Qiao Liu1,2, Nannan You1,3, Hongqiu Pan4, Ye Shen5, Peng Lu1, Jianming Wang2, Wei Lu1, Limei Zhu1, Leonardo Martinez6. 1. Department of Chronic Communicable Disease, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China. 3. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Tuberculosis, The Third People's Hospital of Zhenjiang Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia; and. 6. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Rationale: Patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis often have inconsistent glycemic measurements during and after treatment. Distinct glycemic trajectories after the diagnosis of tuberculosis are not well characterized, and whether patients with stress hyperglycemia have poor treatment outcomes is not known. Objectives: To identify distinct glycemic trajectories from the point of tuberculosis diagnosis to the posttreatment period and to assess the relationship between glycemic trajectories and tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, drug-susceptible tuberculosis and with at least three fasting plasma glucose tests at tuberculosis diagnosis and during the third and sixth month of treatment were identified and included from Jiangsu Province, China. Patients were also given an additional fasting plasma glucose test at 2 and 4 months after treatment.Measurements and Main Results: Several distinct glycemic trajectories from the point of tuberculosis diagnosis to the posttreatment period were found, including consistently normal glycemic testing results (43%), transient hyperglycemia (24%), erratic glycemic instability (12%), diabetes (16%), and consistent hyperglycemia without diabetes (6%). Compared with participants with a consistently normal glycemic trajectory, patients with transient hyperglycemia were more likely to experience treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-11.25; P = 0.004) or erratic glycemic instability (AOR, 5.98; 95% CI, 2.00-17.87; P = 0.001). Patients living with diabetes also had a higher risk of experiencing treatment failure (AOR, 6.56; 95% CI, 2.22-19.35; P = 0.001), and this was modified by glycemic control and metformin use.Conclusions: Among patients with tuberculosis without diabetes, glycemic changes were common and may represent an important marker for patient response to tuberculosis treatment.
Rationale: Patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis often have inconsistent glycemic measurements during and after treatment. Distinct glycemic trajectories after the diagnosis of tuberculosis are not well characterized, and whether patients with stress hyperglycemia have poor treatment outcomes is not known. Objectives: To identify distinct glycemic trajectories from the point of tuberculosis diagnosis to the posttreatment period and to assess the relationship between glycemic trajectories and tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Methods:Patients with newly diagnosed, drug-susceptible tuberculosis and with at least three fasting plasma glucose tests at tuberculosis diagnosis and during the third and sixth month of treatment were identified and included from Jiangsu Province, China. Patients were also given an additional fasting plasma glucose test at 2 and 4 months after treatment.Measurements and Main Results: Several distinct glycemic trajectories from the point of tuberculosis diagnosis to the posttreatment period were found, including consistently normal glycemic testing results (43%), transient hyperglycemia (24%), erratic glycemic instability (12%), diabetes (16%), and consistent hyperglycemia without diabetes (6%). Compared with participants with a consistently normal glycemic trajectory, patients with transient hyperglycemia were more likely to experience treatment failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-11.25; P = 0.004) or erratic glycemic instability (AOR, 5.98; 95% CI, 2.00-17.87; P = 0.001). Patients living with diabetes also had a higher risk of experiencing treatment failure (AOR, 6.56; 95% CI, 2.22-19.35; P = 0.001), and this was modified by glycemic control and metformin use.Conclusions: Among patients with tuberculosis without diabetes, glycemic changes were common and may represent an important marker for patient response to tuberculosis treatment.