in various clinic settings across the USA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03735238 . Protocol version number: 15, date 6/8/2020.
Authors: Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Carol Bennett; Ian D Graham; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Stephen A Kearing; Kate F Clay; Annette M O'Connor Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-06-26
Authors: Haiyan Qu; Richard M Shewchuk; Graciela Alarcón; Liana Fraenkel; Amye Leong; Maria Dall'Era; Jinoos Yazdany; Jasvinder A Singh Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: P Maisonneuve; L Agodoa; R Gellert; J H Stewart; G Buccianti; A B Lowenfels; R A Wolfe; E Jones; A P Disney; D Briggs; M McCredie; P Boyle Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-10-05
Authors: Anita L Stewart; Anna M Nápoles-Springer; Steven E Gregorich; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: R Graham Barr; Stephen Seliger; Gerald B Appel; Ricardo Zuniga; Vivette D'Agati; Jane Salmon; Jai Radhakrishnan Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Ricard Cervera; Munther A Khamashta; Josep Font; Gian Domenico Sebastiani; Antonio Gil; Paz Lavilla; Juan Carlos Mejía; A Olcay Aydintug; Hanna Chwalinska-Sadowska; Enrique de Ramón; Antonio Fernández-Nebro; Mauro Galeazzi; Merete Valen; Alessandro Mathieu; Frédéric Houssiau; Natividad Caro; Paula Alba; Manuel Ramos-Casals; Miguel Ingelmo; Graham R V Hughes Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Amy S Mudano; Lisa C Gary; Ana L Oliveira; Mary Melton; Nicole C Wright; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth Delzell; T Michael Harrington; Meredith L Kilgore; Cora Elizabeth Lewis; Jasvinder A Singh; Amy H Warriner; Wilson D Pace; Kenneth G Saag Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 2.711